Hi, this bug is really embarassing, whenever i do stamp, the stamp would get covered by other sprites behind it, even though i put the stamping sprite at the front. Please fix this because its a big part of my 3D project.
Offline
That's not a bug, that's just how it works.
And how's it embarrassing?
Last edited by henley (2012-08-27 18:45:32)
Offline
It's not a bug, but it would be really useful if you could stamp it at the front. I've had to create lots of workarounds because of it.
Offline
I find this annoying as well. But naturally, stamps can only stamp on the background. Otherwise, sprites would have bits of other sprites stamped on them!
Scratch 2.0 with the cloning feature will work well though I think
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
the scratch team made this bug on purpose
You can't make a bug, although, while they may have intended for it to be possible to stamp over other sprites, they probably thought it wouldn't be TOO big of a problem for them to fix.
After all, even with tons of scripts, it's easy to duplicate a sprite.
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
the scratch team made this bug on purpose
Why would they?
Offline
ArloarLoLs wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
the scratch team made this bug on purpose
Why would they?
jji7skyline wrote:
I find this annoying as well. But naturally, stamps can only stamp on the background. Otherwise, sprites would have bits of other sprites stamped on them!
![]()
Offline
ArloarLoLs wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
the scratch team made this bug on purpose
Why would they?
Why did they create the costumes rename glitch ? the answer to it is just: "I don't know"
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
ArloarLoLs wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
the scratch team made this bug on purpose
Why would they?
Why did they create the costumes rename glitch ? the answer to it is just: "I don't know"
They don't make glitches glitches are either faulty or a lack of programming.
Offline
henley wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
ArloarLoLs wrote:
Why would they?
Why did they create the costumes rename glitch ? the answer to it is just: "I don't know"
They don't make glitches glitches are either faulty or a lack of programming.
they said that this glitch was intentional (I didn't believe this at first,but it's true !)
Offline