Scratch

Please review my game 2-player tank wars

Can you review my Mouse Maze game? http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/CN12/2749967

medog wrote:

MOUSE MAZE



Graphics: 45/50; I love all the cool effects you made!

Script quality: 30/50; The mouse controls well but there are some glitches that leave you unable to complete the game.

Game concept: 40/50; There are some like it, but put together really well to make a good concept.

Gameplay: 25/50; The game's main weaknesses are the glitches that make the game tough to play. Such as a glitch I found several times; I skip from level 1 to 3, but I am unable to play level 3. And since there are only 3 levels, the game ends up too short.

Final Rating: 140/200; It's a very good game overall, but it suffers from the major bugs.

Okay, thanks! I'll make it better soon!

medog wrote:

Borrego6165 wrote:

Thanks!

GENERATION-4000

Graphics:50/50; A beautifully decorated game with some assisting effects, too!

Script Quality:50/50; While playing, I found absolutely no bugs whatsoever.

Game Concept:50/50; Never seen anything quite like this, yet this concept does it's job.

Gameplay:40/50; Incredibly fun to play, yet after a long while, it can get a little old.

Final Rating: 190/200; Nearly Perfect! Wonderfully made and constructed, this game receives a love-it!

woo! And I know it gets boring which is why I added some features. i'm guessing you never got the cheat codes which allowed you to change the advisor from the plain old man he was to a vampire-like creature who gives you evil advise? or perhaps the tourism buildings which look great and provide you with a lot of money, and these add a new element of game-play.

So although it might seem to get old, I did add gaming elements which are meant to be delayed so that it get new features rather than having it all at once and getting bored after a little while. Plus, it's an endless game so the idea is you never get bored, because you're supposed to stop when you do get fed up of it as it's your choice.

If you got bored within 5 minutes, fair enough. But if you played it for a while (and got to build most of the different buildings, experimented with some different styles of cities and changed the advisor) you may have thought it was less old.

So, it doesn't deserve a full 10 points off? Perhaps less.

Borrego6165 wrote:

medog wrote:

Borrego6165 wrote:

Thanks!

GENERATION-4000

Graphics:50/50; A beautifully decorated game with some assisting effects, too!

Script Quality:50/50; While playing, I found absolutely no bugs whatsoever.

Game Concept:50/50; Never seen anything quite like this, yet this concept does it's job.

Gameplay:40/50; Incredibly fun to play, yet after a long while, it can get a little old.

Final Rating: 190/200; Nearly Perfect! Wonderfully made and constructed, this game receives a love-it!

woo! And I know it gets boring which is why I added some features. i'm guessing you never got the cheat codes which allowed you to change the advisor from the plain old man he was to a vampire-like creature who gives you evil advise? or perhaps the tourism buildings which look great and provide you with a lot of money, and these add a new element of game-play.

So although it might seem to get old, I did add gaming elements which are meant to be delayed so that it get new features rather than having it all at once and getting bored after a little while. Plus, it's an endless game so the idea is you never get bored, because you're supposed to stop when you do get fed up of it as it's your choice.

If you got bored within 5 minutes, fair enough. But if you played it for a while (and got to build most of the different buildings, experimented with some different styles of cities and changed the advisor) you may have thought it was less old.

So, it doesn't deserve a full 10 points off? Perhaps less.

I wouldn't get bored within 5 minutes. If you check out my ratings system, 40/50 in
gameplay means it's fun for at least an hour. But actually you make a really good point. I'll change it from 40/50 to 45/50.

medog wrote:

Svega006 wrote:

Please review my game 2-player tank wars

2 PLAYER TANK WARS

Graphics
30/50; Pretty simple, but it's cool that the tanks can change costumes!

Script Quality
50/50; Definitely the best part of the game, the scripts make amazing features that keep the game interesting.

Game Concept
35/50; soooo many like it, but that doesn't stop it from cutting through and making new and cool unseen features!

Gameplay
40/50; As long as the bullets don't cause too much damage, this is a very decent and fun game to play! Fun for at least half an hour.


Final rating:
155/200; An extremely decent game. Keep it up!

Wow! Thanks! I was expecting like a 90! 

HappyLizard_Inc wrote:

Could you review this? http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/HappyLizard_Inc/2676044 It's still in Alpha, so I'm more curious about what you think about script quality. :p

T3RRA


Graphics
30/50; The player and the background looked cool, but everything else was pretty simple.

Script Quality
30/50; Filled with glitches and bugs. Luckily, most of them are minor (and I still haven't made a successful platform game yet.)

Game Concept
20/50; Pretty much like any other platform game. This would have gotten a higher rating if the lasers had any use (I didn't see anything, if there is, please tell me).

Gameplay
25/50; This could have been 40/50 or even 45/50 if it had more levels. Now, I understand that it's unfinished but 3 levels just isn't enough.

Final Rating
105/200; Overall, a decent game. But pretty glitchy and the lasers aren't necessary because they don't work on anything.

Maybe an updated version would do the trick!

Billybob-Mario wrote:

Can you review Ball Quest? Thanks.

BALL QUEST

Graphics
20/50;  Nothing special, and kind of boring. It's basically just a ball and walls. Many, many walls.

Script Quality
10/50; Obviously the weakest part of the game. The physics barely work and when they do work, you go through the wall. This actually could have been less because I am giving you points for the scrolling effect. Everything else might be the glitchiest I've seen in my Scratch life.

Game Concept
30/50; "Ball Quest" is a nice name, but the actual gameplay's concept steals from quite a few other games.

Gameplay
20/50; The main reason this part has a low score? You guessed it. The glitches. The glitches make it nearly impossible to play and gives you nothing to look forward to in the next level except - More glitches.

Final Rating
80/200; Could use plenty of work. But there are a few cool effects. Other than that, needs to be fixed.

Additional notes:

This game was hard. And not good hard. Frustrating hard.
I basically gave up at level 3 after I fell up through a wall and couldn't come back.
For me, level 1 was the only actually responsive level. Everything else strongly needs to be worked on.

Would you review Tanks-4? I suggest downloading and playing in performance mode.

Can you Re-view this please?

medog wrote:

HappyLizard_Inc wrote:

Could you review this? http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/HappyLizard_Inc/2676044 It's still in Alpha, so I'm more curious about what you think about script quality. :p

T3RRA


Graphics
30/50; The player and the background looked cool, but everything else was pretty simple.

Script Quality
30/50; Filled with glitches and bugs. Luckily, most of them are minor (and I still haven't made a successful platform game yet.)

Game Concept
20/50; Pretty much like any other platform game. This would have gotten a higher rating if the lasers had any use (I didn't see anything, if there is, please tell me).

Gameplay
25/50; This could have been 40/50 or even 45/50 if it had more levels. Now, I understand that it's unfinished but 3 levels just isn't enough.

Final Rating
105/200; Overall, a decent game. But pretty glitchy and the lasers aren't necessary because they don't work on anything.

Maybe an updated version would do the trick!

Ah thanks. As the title says, It's till in Alpha, so many functions don't work yet. But thanks anyway! 

Btw, I'm HappyLizard_Inc

Last edited by Svega006 (2012-09-01 11:10:29)

I would like it if you could review my project.