Scratch

Molybdenum wrote:

For a simple version, its just X: 6*round(mousex/6), same for Y. Not sure for a more complicated version though.

I heard something about it on the wiki.    (soniku3's alt!) 

Molybdenum wrote:

For a simple version, its just X: 6*round(mousex/6), same for Y. Not sure for a more complicated version though.

That's normal grid-locking.

Borrego6165 wrote:

this is an isometric builder with a snap-to grid which is VERY unique because it also allows multiple sized buildings and not only detects whether you stamped one tile but also any tiles surrounding it and allows you to build in more than 1 area instead of having a fixed region Please ask any questions!

hello? here's an epic example!!!

Molybdenum wrote:

Borrego6165 wrote:

Borrego6165 wrote:

this is an isometric builder with a snap-to grid which is VERY unique because it also allows multiple sized buildings and not only detects whether you stamped one tile but also any tiles surrounding it and allows you to build in more than 1 area instead of having a fixed region Please ask any questions!

hello? here's an epic example!!!

You do realize that's sort-of advertising? And I don't think berberberber is on right now.

you showed him yours and it did not snap to a grid so it didn't work! mine does work and it's a great example, it's relevent and not against the rules. no hard feelings

well, it doesn't snap properly to the correct number of pixels

Last edited by Borrego6165 (2012-08-15 15:14:43)

Molybdenum wrote:

Borrego6165 wrote:

Molybdenum wrote:

You do realize that's sort-of advertising? And I don't think berberberber is on right now.

you showed him yours and it did not snap to a grid so it didn't work! mine does work and it's a great example, it's relevent and not against the rules. no hard feelings

well, it doesn't snap properly to the correct number of pixels

Well, it looks a bit like advertising.

And... My example snaps perfectly to a grid. Its just there aren't any gridlines (those 2 are different, even if by just a bit). If you are saying that it goes halfway sometimes, well, its supposed to. Try building up.

EDIT: Oh lookie! Your script uses exactly the same as mine. Mine is 3D, so the halfway up "glitch" is needed. Yours?

on yours you can place blocks directly on top of each other, mine detects that they need to go on the sides, AND it allows multiple sized tiles so although it is not touching an area it detects that the whole area is covered. plus, yours allows on one screen worth, with mine you can scroll and see many areas of placed blocks which can be saved so DAYUM! anway you have one more post then I think we'd best stop

Borrego6165 wrote:

Molybdenum wrote:

Borrego6165 wrote:

you showed him yours and it did not snap to a grid so it didn't work! mine does work and it's a great example, it's relevent and not against the rules. no hard feelings

well, it doesn't snap properly to the correct number of pixels

Well, it looks a bit like advertising.

And... My example snaps perfectly to a grid. Its just there aren't any gridlines (those 2 are different, even if by just a bit). If you are saying that it goes halfway sometimes, well, its supposed to. Try building up.

EDIT: Oh lookie! Your script uses exactly the same as mine. Mine is 3D, so the halfway up "glitch" is needed. Yours?

on yours you can place blocks directly on top of each other, mine detects that they need to go on the sides, AND it allows multiple sized tiles so although it is not touching an area it detects that the whole area is covered. plus, yours allows on one screen worth, with mine you can scroll and see many areas of placed blocks which can be saved so DAYUM! anway you have one more post then I think we'd best stop

The POINT of mine is to place blocks on top of each other, to make a 3D object.
And if you mean you can put blocks were blocks are already are, messing up the picture, I was working on a fix for that. Yours obviously doesn't have it because its 2D.

Last edited by Molybdenum (2012-08-15 16:16:18)

Borrego6165 wrote:

Molybdenum wrote:

Borrego6165 wrote:

on yours you can place blocks directly on top of each other, mine detects that they need to go on the sides, AND it allows multiple sized tiles so although it is not touching an area it detects that the whole area is covered. plus, yours allows on one screen worth, with mine you can scroll and see many areas of placed blocks which can be saved so DAYUM! anway you have one more post then I think we'd best stop

The POINT of mine is to place blocks on top of each other, to make a 3D object.
And if you mean you can put blocks were blocks are already are, messing up the picture, I was working on a fix for that. Yours obviously doesn't have it because its 2D.

it's 2.5D actually, and so's yours. cya

Um, no. Your map editor is 2D. Look, I think we should just stop right now.

PS. Even though I know both definitions (inaccurate and accurate) of 2.5D, here is real 2.5D:

Last edited by Molybdenum (2012-08-15 16:25:23)