Scratch

XenoK · 2012-07-29 16:12:54

777w wrote:
XenoK wrote:
777w wrote:

it was a reference to the fact that all youve really made so far are a few tutorials and some easter art thing which arent very impressive or revolutionizing imo
and yet you still look at our work? They had to have made some sort of impression upon you to keep viewing our projects...
when did i ever say i look at your work? i saw the easter thing because i was curious and i didnt even bother to look at the tutorials. i didnt even know that ilackoriginalitys project was associated with eternity inc when i saw it in the newest projects section

1.) you're here, right?
2.) you've posted in almost all of the eternity incurakai threads, and you are making a statement on tutorials that you claim you've never seen before.

777w · 2012-07-29 16:15:52

XenoK wrote:
777w wrote:
XenoK wrote:

and yet you still look at our work? They had to have made some sort of impression upon you to keep viewing our projects...
when did i ever say i look at your work? i saw the easter thing because i was curious and i didnt even bother to look at the tutorials. i didnt even know that ilackoriginalitys project was associated with eternity inc when i saw it in the newest projects section
1.) you're here, right?
2.) you've posted in almost all of the eternity incurakai threads, and you are making a statement on tutorials that you claim you've never seen before.

frankly i dont think i can tell you why ive posted in your threads without hurting somebodys feelings. and i at least know that the one tutorial ive seen from you was for mesh which has been known of for a long time and already has plenty of tutorials on how to use it therefore meaning it cant be all that revolutionary

ilackoriginality · 2012-07-29 16:18:41

Gosh golly jeepers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

coolhogs · 2012-07-29 16:19:10

Oh great...

Now fights?

Can you guys end this in peace, or the mods will close this...?

XenoK · 2012-07-29 16:19:58

guys, I'll stick around to make another tutorial. ilackoriginality, are we supposed to make our segments in scratch, or actionscript?

ilackoriginality · 2012-07-29 16:20:21

coolhogs wrote:
Oh great...

Now fights?

Can you guys end this in peace, or the mods will close this...?

Not fights.
Stating opinions.
Also why will the mods close a 112-page company thread over some debate

ilackoriginality, are we supposed to make our segments in scratch, or actionscript?

Scratch

i will capture it, import to .swf

Last edited by ilackoriginality (2012-07-29 16:20:43)

777w · 2012-07-29 16:21:35

coolhogs wrote:
Oh great...

Now fights?

Can you guys end this in peace, or the mods will close this...?

sorry, its impossible to make a statement without somebody arguing against it i guess

coolhogs · 2012-07-29 16:21:49

ilackoriginality wrote:
coolhogs wrote:
Oh great...

Now fights?

Can you guys end this in peace, or the mods will close this...?
Not fights.
Stating opinions.
Also why will the mods close a 112-page company thread over some debate

ilackoriginality, are we supposed to make our segments in scratch, or actionscript?
Scratch

i will capture it, import to .swf

Well, it looks like you guys are fighting...

XenoK · 2012-07-29 16:22:16

this is why I discourage outsiders to post in this thread. It only leads to trouble.

ilackoriginality · 2012-07-29 16:22:43

777w wrote:
coolhogs wrote:
Oh great...

Now fights?

Can you guys end this in peace, or the mods will close this...?
sorry, its impossible to make a statement without somebody arguing against it i guess

Inb4 somebody argues with this statement

coolhogs · 2012-07-29 16:23:02

Yeah, it only does... wink

777w · 2012-07-29 16:23:03

XenoK wrote:
this is why I discourage outsiders to post in this thread. It only leads to trouble.

actually i only posted because you asked what i meant :/

ilackoriginality wrote:
777w wrote:
coolhogs wrote:
Oh great...

Now fights?

Can you guys end this in peace, or the mods will close this...?
sorry, its impossible to make a statement without somebody arguing against it i guess
Inb4 somebody argues with this statement

lol

Last edited by 777w (2012-07-29 16:23:30)

ilackoriginality · 2012-07-29 16:24:40

777w wrote:
coolhogs wrote:
Oh great...

Now fights?

Can you guys end this in peace, or the mods will close this...?
sorry, its impossible to make a statement without somebody arguing against it i guess

No It Is Not. This Is Not True. Help I Am Worried These All Caps Will Make Me Explode?!

coolhogs · 2012-07-29 16:26:11

[offtopic]
Ilackoriginality, when will you make SMS 6...?

ilackoriginality · 2012-07-29 16:28:34

coolhogs wrote:
[offtopic]
Ilackoriginality, when will you make SMS 6...?

sPOILrz r transpirnt!!!

It had a segment with the Scratch Cat impersonating Astro as a resolution to the crisis. I have some sketches I did of it when I got back from vacation but am working on super-mega-funny video gmre prodie so I didn't take the time to scan and trace it

Also the Astro segment might not be well-received because of all his fans and he just quit recently basically

^ ignore that, that is all off-topic

XenoK · 2012-07-29 16:29:16

[/offtopic] - take that somewhere else.

77w, you couldve just commented.

ilackoriginality · 2012-07-29 16:31:35

XenoK wrote:
[/offtopic] - take that somewhere else.

It is impossible for me to comment longer than 50 characters because my computer hates Scratch and my other computer hates Scratch. And my laptop.

Also this might not be a good question but I know we are working on the Bon Jovi video, what's the other thing we are working on

777w · 2012-07-29 16:32:35

XenoK wrote:
[/offtopic] - take that somewhere else.

77w, you couldve just commented.

it can take 10 minutes to receive a message so the forums are faster and more efficient efficient? something like that. also, if you can see this stop using ie

Last edited by 777w (2012-07-29 16:32:45)

coolhogs · 2012-07-29 16:34:32

777w wrote:
XenoK wrote:
[/offtopic] - take that somewhere else.

77w, you couldve just commented.
it can take 10 minutes to receive a message so the forums are faster and more efficient efficient? something like that. also, if you can see this stop using ie

+1...
That's why I posted here...

ilackoriginality · 2012-07-29 16:34:58

777w wrote:
efficient? something like that. also, if you can see this stop using ie

the blank line at the end and the "edited by" gave it away so one can simply select it but ok!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Also when we finish this Bon Jovi music video, if it ever gets finished because of the huge technical work it requires, or if it doesn't get finished can we make a Commercial Collab in which we animate parodies of commercials?

not advertising eternity inc. but making parodies of already-existing commercials. or made-up commercials.

777w · 2012-07-29 16:36:23

ilackoriginality wrote:
777w wrote:
efficient? something like that. also, if you can see this stop using ie
the blank line at the end and the "edited by" gave it away so one can simply select it but ok!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

yeah i meant if you can see it without highlighting, although that wouldve looked even more silly

XenoK · 2012-07-29 16:36:50

777w wrote:
XenoK wrote:
[/offtopic] - take that somewhere else.

77w, you couldve just commented.
it can take 10 minutes to receive a message so the forums are faster and more efficient efficient? something like that. also, if you can see this stop using ie

I don't care how long it takes, I want a clean thread here. Next time, just comment. And I'm not using IE.

XenoK · 2012-07-29 16:37:53

[/OFFTOPIC!!!!] I'm totally not going to put up with it. Get back on topic!

ilackoriginality · 2012-07-29 16:38:45

Yeah I tried to bring it back on topic with this:

Also when we finish this Bon Jovi music video, if it ever gets finished because of the huge technical work it requires, or if it doesn't get finished can we make a Commercial Collab in which we animate parodies of commercials?

not advertising eternity inc. but making parodies of already-existing commercials. or made-up commercials.

but ok!!

777w · 2012-07-29 16:38:51

XenoK wrote:
777w wrote:
XenoK wrote:
[/offtopic] - take that somewhere else.

77w, you couldve just commented.
it can take 10 minutes to receive a message so the forums are faster and more efficient efficient? something like that. also, if you can see this stop using ie
I don't care how long it takes, I want a clean thread here. Next time, just comment. And I'm not using IE.

hey man i like speedy communication. and i meant if you could see without highlighting because transparent text doesnt work in ie

Scratch

archived forums

#2776 2012-07-29 16:12:54

Re: Eternity Incurakai

777w wrote:

XenoK wrote:

777w wrote:

#2777 2012-07-29 16:15:52

Re: Eternity Incurakai

XenoK wrote:

777w wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#2778 2012-07-29 16:18:41

Re: Eternity Incurakai

#2779 2012-07-29 16:19:10

Re: Eternity Incurakai

#2780 2012-07-29 16:19:58

Re: Eternity Incurakai

#2781 2012-07-29 16:20:21

Re: Eternity Incurakai

coolhogs wrote:

#2782 2012-07-29 16:21:35

Re: Eternity Incurakai

coolhogs wrote:

#2783 2012-07-29 16:21:49

Re: Eternity Incurakai

ilackoriginality wrote:

coolhogs wrote:

#2784 2012-07-29 16:22:16

Re: Eternity Incurakai

#2785 2012-07-29 16:22:43

Re: Eternity Incurakai

777w wrote:

coolhogs wrote:

#2786 2012-07-29 16:23:02

Re: Eternity Incurakai

#2787 2012-07-29 16:23:03

Re: Eternity Incurakai

XenoK wrote:

ilackoriginality wrote:

777w wrote:

coolhogs wrote:

#2788 2012-07-29 16:24:40

Re: Eternity Incurakai

777w wrote:

coolhogs wrote:

#2789 2012-07-29 16:26:11

Re: Eternity Incurakai

#2790 2012-07-29 16:28:34

Re: Eternity Incurakai

coolhogs wrote:

#2791 2012-07-29 16:29:16

Re: Eternity Incurakai

#2792 2012-07-29 16:31:35

Re: Eternity Incurakai

XenoK wrote:

#2793 2012-07-29 16:32:35

Re: Eternity Incurakai

XenoK wrote:

#2794 2012-07-29 16:34:32

Re: Eternity Incurakai

777w wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#2795 2012-07-29 16:34:58

Re: Eternity Incurakai

777w wrote:

#2796 2012-07-29 16:36:23

Re: Eternity Incurakai

ilackoriginality wrote:

777w wrote:

#2797 2012-07-29 16:36:50

Re: Eternity Incurakai

777w wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#2798 2012-07-29 16:37:53

Re: Eternity Incurakai

#2799 2012-07-29 16:38:45

Re: Eternity Incurakai

#2800 2012-07-29 16:38:51

Re: Eternity Incurakai