ExtremelyGamer wrote:
green23 wrote:
ExtremelyGamer wrote:
They are not reviewing at the moment, only me now, as they are either too busy or on holiday.Well you thought wrong ExtremlyGamer!!!
Where were you?
Somewhere.
BTW, have you seen my new criteria?
Offline
green23 wrote:
ExtremelyGamer wrote:
green23 wrote:
Well you thought wrong ExtremlyGamer!!!Where were you?
Somewhere.
BTW, have you seen my new criteria?
Yep! Looks good... Can you maybe have it out of 100, so we can have the same numbers?
Offline
ExtremelyGamer wrote:
green23 wrote:
ExtremelyGamer wrote:
Where were you?Somewhere.
BTW, have you seen my new criteria?Yep! Looks good... Can you maybe have it out of 100, so we can have the same numbers?
Multiply the score by 4 to get 100...
Offline
green23 wrote:
ExtremelyGamer wrote:
green23 wrote:
Somewhere.
BTW, have you seen my new criteria?Yep! Looks good... Can you maybe have it out of 100, so we can have the same numbers?
Multiply the score by 4 to get 100...
But then you only get 1 in 4 of the scores! Can you multiply the criteria by 4?
Offline
ExtremelyGamer wrote:
green23 wrote:
ExtremelyGamer wrote:
Yep! Looks good (and tasty)... Can you maybe have it out of 100, so we can have the same numbers (and food)?
Multiply the score by 4 to get 100...
But then you only get 1 in 4 of the scores! Can you multiply the criteria by 4?
Multiply the overall score by 4...
Last edited by green23 (2012-07-20 14:05:07)
Offline
green23 wrote:
ExtremelyGamer wrote:
green23 wrote:
Multiply the score by 4 to get 100...But then you only get 1 in 4 of the scores! Can you multiply the criteria by 4?
Multiply the overall score by 4...
Look, this is what I mean, if you have 18/25, then it's 72/100, hence you can't get any number that is not a multiple of 4.
Offline
ExtremelyGamer wrote:
green23 wrote:
ExtremelyGamer wrote:
But then you only get 1 in 4 of the scores! Can you multiply the criteria by 4?Multiply the overall score by 4...
Look, this is what I mean, if you have 18/25, then it's 72/100, hence you can't get any number that is not a multiple of 4.
I know...
But the criteria has to be good...
Offline
rlojunior wrote:
This is a casual game project:
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/rlojunior/2684997
I'll be greatful if you see my project.
Originality: 8/10
I'd say that the idea is very original, but it doesn't have that many unique elements.
Graphics: 8/10
The graphics are simple, but they're pretty empty. I mean there's not much you see.
Programming: 8/10
The game's programming is simple. Though it is not clear even with the instructions. There's a glitch of that if you click the arrow keys after the end time, you still get points.
Sound: 1/10
There's no sound.
Difficulty (6/10), length (7/10), control (10/10): 7/10
The game's unclear and I don't really get the game. The length is okay, it has a title page and ending, but is pretty short when I played it. The control is great, just clicking the start or instructions and relax your hand on the arrow keys.
Extra points I'd give you: 35/50
The game's very original, though it the continuation of the progress of the game is needed. Continue to add, change and replace! You are free to ask for a second review, when ever you feel like it!
OVERALL: 67/100
Offline
iNKGaming wrote:
Not sure if this is quite how I go about this, but if you would be so kind as to review this game I've created that would be absolutely lovely. http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/iNKGaming/2683429
- iNK
Addictiveness: 5/5
I loved it!
Programming: 4/5
Very organized, though there were some loose blocks.
Controls: 5/5
Great!
Graphics and Sound: 4/5
The spaceships could have been a teeny bit brighter. Other than that, perfect!
Theme: 5/5
Everything fit in.
Overall: 24/25 (96/100)
Very good! Very nice for a first project. It was great!!!
Criteria:
1/5: Needs lots of improvement and work...
2/5: Still working, needs some improvement
3/5: Your doing great! Keep going! You almost meets the standard.
4/5: Great job! Your there! Keep up the good work!
5/5: Exceptional quality! Expert stuff.
Offline
iNKGaming wrote:
Not that I wish to take any points away from myself, but shouldn't that be 23/25? 2x4+3x5 = 23, not 24. Anyhow, thanks for reviewing, I really appreciate it.
- iNK
Oh
Offline
Can you review my project? http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Blitz_/2670896
FlashCraft!
Offline
Blitz_ wrote:
Can you review my project? http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Blitz_/2670896
FlashCraft!
Addictiveness: 4/5
Very nice! Just update it and it will be very addicting!
Programming: 3/5
There were some disorganized scripts...
There are also a few glitches such as falling through the iron block.
Controls: 5/5
(No comment)
Graphics and Sound: 3/5
There was no sound but the graphics were great!
Theme: 5/5
The theme was very great!
Overall: 20/25
The game was good but it just needs a few updates to become really great.
Criteria:
1/5: Needs lots of improvement and work...
2/5: Still working, needs some improvement
3/5: Your doing great! Keep going! You almost meets the standard.
4/5: Great job! Your there! Keep up the good work!
5/5: Exceptional quality! Expert stuff.
Offline
Hi this is just a little game i made could you please review it?
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/bieberfever13/2621676
Offline
bieberfever13 wrote:
Hi this is just a little game i made could you please review it?
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/bieberfever13/2621676
Addictiveness: 3/5
The game was okay...
Programming: 4/5
There was a major glitch.
Controls: 4/5
(No comment)
Graphics and Sound: 2/5
The sound were all from scratch examples (Except for the voicing) and the songs didn't really match up. Also the some of the graphics weren't very good. Nice photos though!
Theme: 3/5
The theme was a little confusing.
Overall: 16/25 (64/100)
You could use a bit of improving. Keep improving it!
Criteria:
1/5: Needs lots of improvement and work...
2/5: Still working, still needs some improvement
3/5: Your doing great! Keep going! You almost meets the standard.
4/5: Great job! Your there! Keep up the good work!
5/5: Exceptional quality! Expert stuff.
Offline
green23 wrote:
bieberfever13 wrote:
Hi this is just a little game i made could you please review it?
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/bieberfever13/2621676Addictiveness: 3/5
The game was okay...
Programming: 4/5
There was a major glitch.
Controls: 4/5
(No comment)
Graphics and Sound: 2/5
The sound were all from scratch examples (Except for the voicing) and the songs didn't really match up. Also the some of the graphics weren't very good. Nice photos though!
Theme: 3/5
The theme was a little confusing.
Overall: 16/25 (64/100)
You could use a bit of improving. Keep improving it!
Criteria:
1/5: Needs lots of improvement and work...
2/5: Still working, still needs some improvement
3/5: Your doing great! Keep going! You almost meets the standard.
4/5: Great job! Your there! Keep up the good work!
5/5: Exceptional quality! Expert stuff.
thanks for reviweing ill work on it!
Offline
bluecat600 wrote:
ExtremelyGamer wrote:
bluecat600 wrote:
review one of mine!
Tell me which one! I'm not the best at picking...
review my first project
Fruit Chop 1.4 (I think I already did this, but you wanted me to review your first project, which was fruit chop 1.0, so I reviewed the latest version now with the updated scoring system):
Originality: 5/10
Has all the aspects in Fruit Ninja, so is not original.
Graphics: 7/10
The graphics are ok, but not too accurate and not eye-catching.
Programming: 9/10
the programming is very good, but all the fruit flow up to the top of the screen, I think it should be random.
Sound: 7/10
Could use some better music and sounds. Overall they're okay.
Difficulty (8/10), length (8/10), control (10/10): 8/10
The difficulty is a bit too easy, you should have the bombs to restart the game. The length of it is short and boring, maybe needs some extra modes and stuff like that. The control is very simple and easy.
Extra Points I'd give you: 40/50
The game's okay, but it needs to be updated. Not much unique stuff there is. All of the criteria needs improvement. It is not too addicting, but overall, it's a good game.
OVERALL: 76/100
Offline
Sorry, guys, I know I said Tanks-4 was coming soon, but it got seriously delayed due to random stuff I forgot I needed to do, work with collabs. et cetera, but it will still come out. Sorry!
Offline
sonicfan12p wrote:
Sorry, guys, I know I said Tanks-4 was coming soon, but it got seriously delayed due to random stuff I forgot I needed to do, work with collabs. et cetera, but it will still come out. Sorry!
No problem! We can wait for you as long as possible.
Offline
OK guys I am so sorry about me being off so often but I am back on scratch and ready to roll so keep the reviews coming in!
Offline