Scratch

Haiming · 2012-05-15 20:25:50

Support, but in Scratch 2.0, you can make your own blocks.

ImagineIt · 2012-05-15 20:48:23

Haiming wrote:
Support, but in Scratch 2.0, you can make your own blocks.

People will be able to look at how the block was made...

ImagineIt · 2012-05-15 20:49:29

frogger3140 wrote:
This is a solution where you can't retrieve the swear words unless by source code.
if <(answer) contains a swear word>
say [Don't cuss.] 
else
say [Yay.]
end
But still, I don't like the idea of an inappropriate language block because it may create disrespect, especially by translators since they'd have to translate swear words into their foreign language.

Umm... The workaround wont work because it would need to have a list of swears in-game.

Mokat · 2012-05-25 20:08:40

slayerrobe7 wrote:
trinary wrote:
There are ways to circumvent this.

Imagine 'Scratch' was a profanity.

Users could type:

S.C.R.A.T.C.H
SCR_ATCH
5RA7CH
SSCCRRAATTCHH

etc.
they can do that on the forums that is the point of moderation this is just a back up it does the basics

Or....
CHlCKEN
(you can use a lowercase "l" instead of an I)

ftf841 · 2012-05-25 20:14:32

support

Kangahero · 2012-05-25 20:51:45

This could be easily avoided with a few @'s, $'s, !'s, and *'s. tongue Other than that I'm in! smile

sanjayraj · 2012-05-26 11:50:45

I agree with jji7skyline that scratch would contain innapropriate words.

Last edited by sanjayraj (2012-05-26 12:02:31)

fetchydog567 · 2012-05-28 01:52:52

I swear I would like that.

Mokat_Test · 2012-05-28 11:03:53

frogger3140 wrote:
But still, I don't like the idea of an inappropriate language block because it may create disrespect, especially by translators since they'd have to translate swear words into their foreign language.

Yeah, in the German forums the censor is a bit overly aggressive.

veggieman001 · 2012-05-28 11:06:25

jji7skyline wrote:
I don't think that will be very useful. Also, the swear words would be in the source.

There are swear words in the source of ScratchR.

3sal2 · 2012-05-28 11:24:01

trinary wrote:
There are ways to circumvent this.

Imagine 'Scratch' was a profanity.

Users could type:

S.C.R.A.T.C.H
SCR_ATCH
5RA7CH
SSCCRRAATTCHH

etc.

What makes that inappropriate?

3sal2 · 2012-05-28 11:31:12

What about the Scratch Wiki? Suppose a user types up "*!" in huge brown text on his user page. There should be an edit filter to prevent swear edits (edits containing bad words). On Wikipedia there is such a filter (filter 384). I agree.

ethan5135 · 2012-06-01 20:50:08

I think that there should be a aware word block with translations like this:

ask [Type your message here:] and wait
when gf clicked
if <Inappropriate language is found in :<answer>>
say [Hey, no inappropriate language!] for (2) secs
end

BLU_Spy · 2012-06-01 23:05:15

I completely unsupport this.

There are lots of ways to beat that system, so it‘s useless.

My opinion. tongue

trinary · 2012-06-01 23:17:40

3sal2 wrote:
trinary wrote:
There are ways to circumvent this.

Imagine 'Scratch' was a profanity.

Users could type:

S.C.R.A.T.C.H
SCR_ATCH
5RA7CH
SSCCRRAATTCHH

etc.
What makes that inappropriate?

Replace 'Scratch' with a profanity of your choice.
There are many ways to circumvent filters.

funelephant · 2012-06-01 23:34:10

jji7skyline wrote:
I don't think that will be very useful. Also, the swear words would be in the source.

3sal2 · 2012-06-07 17:51:18

frogger3140 wrote:
This is a solution where you can't retrieve the swear words unless by source code.
if <(answer) contains a swear word>
say [Don't cuss.] 
else
say [Yay.]
end
But still, I don't like the idea of an inappropriate language block because it may create disrespect, especially by translators since they'd have to translate swear words into their foreign language.

This would be an Operators Block.

3sal2 · 2012-06-07 17:54:37

frogger3140 wrote:
This is a solution where you can't retrieve the swear words unless by source code.
if <(answer) contains a swear word>
say [Don't cuss.] 
else
say [Yay.]
end
But still, I don't like the idea of an inappropriate language block because it may create disrespect, especially by translators since they'd have to translate swear words into their foreign language.

This would be an Operators Block. 123abcfalseAND>randomsqrtround+6f

TorbyFork234 · 2012-06-07 17:56:35

BLU_Spy wrote:
I completely unsupport this.

There are lots of ways to beat that system, so it‘s useless.

My opinion.

But they implemented it in the forums. They thought it was useful enough to put it in the forums.

funelephant · 2012-06-08 07:33:53

TorbyFork234 wrote:
BLU_Spy wrote:
I completely unsupport this.

There are lots of ways to beat that system, so it‘s useless.

My opinion.
But they implemented it in the forums. They thought it was useful enough to put it in the forums.

Yes, because there is a system in the forums to do it -_-

wolvesstar97 · 2012-06-08 13:21:31

I support, I actually was going to suggest something like this. My idea was that all cloud variables/lists would have an automatic curse filter that could be turned on or off.

scratchisthebest · 2012-06-09 15:33:30

I don't think the blocks would be a good idea because someone might not use the block and therefore skip censoring.

macintoshosmaker · 2012-07-02 09:27:01

I think that if people were trying to do inappropriate things to the lists, they would just use the delete all block. if you saw a bad word on the list, you could ban them. i think that you should have parental controls, so that you can ban all editing, except for yourself , have only you and your friends be able to edit, everyone be able to edit, and then be able to specify editing to adding, deleting, or veiwing. then if you see someone act up, you can blacklist them

Scratch

archived forums

#26 2012-05-15 20:25:50

Re: inappropriate language block

#27 2012-05-15 20:48:23

Re: inappropriate language block

Haiming wrote:

#28 2012-05-15 20:49:29

Re: inappropriate language block

frogger3140 wrote:

#29 2012-05-25 20:08:40

Re: inappropriate language block

slayerrobe7 wrote:

trinary wrote:

#30 2012-05-25 20:14:32

Re: inappropriate language block

#31 2012-05-25 20:51:45

Re: inappropriate language block

#32 2012-05-26 11:50:45

Re: inappropriate language block

#33 2012-05-28 01:52:52

Re: inappropriate language block

#34 2012-05-28 11:03:53

Re: inappropriate language block

frogger3140 wrote:

#35 2012-05-28 11:06:25

Re: inappropriate language block

jji7skyline wrote:

#36 2012-05-28 11:24:01

Re: inappropriate language block

trinary wrote:

#37 2012-05-28 11:31:12

Re: inappropriate language block

#38 2012-06-01 20:50:08

Re: inappropriate language block

#39 2012-06-01 23:05:15

Re: inappropriate language block

#40 2012-06-01 23:17:40

Re: inappropriate language block

3sal2 wrote:

trinary wrote:

#41 2012-06-01 23:34:10

Re: inappropriate language block

jji7skyline wrote:

#42 2012-06-07 17:51:18

Re: inappropriate language block

frogger3140 wrote:

#43 2012-06-07 17:54:37

Re: inappropriate language block

frogger3140 wrote:

#44 2012-06-07 17:56:35

Re: inappropriate language block

BLU_Spy wrote:

#45 2012-06-08 07:33:53

Re: inappropriate language block

TorbyFork234 wrote:

BLU_Spy wrote:

#46 2012-06-08 13:21:31

Re: inappropriate language block

#47 2012-06-09 15:33:30

Re: inappropriate language block

#48 2012-07-02 09:27:01

Re: inappropriate language block

Board footer