Scratch

soupoftomato · 2012-06-21 15:55:10

Uhm, every serious programming language can be used to cause some sort of harm to you device.

And it doesn't matter if you can't get it on mobile because mobile stuff isn't good at internet or gaming anyway.

ilackoriginality · 2012-06-21 16:21:54

trying to get half the world to uninstall Flash Player is a pretty pretentious goal. inb4 somebody responds with copy-and-pasted text

777w · 2012-06-21 16:24:29

ilackoriginality wrote:
trying to get half the world to uninstall Flash Player is a pretty pretentious goal. inb4 somebody responds with copy-and-pasted text

that was clever the first time but dont go overboard with it

Andres-Vander · 2012-06-21 17:05:22

XenoK wrote:
joletole wrote:
I am totally not doing this. Flash is wayyyyyyy faster. And if I unistall it, I won't be able to watch projects in 2.0.
which is why if everyone does it, the scratch team will notice their mistake and switch it. When 2.0 comes, I'm probably going to have to quit because I'm not using flash under any circumstances. Until HTML5 becomes an option, I will not use scratch.

Does that mean Eternity Inc is over before it even got started?

nama · 2012-06-21 18:46:15

What about the hard-working flash animators of the web?

Last edited by nama (2012-06-21 18:46:24)

GameHutSoftware · 2012-06-21 19:04:53

Flash costs $600. People aren't gonna uninstall it just because a couple of kids are hating on it.

As for the Flash Player, don't you play online games? Chances are they're written in Flash.

Last edited by GameHutSoftware (2012-06-21 19:07:19)

veggieman001 · 2012-06-21 19:14:07

GameHutSoftware wrote:
Flash costs $600. People aren't gonna uninstall it just because a couple of kids are hating on it.

As for the Flash Player, don't you play online games? Chances are they're written in Flash.

It's referring mainly to the player, I believe.

Laternenpfahl · 2012-06-21 19:31:21

I'll send my friends this link

That would be like 2 people tongue

nama · 2012-06-21 20:36:47

GameHutSoftware wrote:
Flash costs $600. People aren't gonna uninstall it just because a couple of kids are hating on it.

As for the Flash Player, don't you play online games? Chances are they're written in Flash.

Exactly. As I said,

nama wrote:
What about the hard-working flash animators of the web? yes i am one of them...

Last edited by nama (2012-06-21 20:38:12)

ilackoriginality · 2012-06-21 21:23:17

777w wrote:
ilackoriginality wrote:
trying to get half the world to uninstall Flash Player is a pretty pretentious goal. inb4 somebody responds with copy-and-pasted text
that was clever the first time but dont go overboard with it

what was clever the first time

777w · 2012-06-21 21:35:40

ilackoriginality wrote:
777w wrote:
ilackoriginality wrote:
trying to get half the world to uninstall Flash Player is a pretty pretentious goal. inb4 somebody responds with copy-and-pasted text
that was clever the first time but dont go overboard with it
what was clever the first time

the "copy-and-pasted text" thing

XenoK · 2012-06-21 22:08:51

Andres-Vander wrote:
XenoK wrote:
joletole wrote:
I am totally not doing this. Flash is wayyyyyyy faster. And if I unistall it, I won't be able to watch projects in 2.0.
which is why if everyone does it, the scratch team will notice their mistake and switch it. When 2.0 comes, I'm probably going to have to quit because I'm not using flash under any circumstances. Until HTML5 becomes an option, I will not use scratch.
Does that mean Eternity Inc is over before it even got started?

LOLOLOL! I can't believe you fell for that! I'm kidding, I'll use flash so long that it doesn't become a problem for my users. You're so gullible! Why would I end Eternity Incurakai just because i disliked a stupid little plugin? You must really hate Eternity Inc. that bad. We have almost 60 pages of posts, where do you get the idea that it hasnt started?

soupoftomato · 2012-06-21 22:23:05

XenoK wrote:
Andres-Vander wrote:
XenoK wrote:

which is why if everyone does it, the scratch team will notice their mistake and switch it. When 2.0 comes, I'm probably going to have to quit because I'm not using flash under any circumstances. Until HTML5 becomes an option, I will not use scratch.
Does that mean Eternity Inc is over before it even got started?
LOLOLOL! I can't believe you fell for that! I'm kidding, I'll use flash so long that it doesn't become a problem for my users. You're so gullible! Why would I end Eternity Incurakai just because i disliked a stupid little plugin? You must really hate Eternity Inc. that bad. We have almost 60 pages of posts, where do you get the idea that it hasnt started?

Popular theory states because that's how you would view your website if it uses flash.

XenoK · 2012-06-21 22:31:36

soupoftomato wrote:
XenoK wrote:
Andres-Vander wrote:

Does that mean Eternity Inc is over before it even got started?
LOLOLOL! I can't believe you fell for that! I'm kidding, I'll use flash so long that it doesn't become a problem for my users. You're so gullible! Why would I end Eternity Incurakai just because i disliked a stupid little plugin? You must really hate Eternity Inc. that bad. We have almost 60 pages of posts, where do you get the idea that it hasnt started?
Popular theory states because that's how you would view your website if it uses flash.

Hey! Im just here sharing the website. If scratch is in flash, i'm completely fine with that. I wanted to see a particular person's reaction to what I said. Looks like i proved my hypothesis right.

XenoK · 2012-06-21 22:37:28

nama wrote:
GameHutSoftware wrote:
Flash costs $600. People aren't gonna uninstall it just because a couple of kids are hating on it.

As for the Flash Player, don't you play online games? Chances are they're written in Flash.
Exactly. As I said,
nama wrote:
What about the hard-working flash animators of the web? yes i am one of them...

Actually, i dont waste my time on the internet playing games. I'd much rather develop them. But thats beside the point. I'm just showing you the website!

TorbyFork234 · 2012-06-21 22:41:52

XenoK wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
XenoK wrote:

LOLOLOL! I can't believe you fell for that! I'm kidding, I'll use flash so long that it doesn't become a problem for my users. You're so gullible! Why would I end Eternity Incurakai just because i disliked a stupid little plugin? You must really hate Eternity Inc. that bad. We have almost 60 pages of posts, where do you get the idea that it hasnt started?
Popular theory states because that's how you would view your website if it uses flash.
Hey! Im just here sharing the website. If scratch is in flash, i'm completely fine with that. I wanted to see a particular person's reaction to what I said. Looks like i proved my hypothesis right.

So this whole topic was for nothing?

XenoK · 2012-06-21 22:54:31

TorbyFork234 wrote:
XenoK wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:

Popular theory states because that's how you would view your website if it uses flash.
Hey! Im just here sharing the website. If scratch is in flash, i'm completely fine with that. I wanted to see a particular person's reaction to what I said. Looks like i proved my hypothesis right.
So this whole topic was for nothing?

Theres always a reason for something regardless of whether it is good or bad from one's perspective.

I wasnt the one who started the debate. Honestly, i had no idea it'd turn into this.

TorbyFork234 · 2012-06-21 23:25:17

XenoK wrote:
TorbyFork234 wrote:
XenoK wrote:

Hey! Im just here sharing the website. If scratch is in flash, i'm completely fine with that. I wanted to see a particular person's reaction to what I said. Looks like i proved my hypothesis right.
So this whole topic was for nothing?
Theres always a reason for something regardless of whether it is good or bad from one's perspective.

I wasnt the one who started the debate. Honestly, i had no idea it'd turn into this.

You were the one who participated the most in the debate. And, in this quote:

XenoK wrote:
Hey! Im just here sharing the website. If scratch is in flash, i'm completely fine with that. I wanted to see a particular person's reaction to what I said. Looks like i proved my hypothesis right.

Your saying that you said all of this, just to get a reaction out of what I'm assuming is Andres-Vander.

backspace_ · 2012-06-21 23:38:22

XenoK wrote:
TorbyFork234 wrote:
XenoK wrote:

Hey! Im just here sharing the website. If scratch is in flash, i'm completely fine with that. I wanted to see a particular person's reaction to what I said. Looks like i proved my hypothesis right.
So this whole topic was for nothing?
Theres always a reason for something regardless of whether it is good or bad from one's perspective.

I wasnt the one who started the debate. Honestly, i had no idea it'd turn into this.

First, to jump into the topic of the discussion I'd like to insert a "Cool Story Bro" into the attempts to remove Flash from existence. Heehee, that's a good one.

Second, I would like to point out that while you're trying to make yourself seem cuddly and innocent, it's kind of not working, due to the fact that you're purposefully targeting people and uh being generally pretentious in my honest opinion. Just a little bit of insight as to why you might get a warning from the ST or something :\

Agentpieface · 2012-06-22 02:47:45

XenoK wrote:
Andres-Vander wrote:
XenoK wrote:
which is why if everyone does it, the scratch team will notice their mistake and switch it. When 2.0 comes, I'm probably going to have to quit because I'm not using flash under any circumstances. Until HTML5 becomes an option, I will not use scratch.
Does that mean Eternity Inc is over before it even got started?
LOLOLOL! I can't believe you fell for that! I'm kidding, I'll use flash so long that it doesn't become a problem for my users. You're so gullible!

that's a hilarious joke

xeno, you are starting to get on my nerves, and frankly I think the majority of scratchers that are actually on these forums would agree

if you really were planning on leaving, I wouldn't have tried to convince you not to, like I do with most other scratchers, I would have simply let you.

Last edited by Agentpieface (2012-06-22 05:44:43)

ShotgunSam · 2012-06-22 03:21:44

XenoK wrote:
Hey! Im just here sharing the website. If scratch is in flash, i'm completely fine with that. I wanted to see a particular person's reaction to what I said. Looks like i proved my hypothesis right.

so u uh did this hole thing just to harrass some user?
thats not nice maybe u should leave afterall

Last edited by ShotgunSam (2012-06-22 03:22:53)

Paddle2See · 2012-06-22 05:55:02

XenoK wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
XenoK wrote:

LOLOLOL! I can't believe you fell for that! I'm kidding, I'll use flash so long that it doesn't become a problem for my users. You're so gullible! Why would I end Eternity Incurakai just because i disliked a stupid little plugin? You must really hate Eternity Inc. that bad. We have almost 60 pages of posts, where do you get the idea that it hasnt started?
Popular theory states because that's how you would view your website if it uses flash.
Hey! Im just here sharing the website. If scratch is in flash, i'm completely fine with that. I wanted to see a particular person's reaction to what I said. Looks like i proved my hypothesis right.

It appears that this topic is being used as some sort of trolling exercise rather than an exchange of viewpoints. That's not what the forums are for so I'll close this now hmm

Scratch

archived forums

#51 2012-06-21 15:55:10

Re: Occupy Flash!

#52 2012-06-21 16:21:54

Re: Occupy Flash!

#53 2012-06-21 16:24:29

Re: Occupy Flash!

ilackoriginality wrote:

#54 2012-06-21 17:05:22

Re: Occupy Flash!

XenoK wrote:

joletole wrote:

#55 2012-06-21 18:46:15

Re: Occupy Flash!

#56 2012-06-21 19:04:53

Re: Occupy Flash!

#57 2012-06-21 19:14:07

Re: Occupy Flash!

GameHutSoftware wrote:

#58 2012-06-21 19:31:21

Re: Occupy Flash!

#59 2012-06-21 20:36:47

Re: Occupy Flash!

GameHutSoftware wrote:

nama wrote:

#60 2012-06-21 21:23:17

Re: Occupy Flash!

777w wrote:

ilackoriginality wrote:

#61 2012-06-21 21:35:40

Re: Occupy Flash!

ilackoriginality wrote:

777w wrote:

ilackoriginality wrote:

#62 2012-06-21 22:08:51

Re: Occupy Flash!

Andres-Vander wrote:

XenoK wrote:

joletole wrote:

#63 2012-06-21 22:23:05

Re: Occupy Flash!

XenoK wrote:

Andres-Vander wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#64 2012-06-21 22:31:36

Re: Occupy Flash!

soupoftomato wrote:

XenoK wrote:

Andres-Vander wrote:

#65 2012-06-21 22:37:28

Re: Occupy Flash!

nama wrote:

GameHutSoftware wrote:

nama wrote:

#66 2012-06-21 22:41:52

Re: Occupy Flash!

XenoK wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#67 2012-06-21 22:54:31

Re: Occupy Flash!

TorbyFork234 wrote:

XenoK wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

#68 2012-06-21 23:25:17

Re: Occupy Flash!

XenoK wrote:

TorbyFork234 wrote:

XenoK wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#69 2012-06-21 23:38:22

Re: Occupy Flash!

XenoK wrote:

TorbyFork234 wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#70 2012-06-22 02:47:45

Re: Occupy Flash!

XenoK wrote:

Andres-Vander wrote: