Scratch

Magnie · 2012-05-02 03:24:09

roijac wrote:
magnie, you're an admin!

funelephant, what we have so far is really little, you can't use it at all actually, so the only reason to grab the source is developing

Odd, cause it keeps saying I'm not authorized to commit. :p

I'll experiment and see if I can get it to work.

slinger · 2012-05-02 05:25:53

Are you guys going to build a .sb compiler using kurt? It would really make your program worth while(not that it isn't already!).
edit: You're probably doing this and I missed it. It's very possible seeing as I said I closed to topics on Coders' Shed and forgot to xD

Last edited by slinger (2012-05-02 05:30:42)

Magnie · 2012-05-02 10:54:24

slinger wrote:
Are you guys going to build a .sb compiler using kurt? It would really make your program worth while(not that it isn't already!).
edit: You're probably doing this and I missed it. It's very possible seeing as I said I closed to topics on Coders' Shed and forgot to xD

It was something we were thinking about. So possibly. smile

slinger · 2012-05-02 13:40:55

Okay! That would be absolutely awesome!

blob8108 · 2012-05-02 14:22:35

slinger wrote:
Are you guys going to build a .sb compiler using kurt? It would really make your program worth while(not that it isn't already!).

In case you're interested; I've been working on a prototype decompiler based on Kurt that exports costumes/backgrounds and scripts to a bunch of image/text files, with a folder for each sprite. There's no GUI, or anything; you can just edit the text files with a text editor.

Now I just need to write the compiler to parse the scripts and folder structure and turn them back into .sb files again (which is the hard part, of course tongue )

slinger · 2012-05-02 14:33:05

Wow, that's purely awesome! I'm looking at learning Python(I'm starting right now in fact!) so I'll look at the source and see how much I can understand tongue

blob8108 · 2012-05-02 14:36:54

slinger wrote:
Wow, that's purely awesome! I'm looking at learning Python(I'm starting right now in fact!) so I'll look at the source and see how much I can understand

I imagine it's not too bad for readability. All the parsing stuff uses Construct, which should help a little. tongue

slinger · 2012-05-02 14:41:36

Cool enough! I'm looking forward to seeing your code smile

slinger · 2012-05-05 08:27:47

Bump

roijac · 2012-05-29 15:35:48

HUGE Builing Up My Program big_smile

So the compiler and the parser are up, some other minor changes, and on the next days I'll start working on the GUI now switching to AGW
I also have some mock-ups of the upcoming design, and let's say they're awesome. They're going to be up on a mock-ups folder on svn this week, so be sure to checkout the repo! tongue

EDIT: 1000th post ;D

Last edited by roijac (2012-05-29 16:08:05)

Magnie · 2012-05-29 22:17:14

roijac wrote:
HUGE Builing Up My Program

So the compiler and the parser are up, some other minor changes, and on the next days I'll start working on the GUI now switching to AGW
I also have some mock-ups of the upcoming design, and let's say they're awesome. They're going to be up on a mock-ups folder on svn this week, so be sure to checkout the repo!

EDIT: 1000th post ;D

Great progress! I saw a lot of emails about you working on it. Keep up the great work!

roijac · 2012-05-30 01:35:36

Magnie wrote:
roijac wrote:
HUGE Builing Up My Program

So the compiler and the parser are up, some other minor changes, and on the next days I'll start working on the GUI now switching to AGW
I also have some mock-ups of the upcoming design, and let's say they're awesome. They're going to be up on a mock-ups folder on svn this week, so be sure to checkout the repo!

EDIT: 1000th post ;D
Great progress! I saw a lot of emails about you working on it. Keep up the great work!

thanks!
#spamfilter tongue

roijac · 2012-06-01 11:03:45

So, the mock-ups are now available exclusively to people that checkout the code tongue
Discuss them here smile

Code:

reminder:
svn checkout svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/m30w/svn

roijac · 2012-06-03 05:26:17

bump?

slinger · 2012-06-05 04:19:56

Bump :3

veggieman001 · 2012-06-05 09:58:04

roijac wrote:
So, the mock-ups are now available exclusively to people that checkout the code
Discuss them here
Code:
reminder:
svn checkout svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/m30w/svn

Um...

roijac · 2012-06-05 10:20:56

veggieman001 wrote:
roijac wrote:
So, the mock-ups are now available exclusively to people that checkout the code
Discuss them here
Code:
reminder:
svn checkout svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/m30w/svn
Um...

cheater tongue

roijac · 2012-06-13 11:49:57

bumping from 2nd page hmm
we now have raw GUI
(and icon) smile

xD

roijac · 2012-06-14 12:10:17

BUMP
didn't anyone even see the screenshot? sad

MathWizz · 2012-06-14 12:38:47

Nice!

Magnie · 2012-06-15 10:12:57

roijac wrote:
BUMP
didn't anyone even see the screenshot?

Let me guess, 'inside' is not a part of the program?

Also, the syntax looks like Python, good work! big_smile

roijac · 2012-06-15 12:59:13

Magnie wrote:
roijac wrote:
BUMP
didn't anyone even see the screenshot?
Let me guess, 'inside' is not a part of the program?

Also, the syntax looks like Python, good work!

nope, nope
i'm still trying to decide how to program the flow control, i think i'll go for custom iterators, so a script can signal the executor to move to another script (for example forever loop)
for example:

Code:

def forever(script):
    script.execute()
    yield

def repeat(times, script):
    for i in range(times):
        script.execute()
        yield

def execute():
    scripts = [repeatscript, foreverscript]
    for index, script in enumerate(scripts):
        try:
            next(script)
        except StopIteration:
            scripts.pop(index)

what do you say?

MathWizz · 2012-06-15 13:06:02

It's not really that easy. The yields are more complicated.

roijac · 2012-06-15 13:19:32

i really hate the fact they never documented the order things execute hmm
it's sometimes soooo bizarre xD
(the thing about broadcasts i'm NOT going to program smile

MathWizz · 2012-06-15 13:38:11

roijac wrote:
i really hate the fact they never documented the order things execute
it's sometimes soooo bizarre xD
(the thing about broadcasts i'm NOT going to program

Heh. I was thinking about that for JsScratch, but then I said "screw that" and moved on. tongue

Scratch

archived forums

#126 2012-05-02 03:24:09

Re: The Return Of M30W

roijac wrote:

#127 2012-05-02 05:25:53

Re: The Return Of M30W

#128 2012-05-02 10:54:24

Re: The Return Of M30W

slinger wrote:

#129 2012-05-02 13:40:55

Re: The Return Of M30W

#130 2012-05-02 14:22:35

Re: The Return Of M30W

slinger wrote:

#131 2012-05-02 14:33:05

Re: The Return Of M30W

#132 2012-05-02 14:36:54

Re: The Return Of M30W

slinger wrote:

#133 2012-05-02 14:41:36

Re: The Return Of M30W

#134 2012-05-05 08:27:47

Re: The Return Of M30W

#135 2012-05-29 15:35:48

Re: The Return Of M30W

#136 2012-05-29 22:17:14

Re: The Return Of M30W

roijac wrote:

#137 2012-05-30 01:35:36

Re: The Return Of M30W

Magnie wrote:

roijac wrote:

#138 2012-06-01 11:03:45

Re: The Return Of M30W

Code:

#139 2012-06-03 05:26:17

Re: The Return Of M30W

#140 2012-06-05 04:19:56

Re: The Return Of M30W

#141 2012-06-05 09:58:04

Re: The Return Of M30W

roijac wrote:

Code:

#142 2012-06-05 10:20:56

Re: The Return Of M30W

veggieman001 wrote:

roijac wrote:

Code:

#143 2012-06-13 11:49:57

Re: The Return Of M30W

#144 2012-06-14 12:10:17

Re: The Return Of M30W

#145 2012-06-14 12:38:47

Re: The Return Of M30W

#146 2012-06-15 10:12:57

Re: The Return Of M30W

roijac wrote:

#147 2012-06-15 12:59:13

Re: The Return Of M30W

Magnie wrote:

roijac wrote:

Code:

#148 2012-06-15 13:06:02

Re: The Return Of M30W

#149 2012-06-15 13:19:32

Re: The Return Of M30W

#150 2012-06-15 13:38:11

Re: The Return Of M30W

roijac wrote:

Board footer