Andres-Vander wrote:
GLaDOS2 wrote:
agscratcher wrote:
If you take piracy, swap the i and r, then add a v after the two, it becomes privacy.
Now you know.
Seriously, Congress, this is the FIFTH (counting S.978, SOPA, PIPA, and ACTA before) TIME you've attempted to violate the Internet. Why can't you learn...?And this means that they'll be using out WEBCAMS to watch what we do.
OH GOD
OH GOD
THEY'LL KNOW ABOUT MY TECHNOLOGY
AND WHERE I LIVE
AND THEY'LL CONFISCATE MY BABIES D8>
((her babies are the turrets))What technology? And it's no secret where you live
Then why don't you show up at Arpeture Science tommorow.
Offline
maxskywalker wrote:
Andres-Vander wrote:
GLaDOS2 wrote:
And this means that they'll be using out WEBCAMS to watch what we do.
OH GOD
OH GOD
THEY'LL KNOW ABOUT MY TECHNOLOGY
AND WHERE I LIVE
AND THEY'LL CONFISCATE MY BABIES D8>
((her babies are the turrets))What technology? And it's no secret where you live
Then why don't you show up at Arpeture Science tommorow.
the only problem with that is that aperture science doesnt exist
if it did, though, it would be located in upper michigan
Offline
illusionist wrote:
You know your parents voted for the guys who are doing this stuff.
My grandma might have but my dad frequents the internet and plays video games and stuff so I would assume he has the sense not to.
Offline
*badoinks thread on topic*
illusionist wrote:
You know your parents voted for the guys who are doing this stuff.
Last time my family voted was like 3 months ago.
Offline
selenamarte wrote:
And privacy I mean from your Facebook password to your credit card number! Great, this is the reason there are FB messages of photos saying there are hackers, Yes, CISPA.
I don't know much about this but I can tell you now that your passwords and credit card details will remain as secure as ever.
((I don't see how this fits here, but okay))
Last edited by RedRocker227 (2012-06-11 18:01:22)
Offline
mythbusteranimator wrote:
Why do they WANT to access everything we do???
To prevent hacking and such, but they don't realize how people feel about their own privacy.
Offline
This is what I think:
Offline
XGamer42 wrote:
This is seriously watergate 2.
Barack Obama is BREAKING THE 4'TH ANDENIMENT(BLAARG) AND NO ONE CARES????
That is wrong.
DOWN WITH BROCCOLI OBAMA
but obama didnt create cispa, did he?
Offline
Mokat wrote:
G0D_M0D3 wrote:
I hope they can't see out of my webcam. Then I'd be very creeped out. I sit here and yell at my computer, and if they can see that...
...we're all dead.O.o
That's creepy
*Grabs black tape and tapes over webcam*
Macs have a little LED that show if the webcam is on or off.
Plus, I'm glad I'm not in the USA for the second time in 6 months.
Offline
I forgot what the fourth admendment is, but i have book on the U.S. documents, i am still looking for the one that gives the right for the people to overthrow the gov't if it is oppressive like it is now.
Offline
Why does the government try to stop these things and just make things worse? I wish the government would know they are just making things worse and making problems and STOP!!!
Offline
XGamer42 wrote:
777w wrote:
XGamer42 wrote:
This is seriously watergate 2.
Barack Obama is BREAKING THE 4'TH ANDENIMENT(BLAARG) AND NO ONE CARES????
That is wrong.
DOWN WITH BROCCOLI OBAMAbut obama didnt create cispa, did he?
he's the president.
The president works with the bills.
See?
If you think the president writes every single bill going through congress then you sir do not have any understanding of how the government works. Why would he threaten to veto his own bill?
Offline
16Skittles wrote:
XGamer42 wrote:
777w wrote:
but obama didnt create cispa, did he?he's the president.
The president works with the bills.
See?If you think the president writes every single bill going through congress then you sir do not have any understanding of how the government works. Why would he threaten to veto his own bill?
I really don't think the president wrote that bill.
Obama is a Democrat, and the bill is Republican sponsored.
Also, like my sig?
Offline
jvvg wrote:
16Skittles wrote:
XGamer42 wrote:
he's the president.
The president works with the bills.
See?If you think the president writes every single bill going through congress then you sir do not have any understanding of how the government works. Why would he threaten to veto his own bill?
I really don't think the president wrote that bill.
Obama is a Democrat, and the bill is Republican sponsored.
Also, like my sig?
Of course Obama didn't write it. He isn't completely stupid, contrary to Republican belief. Now I understand why scratch dislikes political threads:
1. Political thread is started
2. Mature, informed debate
3. People who watch Fox News join in with "facts"
4. Well informed people inform them that their "fact" is a complete lie
5. People with the "facts" insist that they are right
6. Well informed people rage at stupidity
7. Moderators close the topic for flaming.
Last edited by 16Skittles (2012-06-13 14:12:42)
Offline
16Skittles wrote:
Now I understand why scratch dislikes political threads:
1. Political thread is started
2. Mature, informed debate
3. People who watch Fox News join in with "facts"
4. Well informed people inform them that their "fact" is a complete lie
5. People with the "facts" insist that they are right
6. Well informed people rage at stupidity
7. Moderators close the topic for flaming.
Yup. Lets try not to get this closed.
EDIT: I think your comment that Obama "isn't completely stupid, unlike most cogressmen" might be flamebait.
Last edited by nama (2012-06-13 14:17:28)
Offline
nama wrote:
I think your comment that Obama "isn't completely stupid, unlike most cogressmen" might be flamebait.
Yep. Even though Congress has a 9% approval rating, you shouldn't insult them, as they do make laws and are important people.
Offline
Daroach1 wrote:
So, I was just doing random stuff, taking an anti-hacking course, the like, and came across an article about a new SOPA called CISPA, which is an anti-privacy thing. Here is the article I first read about it on http://grassroutes.us/cispa Scary
grassroutes.us wrote:
According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "The bill purports to allow companies and the federal government to share information to prevent or defend from cyberattacks. However, the bill expressly authorizes monitoring of our private communications, and is written so broadly that it allows companies to hand over large swaths of personal information to the government with no judicial oversight... creating a loophole in all existing privacy laws."
We need to do something about this.
SOPA was anti-piracy. This is anti-privacy.
Offline
GameHutSoftware wrote:
Daroach1 wrote:
So, I was just doing random stuff, taking an anti-hacking course, the like, and came across an article about a new SOPA called CISPA, which is an anti-privacy thing. Here is the article I first read about it on http://grassroutes.us/cispa Scary
grassroutes.us wrote:
According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, "The bill purports to allow companies and the federal government to share information to prevent or defend from cyberattacks. However, the bill expressly authorizes monitoring of our private communications, and is written so broadly that it allows companies to hand over large swaths of personal information to the government with no judicial oversight... creating a loophole in all existing privacy laws."
We need to do something about this.
SOPA was anti-piracy. This is anti-privacy.
agscratcher wrote:
If you take piracy, swap the i and r, then add a v after the two, it becomes privacy.
Offline
AvatarAang4 wrote:
I forgot what the fourth admendment is, but i have book on the U.S. documents, i am still looking for the one that gives the right for the people to overthrow the gov't if it is oppressive like it is now.
Who cares where the document saying that is? It's gonna happen, document or no, if this goes on.
Offline
maxskywalker wrote:
AvatarAang4 wrote:
I forgot what the fourth admendment is, but i have book on the U.S. documents, i am still looking for the one that gives the right for the people to overthrow the gov't if it is oppressive like it is now.
Who cares where the document saying that is? It's gonna happen, document or no, if this goes on.
Lol, to overthrow the government you must still follow its rules? Anyway, while the citizens have a better chance of winning a cyberwar, but practically no chance in a true war against the vehicles and tactic of our trained armed forces.
Offline