Scratch

3sal2 wrote:

There's a limitation in HTML that make Booleans look like reporters:

if <not <>>
say (join (timer) <loud?>) for (x position) secs
end

I know there is no way to make the blocks hexagonal with that language. But, what causes it? No vector graphics?

isn't it meant to be like that?

777w wrote:

muppetds wrote:

3sal2 wrote:

There's a limitation in HTML that make Booleans look like reporters:

if <not <>>
say (join (timer) <loud?>) for (x position) secs
end

I know there is no way to make the blocks hexagonal with that language. But, what causes it? No vector graphics?

isn't it meant to be like that?

nope
look at the "not" block there then in scratch 1.4
theres a difference

ah right
Its the same with the scratch blocks demo 

LS97 wrote:

It's not an HTML limitation, but rather I believe a pinch of lazyness from our kind JSO 

yea i thought so as well

SJRCS_011 wrote:

LS97 wrote:

It's not an HTML limitation, but rather I believe a pinch of lazyness from our kind JSO 

It's a CSS limitation actually.  JSO was trying to figure out a way to have the pointed edges with all browsers (as we all should know, IE has some problems with standards compliance)

IE doesn't do border-radius well anyways.

I think he should just do vector triangles.

scimonster wrote:

SJRCS_011 wrote:

LS97 wrote:

It's not an HTML limitation, but rather I believe a pinch of lazyness from our kind JSO 

It's a CSS limitation actually.  JSO was trying to figure out a way to have the pointed edges with all browsers (as we all should know, IE has some problems with standards compliance)

IE doesn't do border-radius well anyways.

I think he should just do vector triangles.

ikr?  Maybe he is being lazy 
I actually doubt it, because he has added the cloud vars recently
JSO just needs convincing that vector graphics would work
[joking]
or, even better, he could just recode the entire thing in HTML Canvas!
[/joking]

Last edited by SJRCS_011 (2012-05-28 19:23:32)