kayybee wrote:
Ok, I removed the ads from my sig. I now use tiny.cc instead.
Offline
XenoK wrote:
this isn't spam, but could you see my website: www.eternityinc-official.com, and tell me what you think of it? I could use some feedback.
Putting "this isn't spam" doesn't automatically make it not spam. If you want feedback, ask for it in the official thread about your company.
I'll check out some of the software tomorrow.
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
XenoK wrote:
this isn't spam, but could you see my website: www.eternityinc-official.com, and tell me what you think of it? I could use some feedback.
Putting "this isn't spam" doesn't automatically make it not spam. If you want feedback, ask for it in the official thread about your company.
I'll check out some of the software tomorrow.
1. I totally agree, and I don't want people advertising their own organizations in the thread for mine (except for in sigs, of course)
2. Cool. You'll probably like a lot of it.
Offline
jvvg wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
XenoK wrote:
this isn't spam, but could you see my website: www.eternityinc-official.com, and tell me what you think of it? I could use some feedback.
Putting "this isn't spam" doesn't automatically make it not spam. If you want feedback, ask for it in the official thread about your company.
I'll check out some of the software tomorrow.1. I totally agree, and I don't want people advertising their own organizations in the thread for mine (except for in sigs, of course)
2. Cool. You'll probably like a lot of it.
sorry...
Offline
XenoK wrote:
jvvg wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Putting "this isn't spam" doesn't automatically make it not spam. If you want feedback, ask for it in the official thread about your company.
I'll check out some of the software tomorrow.1. I totally agree, and I don't want people advertising their own organizations in the thread for mine (except for in sigs, of course)
2. Cool. You'll probably like a lot of it.sorry...
It's OK. You can just say you were in the wrong FutureSight
Offline
jvvg wrote:
XenoK wrote:
jvvg wrote:
1. I totally agree, and I don't want people advertising their own organizations in the thread for mine (except for in sigs, of course)
2. Cool. You'll probably like a lot of it.sorry...
It's OK. You can just say you were in the wrong FutureSight
ok. I replied to your email with some screenshots.
Offline
XenoK wrote:
jvvg wrote:
XenoK wrote:
sorry...It's OK. You can just say you were in the wrong FutureSight
ok. I replied to your email with some screenshots.
Got it, and am writing my reply.
Offline
:o
I didn't realize you were him. I remember wanting to join ya'll a long time ago. And I actually was about to join but then something strange happened - I don't remember. Ls had asked me if I wanted to join.
Well, cool. Now I know more about you than I thought I did.
Offline
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
:o
I didn't realize you were him. I remember wanting to join ya'll a long time ago. And I actually was about to join but then something strange happened - I don't remember. Ls had asked me if I wanted to join.
Well, cool. Now I know more about you than I thought I did.
You are in my Skype contacts, but I never see you online.
Also, you must have asked LS about joining, not me. I don't remember that.
And you didn't realize I was who? Jacob?
Offline
I'm having trouble installing Insanity. I run the installation thingy, and then nothing happens. I've searched "Insanity" and nothing comes up (apart from the installer).
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
I'm having trouble installing Insanity. I run the installation thingy, and then nothing happens. I've searched "Insanity" and nothing comes up (apart from the installer).
There's also a files-only version. Try that. And, look for the directory in which you installed it.
Offline
That worked. It's awesome. I love the minor improvements the most actually, like the way you combined all the mathematical blocks into one block with a drop-down menu.
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
That worked. It's awesome. I love the minor improvements the most actually, like the way you combined all the mathematical blocks into one block with a drop-down menu.
Thanks. If you want to continue the discussion about Insanity, please go here.
Offline
jvvg wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
That worked. It's awesome. I love the minor improvements the most actually, like the way you combined all the mathematical blocks into one block with a drop-down menu.
Thanks. If you want to continue the discussion about Insanity, please go here.
Also, since that original block was my idea, you may use the Bingo forums which I closed down a while ago! So yeah
Offline
LS97 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
That worked. It's awesome. I love the minor improvements the most actually, like the way you combined all the mathematical blocks into one block with a drop-down menu.
Thanks. If you want to continue the discussion about Insanity, please go here.
Also, since that original block was my idea, you may use the Bingo forums which I closed down a while ago! So yeah
I programmed it myself, though. And, please put this in the Insanity thread.
Offline
FutureSightTech wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Why'd you delete your post just to post it again?
Waaaait... You're a New Scratcher, you couldn't have delete it. 0_o You definitely posted that before though.Jacob and ls didn't like my old one, so I reported it, and asked for it to be taken down. Then we agrued about what I was going to say, and I posted the above post.
The old one contained some stuff LS and I didn't approve of. The rule we have is that LS and I generally run stuff by each other before posting it if it involves both of us. I guess we forgot to tell Stephen.
Offline
jvvg wrote:
FutureSightTech wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Why'd you delete your post just to post it again?
Waaaait... You're a New Scratcher, you couldn't have delete it. 0_o You definitely posted that before though.Jacob and ls didn't like my old one, so I reported it, and asked for it to be taken down. Then we agrued about what I was going to say, and I posted the above post.
The old one contained some stuff LS and I didn't approve of. The rule we have is that LS and I generally run stuff by each other before posting it if it involves both of us. I guess we forgot to tell Stephen.
It didn't say much of anything bad. :?
Offline
stevetheipad wrote:
jvvg wrote:
FutureSightTech wrote:
Jacob and ls didn't like my old one, so I reported it, and asked for it to be taken down. Then we agrued about what I was going to say, and I posted the above post.The old one contained some stuff LS and I didn't approve of. The rule we have is that LS and I generally run stuff by each other before posting it if it involves both of us. I guess we forgot to tell Stephen.
It didn't say much of anything bad. :?
It was kind of "discrediting" LS97 and me.
Let's drop this issue now, OK?
Offline
Dear Scratchers,
Does anyone have any idea as to what we could make next?
Offline
SJRCS_011 wrote:
A program to convert .sb files to .sb2
That's a very good idea, but the Scratch Team has already thought about it, I think
Offline
LS97 wrote:
SJRCS_011 wrote:
A program to convert .sb files to .sb2
That's a very good idea, but the Scratch Team has already thought about it, I think
Do it before them
It's a challenge
Offline