If we get 5 more post that may lead to fights, MyRedNeptune, JSO, or Lanie please close this thread when this happens.
Offline
SImniel wrote:
Let's just say all your sites fail...
Free website hosting, with premade templates?
Soz, fail
How about code your own forums or website?
Make it not an actual waste of time for others <3
I don't know about that. It is good for lazy people who will probably ditch their site after a few months or for people who can't code.
Offline
archmage wrote:
SImniel wrote:
Let's just say all your sites fail...
Free website hosting, with premade templates?
Soz, fail
How about code your own forums or website?
Make it not an actual waste of time for others <3I don't know about that. It is good for lazy people who will probably ditch their site after a few months or for people who can't code.
Luckily, this won't lead to having a fight. ^ So this topic won't be closed
Offline
ScratchMusicGroup wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
ok first a counter DOES NOT count the number of times your page is clicked on. Yours(i check both of yours) yeah both of you use counters that count the number of times the page is used...you can simple get more views if you just refreshed the page like a bunch of times. So your "40 VIEWS Per Day" is not really 40 views. It's basicly 40 views of that page not the website. So your argument is not right because the Scratch Second Forum's have over 1000 views. So You should change your topic Dibbo because that is not the correct information
no scratchx is right
no he's not.
and i find it hard to believe that that site has over 1000 views. i think that 1000 views is "for that page, not the website"
Offline
Dibbo222 wrote:
ScratchMusicGroup wrote:
ScratchX wrote:
ok first a counter DOES NOT count the number of times your page is clicked on. Yours(i check both of yours) yeah both of you use counters that count the number of times the page is used...you can simple get more views if you just refreshed the page like a bunch of times. So your "40 VIEWS Per Day" is not really 40 views. It's basicly 40 views of that page not the website. So your argument is not right because the Scratch Second Forum's have over 1000 views. So You should change your topic Dibbo because that is not the correct information
no scratchx is right
no he's not.
and i find it hard to believe that that site has over 1000 views. i think that 1000 views is "for that page, not the website"
Agreed. My site would have 300x more views. That's 26,10,00 views.
Offline
Penguinsrock wrote:
Dibbo222 wrote:
ScratchMusicGroup wrote:
no scratchx is rightno he's not.
and i find it hard to believe that that site has over 1000 views. i think that 1000 views is "for that page, not the website"Agreed. My site would have 300x more views. That's 26,10,00 views.
dont exagerate man
Offline