Ok, why don't we all just stop talking about this. You have each proved your points, we don't need to keep arguing over something so silly. Just focus on the accual olyimpics now. End of argument.
Offline
robot_productions1 wrote:
Ok, why don't we all just stop talking about this. You have each proved your points, we don't need to keep arguing over something so silly. Just focus on the accual olyimpics now. End of argument.
What do you think we've been trying to do?
Offline
SteveJobs2 wrote:
Andres-Vander wrote:
ftf841 wrote:
no it's the same because the 3 usa teams don't work together
P.S just stop arguingIf one of them wins, the "US" team would still win though. I just want things to be fair.
I like your nationalism and the sense of pride that you have in your country, but that does not mean that I agree with you on how USA has a 3x chance of winning. I think everyone knows that each individuals nationalities can't be confirmed exactly on Scratch, as everyone is pretty much anonymous and no one knows each other. Therefore I think it is safe to assume that people aren't actually representing a specific country, but rather an idea of a country. However I do think that if one of the three USA teams were to win, it would take away from the overall concept of the USA winning the Scratch Olympics, because as you said they do have more teams. I think that the two other USA teams also won't share in the victory, because they will just competed against each other as much as they are competing against all of the other countries. I also think that your idea of people just picking a random country because theirs is already filled up, is completely contradicting your overall idea of a specific country winning. If I were to choose, say France, and make a Team France, then proceed to win the Scratch Olympics, I wouldn't really be able to say that France won, because I am from the USA. Since I am from the USA, AT LEAST a fifth of that victorious French team would have consisted of people that weren't from France, meaning that France didn't win all-out, it was more a partial victory which would depend on how many people were actually from France that were on the team.
The nationality of people doesn't matter if they're on another country's team. If you did win for France, it would be France winning. When US athletes win for other countries, or Brazilian athletes win for the US etc, the country they represent wins. And yes, that's a thing. You can join a country's Olympic Team if you have family there (not even necessarily).
Offline
deathofdemons wrote:
robot_productions1 wrote:
Ok, why don't we all just stop talking about this. You have each proved your points, we don't need to keep arguing over something so silly. Just focus on the accual olyimpics now. End of argument.
What do you think we've been trying to do?
See? Your still arguing.
Offline
robot_productions1 wrote:
deathofdemons wrote:
robot_productions1 wrote:
Ok, why don't we all just stop talking about this. You have each proved your points, we don't need to keep arguing over something so silly. Just focus on the accual olyimpics now. End of argument.
What do you think we've been trying to do?
See? Your still arguing.
I was just stating a question...don't lash out at me...
Offline
Ok, GoldRock's gone for a just over a month (check out his latest project) and said we need to vote for someone to take over. I suggest beyblade since he is kinda second in command.
Offline
deathofdemons wrote:
robot_productions1 wrote:
deathofdemons wrote:
What do you think we've been trying to do?See? Your still arguing.
I was just stating a question...don't lash out at me...
Well i said end of argument 2 posts ago and you kept replying.
Offline
robot_productions1 wrote:
deathofdemons wrote:
robot_productions1 wrote:
See? Your still arguing.I was just stating a question...don't lash out at me...
Well i said end of argument 2 posts ago and you kept replying.
And u reply back.
Offline
deathofdemons wrote:
Ok, GoldRock's gone for a just over a month (check out his latest project) and said we need to vote for someone to take over. I suggest beyblade since he is kinda second in command.
I to say beyblade, then beyblade will have to pick an assistant.
Offline
robot_productions1 wrote:
deathofdemons wrote:
Ok, GoldRock's gone for a just over a month (check out his latest project) and said we need to vote for someone to take over. I suggest beyblade since he is kinda second in command.
I to say beyblade, then beyblade will have to pick an assistant.
Okay then, if you can't be on for a while then i suggest you not do it but if possible then I'll choose you as assistant!(robot_productions_1)
Last edited by beyblade4 (2012-04-25 18:06:05)
Offline
deathofdemons wrote:
robot_productions1 wrote:
deathofdemons wrote:
I was just stating a question...don't lash out at me...Well i said end of argument 2 posts ago and you kept replying.
And u reply back.
You just did to.
Offline
beyblade4 wrote:
robot_productions1 wrote:
deathofdemons wrote:
Ok, GoldRock's gone for a just over a month (check out his latest project) and said we need to vote for someone to take over. I suggest beyblade since he is kinda second in command.
I to say beyblade, then beyblade will have to pick an assistant.
Okay then, if you can't be on for a while then i suggest you not do it but if possible then I'll choose you as assistant!(robot_productions_1)
Me? Um... ok
Last edited by robot_productions1 (2012-04-25 18:07:29)
Offline
robot_productions1 wrote:
deathofdemons wrote:
robot_productions1 wrote:
Well i said end of argument 2 posts ago and you kept replying.And u reply back.
You just did to.
And you have too (we could go on all day)
Offline
deathofdemons wrote:
robot_productions1 wrote:
deathofdemons wrote:
And u reply back.You just did to.
And you have too (we could go on all day)
And you just did to to
Offline
robot_productions1 wrote:
deathofdemons wrote:
robot_productions1 wrote:
You just did to.And you have too (we could go on all day)
And you just did to to
And you just did to the power of 4.
I best get some rest, you two don't look like u'll need me now, if not ever, so I can kip.
Offline
I don't know what just happened but robot_productions_1 your gonna be my assistant for now and deathofdemons, you work out whatever problems your having with whoever it is somewhere but here.
Last edited by beyblade4 (2012-04-25 21:14:54)
Offline
So I've been kicked out? Cuz of what's happened to me? Fine...
Offline
robot_productions1 wrote:
deathofdemons wrote:
robot_productions1 wrote:
You just did to.And you have too (we could go on all day)
And you just did to to
stop being so childish
Offline
I vote for some moderator who wants to do it to have control. It's not really some big taxing job, so it won't interfere with their moderator duties
Offline
beyblade4 wrote:
I don't know what just happened but robot_productions_1 your gonna be my assistant for now and deathofdemons, you work out whatever problems your having with whoever it is somewhere but here.
Why was death kicked out?
Offline
I can't be here during the 20th - 25th of May. Oh and fix Team GB's link. >:V
Offline
Okay I have a proposal. I'll forget about all of the unfair advantages the US Team has if you let me have banned Scratchers on my team. I know someone who really wants to join Team Canada but they're banned. I don't want this as just a special exception for myself and my team, just make it a rule that anybody can enter. I just want things to be equal for all Scratchers
Offline
Andres-Vander wrote:
Okay I have a proposal. I'll forget about all of the unfair advantages the US Team has if you let me have banned Scratchers on my team. I know someone who really wants to join Team Canada but they're banned. I don't want this as just a special exception for myself and my team, just make it a rule that anybody can enter. I just want things to be equal for all Scratchers
That sounds reasonable! Although you make sound like the USA team's are working together.
Offline
Anyway, I'm back for one post, then I'll be gone again. Here goes:
1. The new manager should create a new thread
2. deathofdemons is not kicked out - if he is, bring him back please
3. I'd like to thank Andres-Vander for his constructive critiscm (yes, I admit it) and I know you were only trying to help
4. You can stop arguing, now Why? Because I say so
5. Continue to expand with the ideas you have!
Thanks... I'll be back...
Offline
GoldRock wrote:
Anyway, I'm back for one post, then I'll be gone again. Here goes:
1. The new manager should create a new thread
2. deathofdemons is not kicked out - if he is, bring him back please
3. I'd like to thank Andres-Vander for his constructive critiscm (yes, I admit it) and I know you were only trying to help
4. You can stop arguing, now Why? Because I say so
5. Continue to expand with the ideas you have!
Thanks... I'll be back...
Okay! I have taken over so I will create a new thread
Offline