Okay guys, post your opinions!
It's either Halo or COD!
Please don't troll each other...........Even though COD sucks...
Offline
I can't say, because I haven't played some of the new CoDs because I don't want to.
Offline
All I know about either is that there are too many little kids on the mic on both
So I'll have to stay out of a discussion about video games for once
Offline
Halo is a little better, but both have been changed for the worst (Reach = Kids screaming their heads off in the mic. MW3 = Easy, deliberate hacking enabling and kids who fail but are high levels.)
Offline
NeilWest wrote:
(Reach = Kids screaming their heads off in the mic.
I agree.
Offline
Neither.
Shooting games suck.
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
Neither.
Shooting games suck.
Tell me, have you played ether one?
Offline
Apples and Pears. Halo is a lot more social. There are many gametypes that are ideal with your friends and custom matches are a blast.
Call of Duty is more of an arcady sort of thing. Team Deathmatch, Control the 3 points, etc.
The only similarity is infact the 10 year-olds screaming their heads off on mics, but whoever invented the mute button deserves a raise I guess
Offline
Hmmm... Halo or CoD?
Neither, because they focus almost solely on multiplayer. Give me a half-decent single player over multiplayer anyday.
Or just Half-Life. Half-Life and Bioshock.
BEAST!
Offline
Luke121 wrote:
Hmmm... Halo or CoD?
Neither, because they focus almost solely on multiplayer. Give me a half-decent single player over multiplayer anyday.
Or just Half-Life. Half-Life and Bioshock.
BEAST!
halo ce had an awesome campaign basically designed for singleplayer
anyway, i havent seen much cod but my opinion is pretty much based around one youtube comment telling how cod n stuff are super realistic and that the author of the comment didnt want super realism in the games they play but rather a fantasy world full of new and exciting things never before seen
Offline
777w wrote:
Luke121 wrote:
Hmmm... Halo or CoD?
Neither, because they focus almost solely on multiplayer. Give me a half-decent single player over multiplayer anyday.
Or just Half-Life. Half-Life and Bioshock.
BEAST!halo ce had an awesome campaign basically designed for singleplayer
anyway, i havent seen much cod but my opinion is pretty much based around one youtube comment telling how cod n stuff are super realistic and that the author of the comment didnt want super realism in the games they play but rather a fantasy world full of new and exciting things never before seen
Fantasy shooters aren't a genre that have really been explored.
I'd personally would love to see what happens if some game company could pull it off well!
Offline
Luke121 wrote:
777w wrote:
Luke121 wrote:
Hmmm... Halo or CoD?
Neither, because they focus almost solely on multiplayer. Give me a half-decent single player over multiplayer anyday.
Or just Half-Life. Half-Life and Bioshock.
BEAST!halo ce had an awesome campaign basically designed for singleplayer
anyway, i havent seen much cod but my opinion is pretty much based around one youtube comment telling how cod n stuff are super realistic and that the author of the comment didnt want super realism in the games they play but rather a fantasy world full of new and exciting things never before seenFantasy shooters aren't a genre that have really been explored.
I'd personally would love to see what happens if some game company could pull it off well!
not fantasy, you silly man, FANTASY!
by fantasy he meant not elves n orcs n stuff but rather that which is not ordinary or realistic in most any way
Offline
777w wrote:
Luke121 wrote:
777w wrote:
halo ce had an awesome campaign basically designed for singleplayer
anyway, i havent seen much cod but my opinion is pretty much based around one youtube comment telling how cod n stuff are super realistic and that the author of the comment didnt want super realism in the games they play but rather a fantasy world full of new and exciting things never before seenFantasy shooters aren't a genre that have really been explored.
I'd personally would love to see what happens if some game company could pull it off well!not fantasy, you silly man, FANTASY!
by fantasy he meant not elves n orcs n stuff but rather that which is not ordinary or realistic in most any way
And that's not fantasy?
Offline
Luke121 wrote:
777w wrote:
Luke121 wrote:
Fantasy shooters aren't a genre that have really been explored.
I'd personally would love to see what happens if some game company could pull it off well!not fantasy, you silly man, FANTASY!
by fantasy he meant not elves n orcs n stuff but rather that which is not ordinary or realistic in most any wayAnd that's not fantasy?
it is, but you were misinterpreting my use of the word
Offline
Halo is way better than call of duty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@@@@@@@#$$$%^&*(()_
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
Neither.
Shooting games suck.
*cough*TF2*cough*
Offline
schusteralex2 wrote:
Neither. They're inventors REALLY should try using a plot
Halo has a great plot...?
Offline