This took me really long. Like 4 and a half hours:
http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2012/ … 4w2l0c.png
Thoughts?
Offline
That's waaaay too small for anyone to sleep on. Your bed is not usable as a bed.
You should fix that.
(just kidding, it's pretty cool)
Last edited by videogame9 (2012-04-12 21:31:06)
Offline
Ooh, miniatures!
How small is that bed?
Offline
You should sew little pet animal things together. (I sewed a turtle and a dolphin and I gave them to my little cousin- she loves them!) You could make like a collection of mini things
Offline
Miniatures are awesome
I've made a tiny bed (which I still have), about 5 sleds (all broken and lost over the years), and a house in a shoebox with a bunch of random tiny stuff in it, mostly handmade, some old doll furniture
Offline
Thanks guys
@cheddargirl It's actually bigger than it looks...about 9 inches long, 5 inches wide, and 2 inches tall
@schusteralex2 What?
Offline
fungirl123 wrote:
Thanks guys
@cheddargirl It's actually bigger than it looks...about 9 inches long, 5 inches wide, and 2 inches tall
@schusteralex2 What?
He wants you to take a picture of it next to something like a fruit or an everyday object so they can see how big it is compared to that, like a quarter and an apple.
Offline
Woah, I could never do that. I like the detail in the wooden part. I also like the focus of the camera.
Offline
@werdna and silvershine, thanks!
Here's the bed next to a Crayola marker:
http://oi44.tinypic.com/35b83te.jpg
So yeah, a lot bigger than it looks.
My camera has a way of making things look smaller than they really are...
Or is it just me?
Last edited by fungirl123 (2012-04-13 17:29:19)
Offline
Shinyyy
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
You should take a picture with some other objects next to it for comparison
Look up 3 posts.
Offline
Mokat wrote:
I once made a miniature sofa, but my cat stepped on it and it fell apart
Offline
werdna123 wrote:
Chrischb wrote:
You should take a picture with some other objects next to it for comparison
Look up 3 posts.
Rawrrrr am so used to scanning a page for images without checking for image links
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
Chrischb wrote:
You should take a picture with some other objects next to it for comparison
Look up 3 posts.
Rawrrrr am so used to scanning a page for images without checking for image links
I assume universal use of antidote, though that's not true, and put img tags anyway.
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
Chrischb wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
Look up 3 posts.
Rawrrrr am so used to scanning a page for images without checking for image links
I assume universal use of antidote, though that's not true, and put img tags anyway.
Images are back though
Last edited by Wickimen (2012-04-13 20:06:01)
Offline