Scratch

agscratcher wrote:

wolvesstar97 wrote:

agscratcher wrote:

I have four new updates to my previous theory:

1) I mentioned using light itself as a platform. However, light never goes in a concrete, uniform direction. So, I decided you could move across lasers.

2) I then realized that lasers would be inefficient, as they're weaker than actual light. So, I decided trying to find a method to control light to move in a concrete direction.

3) I then realized that only one thing could be powerful enough to do this: gravity. We need to create a controlled gravity field where the light would be forced to bend into a concrete direction. At first, I thought the thing we'd need to make the proper artificial gravity field would be a miniature black hole, but I though it might be too dangerous. I then decided on dark matter as the candidate. Unfortunately, we don't know what dark matter is. Boo hoo.

4) REJOICE! I looked back on my mini black hole theory and realized it had some truths to it. Remember when everyone was freaking out over the Large Hardon Collider having the potential to destroy the world by sucking it into an artificial black hole? The answer to our problem is a miniature Large (lol oxymoron) Hardon Collider.


Does this make any sense...at all?

Yep. That actually makes a lot of sense.
But you wouldnt need a mini of the LHC, the LHC makes black holes on an atomic scale.
A mini LHC would be the smallest unit possible.

But, I think dark matter would work as well, if it could be in a tangible form. 

By miniature, I mean so it could fit on an interstellar vehicle. Otherwise, you'd have a ship the size of Europe exploring the cosmos.

By the LHC makes "minature" black holes, it makes black holes slightly larger than atoms.

Now moving on to a different discussion, I figured out why black holes get bigger as they suck more in. They don't. You see, because there is less mass in the universe when a black hole absorbs it, the universe gets smaller. So in reality, they're just getting proportionally bigger.

EDIT: Because wolvesstar doesn't want to leave the previous discussion, I'll explain. I don't mean make the black hole smaller, I mean make the device smaller.

Last edited by agscratcher (2012-04-11 23:26:52)

agscratcher wrote:

Now moving on to a different discussion, I figured out why black holes get bigger as they suck more in. They don't. You see, because there is less mass in the universe when a black hole absorbs it, the universe gets smaller. So in reality, they're just getting proportionally bigger.

EDIT: Because wolvesstar doesn't want to leave the previous discussion, I'll explain. I don't mean make the black hole smaller, I mean make the device smaller.

there is not less mass. There is less volume, as the black hole gains mass. Haven't you heard of the Law of Conservation of Mass?

wolvesstar97 wrote:

agscratcher wrote:

You know what, I'm going to answer every question from everyone who has ever been involved in this discussion. How? The Ten Dimensions Theory:

http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/?v=JkxieS-6WuA

http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/?v=ySBaYMESb8o


Seriously, I think these could explain everything. Plus, the videos themselves have links to other videos relating to the subject as well. YAY SCIENCE.

That's a cool video.
I like the sound effects 

You should look at more videos by the guy. They explain so much. Why? He isn't trying to make new theories. He's trying to let the common person comprehend them.

agscratcher wrote:

Now moving on to a different discussion, I figured out why black holes get bigger as they suck more in. They don't. You see, because there is less mass in the universe when a black hole absorbs it, the universe gets smaller. So in reality, they're just getting proportionally bigger.

EDIT: Because wolvesstar doesn't want to leave the previous discussion, I'll explain. I don't mean make the black hole smaller, I mean make the device smaller.

Ohhhhh I get it now.
Carry on with your theory. It's interesting.

COMPLETE OVERHAUL of topic. Check it out!

Last edited by wolvesstar97 (2012-04-12 02:18:17)

trinary wrote:

You do know that until you have evidence, and a proof, your theories are simply theories, simply what you believe?

Yes, I do.

trinary wrote:

What is time?

The allowance of motion

What is motion?
Heat (6th grade science).

So my question is, does time allow you to be warm?

wolvesstar97 wrote:

TorbyFork234 wrote:

trinary wrote:

What is time?

The allowance of motion

What is motion?
Heat (6th grade science).

So my question is, does time allow you to be warm?

You already posted that.
But to awnser your question:

No.
Time isn't the allowance of motion, it's the passage of events.

How do those events pass? What makes them be events?
I reposted that because s/he asked.

What is dimension?

TorbyFork234 wrote:

wolvesstar97 wrote:

TorbyFork234 wrote:

How do those events pass? What makes them be events?

Time is a part of the measuring system used to sequence events, to compare the durations of events and the intervals between them, and to quantify rates of change such as the motions of objects.
Time does not allow motion, it records the duriation of a motion, which is a change.

It records the duration, yes, but time is making that duration. Without time, everything would be frozen solid. Nothing would be able to move, without the time there to give it time to move. Without time, there is no motion, so time allows motion. Proof: type your post with no time at all. It can't be done.

EDIT: NO! I DONT GIVE UP! I JUST THOUGHT OF SOMETHING!

Yes, time creates motion. However, it cannot create heat, because heat is made from energy. There is no energy in the 4th dimmension. Energy comes from the 3rd or lower dimmensions, the tangible dimmensions.

HA!

Last edited by wolvesstar97 (2012-04-12 03:30:27)

wolvesstar97 wrote:

TorbyFork234 wrote:

wolvesstar97 wrote:

Time is a part of the measuring system used to sequence events, to compare the durations of events and the intervals between them, and to quantify rates of change such as the motions of objects.
Time does not allow motion, it records the duriation of a motion, which is a change.

It records the duration, yes, but time is making that duration. Without time, everything would be frozen solid. Nothing would be able to move, without the time there to give it time to move. Without time, there is no motion, so time allows motion. Proof: type your post with no time at all. It can't be done.

EDIT: NO! I DONT GIVE UP! I JUST THOUGHT OF SOMETHING!

Yes, time creates motion. However, it cannot create heat, because heat is made from energy. There is no energy in the 4th dimmension. Energy comes from the 3rd or lower dimmensions, the tangible dimmensions.

HA!

First answer me this, what is motion?

@agscratcher
What is anti-time?

TorbyFork234 wrote:

agscratcher
What is anti-time?

A force that goes through the fourth dimension in a direction opposite of time. Since we experience duration only through time, we experience anti-time as a reversing of our history. But the fourth dimension makes sense in either direction.


BTW, I know how to freeze time. Make a field of anti-time with a force equal to the time around it.