Scratch

TorbyFork234 · 2012-04-11 20:46:42

soupoftomato wrote:
TorbyFork234 wrote:
Mokat wrote:

You might not want to time travel. It's very confusing to think about it.
Example:
If you go back in time and accidentally kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma.....
it's confuzzling.
Has anyone ever thought that maybe the world would just deal with it? (this is all offtopic) If time travel were allowed in the universe, then the universe would have to make rules to allow it to be there, therefore not creating crazy paradoxes. Maybe, it would be that you travel to an alternate universe whenever you time travel, and not your own. It could be anything, because so far there's no such thing
Back on topic...
In the Hitchhikers Guide and Harry Potter, there is a very logical assumption that when you go back in time, everything you've done has already happened, so the Universe has already dealt with you.

But what if you go back in time, and completely change something that you know of to have happened and how it happened, to occur differently and everything happened differently?

Back on topic...
I seriously think Lucario621 would be in that top 3.

coolstuff · 2012-04-11 21:10:37

I'd like to remind everyone to get back on topic, please. smile

Unite · 2012-04-11 21:18:31

TorbyFork234 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
TorbyFork234 wrote:

Has anyone ever thought that maybe the world would just deal with it? (this is all offtopic) If time travel were allowed in the universe, then the universe would have to make rules to allow it to be there, therefore not creating crazy paradoxes. Maybe, it would be that you travel to an alternate universe whenever you time travel, and not your own. It could be anything, because so far there's no such thing
Back on topic...
In the Hitchhikers Guide and Harry Potter, there is a very logical assumption that when you go back in time, everything you've done has already happened, so the Universe has already dealt with you.
But what if you go back in time, and completely change something that you know of to have happened and how it happened, to occur differently and everything happened differently?

Back on topic...
I seriously think Lucario621 would be in that top 3.

I think he will, Alot of people like him, I voted for Scimonster, then LS97, then Sparks.

schusteralex2 · 2012-04-11 21:27:15

I went Sci, Sparks, and Getty smile

Unite · 2012-04-11 21:34:13

Unite wrote:
TorbyFork234 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:

In the Hitchhikers Guide and Harry Potter, there is a very logical assumption that when you go back in time, everything you've done has already happened, so the Universe has already dealt with you.
But what if you go back in time, and completely change something that you know of to have happened and how it happened, to occur differently and everything happened differently?

Back on topic...
I seriously think Lucario621 would be in that top 3.
I think he will, Alot of people like him, I voted for Scimonster, then LS97, then Sparks.

well, I didnt do it on this account DUH roll I did it on my old account.

stevetheipad · 2012-04-11 21:36:11

I don't think I'll share my vote, but I will say that I wish everyone good luck!

wolvesstar97 · 2012-04-11 21:38:49

TorbyFork234 wrote:
Mokat wrote:
MoreGamesNow wrote:

I'm glad I'm not the only one who saw that, lol. At least now I have concrete evidence that time travel exists xD
You might not want to time travel. It's very confusing to think about it.
Example:
If you go back in time and accidentally kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma.....
it's confuzzling.
Has anyone ever thought that maybe the world would just deal with it? (this is all offtopic) If time travel were allowed in the universe, then the universe would have to make rules to allow it to be there, therefore not creating crazy paradoxes. Maybe, it would be that you travel to an alternate universe whenever you time travel, and not your own. It could be anything, because so far there's no such thing
Back on topic...

My predictions for the outcome (not what I hope, what I predict).

1.)Scimonster
2.)Sparks
3.)Lucario621

Um, time travel goes in this topic...
Great discussion, though.

pi3 · 2012-04-11 21:50:24

illusionist wrote:
I'm going to predict:

1. Sparks
2. Gettysburg
3. Lucario621

Really? I'm almost positive that scimonster will be #1, seeing all of the advertising siggies with his name on them. Even if he's not #1, he'll definitey be in the top 3.

veggieman001 · 2012-04-11 22:02:51

pi3 wrote:
illusionist wrote:
I'm going to predict:

1. Sparks
2. Gettysburg
3. Lucario621
Really? I'm almost positive that scimonster will be #1, seeing all of the advertising siggies with his name on them. Even if he's not #1, he'll definitey be in the top 3.

This.

I'm going to guess
1. Scimonster
2. Sparks
3. Lucario621

wolvesstar97 · 2012-04-11 22:04:41

pi3 wrote:
illusionist wrote:
I'm going to predict:

1. Sparks
2. Gettysburg
3. Lucario621
Really? I'm almost positive that scimonster will be #1, seeing all of the advertising siggies with his name on them. Even if he's not #1, he'll definitey be in the top 3.

Same. I dont think Gettysburg will be in the top 3, couldnt really see much of a campaign.

1. Scimonster
2. Sparks?
3. Lucario621?

The positions of sparks and lucario could be switched.

Dinoclor · 2012-04-11 22:08:05

ONE MORE HOUR TO VOTE. IF YOU HAVEN'T YET, VOTE NOW

Last edited by Dinoclor (2012-04-11 22:08:26)

scimonster · 2012-04-11 22:10:39

RedRocker227 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Lucario621 wrote:
SJRCS_011 wrote:
And I haven't seen Lucario lately.
RedRocker227 wrote:
I think Lucario would be a good mod, but I hardly ever see him anymore.
I've been looking around the forums plenty, but I think I just haven't been posting much. I certainly do post in the Suggestions, All About Scratch, and Bugs and Troubleshooting forums every once in a while though. I know what it's like to be unfamiliar with a new programming language, so I try to spend most of my efforts there. But I also try to not say something that somebody else already said, or say "I don't know" or just include one link. I also haven't been that interested in Advanced Topics too much recently, I'm not sure why. I'm not into the modding stuff to heavily, since we'll be moving to Scratch 2.0 eventually.
Exactly, that's why i don't have over 9000 posts yet. It's pointless to just repeat something already said upthread, or give an "i don't know".
Me too. I only post if I'm expanding on what another user's said, or if it hasn't been answered at all.

(You were serious about starting a revolution where nobody capitalises "I"s, weren't you? )

I was serious. Thread in MAC coming soon. tongue (That time i capitalized it because it was at the beginning of the sentence. wink )

scimonster · 2012-04-11 22:24:08

Squawkers13 wrote:
it says im a new scratcher and cant vote!

You need to have 3 projects. Quick, upload two and place your vote!
Only 25 minutes left to vote!

Ecliptic · 2012-04-11 22:26:58

scimonster wrote:
Squawkers13 wrote:
it says im a new scratcher and cant vote!
You need to have 3 projects. Quick, upload two and place your vote!
Only 25 minutes left to vote!

I don't think it's very good that you're telling someone to make two projects, which most likely would be crummy owing to the fact that there's 25 minutes left, just to vote.

scimonster · 2012-04-11 22:40:31

Ecliptic wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Squawkers13 wrote:
it says im a new scratcher and cant vote!
You need to have 3 projects. Quick, upload two and place your vote!
Only 25 minutes left to vote!
I don't think it's very good that you're telling someone to make two projects, which most likely would be crummy owing to the fact that there's 25 minutes left, just to vote.

Who knows, maybe he has two good projects waiting to be uploaded. ;P

20 minutes left! Cast your votes before it's too late!

CheeseMunchy · 2012-04-11 22:43:23

scimonster wrote:
Ecliptic wrote:
scimonster wrote:

You need to have 3 projects. Quick, upload two and place your vote!
Only 25 minutes left to vote!
I don't think it's very good that you're telling someone to make two projects, which most likely would be crummy owing to the fact that there's 25 minutes left, just to vote.
Who knows, maybe he has two good projects waiting to be uploaded. ;P

20 minutes left! Cast your votes before it's too late!

And it was 25 minutes 15 minutes ago? tongue

GeonoTRON2000 · 2012-04-11 22:44:59

16 min left!!!

scimonster · 2012-04-11 22:46:06

CheeseMunchy wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Ecliptic wrote:

I don't think it's very good that you're telling someone to make two projects, which most likely would be crummy owing to the fact that there's 25 minutes left, just to vote.
Who knows, maybe he has two good projects waiting to be uploaded. ;P

20 minutes left! Cast your votes before it's too late!
And it was 25 minutes 15 minutes ago?

Misread the clock. xD

14 minutes!

jvvg · 2012-04-11 22:47:52

13 minutes!

Do we get results as soon as it is over, or do we have to wait a while?

veggieman001 · 2012-04-11 22:48:34

jvvg wrote:
13 minutes!

Do we get results as soon as it is over, or do we have to wait a while?

I believe they're coming out tomorrow.

jvvg · 2012-04-11 22:50:14

veggieman001 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
13 minutes!

Do we get results as soon as it is over, or do we have to wait a while?
I believe they're coming out tomorrow.

Aww, man...I live in the same time zone as these elections, so I have to wait until I can access my computer tomorrow to get the results. sad

scimonster · 2012-04-11 22:59:24

1 MINUTE LEFT!!! OMG!

scimonster · 2012-04-11 23:00:45

And... time's UP!
The voting page has been (automatically I assume) taken down!

stevetheipad · 2012-04-11 23:00:50

......And voting is over. three Scratchers just got elected Community Moderators. Wow.

veggieman001 · 2012-04-11 23:01:36

stevetheipad wrote:
......And voting is over. three Scratchers just got elected Community Moderators. Wow.

If their parent/guardians allow it tongue

Scratch

archived forums

#926 2012-04-11 20:46:42

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

soupoftomato wrote:

TorbyFork234 wrote:

Mokat wrote:

#927 2012-04-11 21:10:37

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

#928 2012-04-11 21:18:31

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

TorbyFork234 wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

TorbyFork234 wrote:

#929 2012-04-11 21:27:15

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

#930 2012-04-11 21:34:13

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

Unite wrote:

TorbyFork234 wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

#931 2012-04-11 21:36:11

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

#932 2012-04-11 21:38:49

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

TorbyFork234 wrote:

Mokat wrote:

MoreGamesNow wrote:

#933 2012-04-11 21:50:24

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

illusionist wrote:

#934 2012-04-11 22:02:51

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

pi3 wrote:

illusionist wrote:

#935 2012-04-11 22:04:41

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

pi3 wrote:

illusionist wrote:

#936 2012-04-11 22:08:05

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

#937 2012-04-11 22:10:39

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

RedRocker227 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

Lucario621 wrote:

SJRCS_011 wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

#938 2012-04-11 22:24:08

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

Squawkers13 wrote:

#939 2012-04-11 22:26:58

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

scimonster wrote:

Squawkers13 wrote:

#940 2012-04-11 22:40:31

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

Ecliptic wrote:

scimonster wrote:

Squawkers13 wrote:

#941 2012-04-11 22:43:23

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

scimonster wrote:

Ecliptic wrote:

scimonster wrote:

#942 2012-04-11 22:44:59

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

#943 2012-04-11 22:46:06

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

CheeseMunchy wrote:

scimonster wrote:

Ecliptic wrote:

#944 2012-04-11 22:47:52

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

#945 2012-04-11 22:48:34

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

jvvg wrote:

#946 2012-04-11 22:50:14

Re: Spring 2012 CM Elections: Discussion

veggieman001 wrote: