Scratch

Mokat wrote:

MoreGamesNow wrote:

stevetheipad wrote:

Time travel. 

I'm glad I'm not the only one who saw that, lol.  At least now I have concrete evidence that time travel exists xD

You might not want to time travel. It's very confusing to think about it.
Example:
If you go back in time and accidentally kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma.....
it's confuzzling.

Yeah, but I'm not planning on killing my grandma. Why are you planning on killing yours? o.O

Mokat wrote:

MoreGamesNow wrote:

stevetheipad wrote:

Time travel. 

I'm glad I'm not the only one who saw that, lol.  At least now I have concrete evidence that time travel exists xD

You might not want to time travel. It's very confusing to think about it.
Example:
If you go back in time and accidentally kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma.....
it's confuzzling.

Has anyone ever thought that maybe the world would just deal with it? (this is all offtopic) If time travel were allowed in the universe, then the universe would have to make rules to allow it to be there, therefore not creating crazy paradoxes. Maybe, it would be that you travel to an alternate universe whenever you time travel, and not your own. It could be anything, because so far there's no such thing
Back on topic...

My predictions for the outcome (not what I hope, what I predict).

1.)Scimonster
2.)Sparks
3.)Lucario621

veggieman001 wrote:

Mokat wrote:

MoreGamesNow wrote:

I'm glad I'm not the only one who saw that, lol.  At least now I have concrete evidence that time travel exists xD

You might not want to time travel. It's very confusing to think about it.
Example:
If you go back in time and accidentally kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma.....
it's confuzzling.

Yeah, but I'm not planning on killing my grandma. Why are you planning on killing yours? o.O

DIdn't you notice the "Accidentally"?

TorbyFork234 wrote:

Mokat wrote:

MoreGamesNow wrote:

I'm glad I'm not the only one who saw that, lol.  At least now I have concrete evidence that time travel exists xD

You might not want to time travel. It's very confusing to think about it.
Example:
If you go back in time and accidentally kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma.....
it's confuzzling.

Has anyone ever thought that maybe the world would just deal with it? (this is all offtopic) If time travel were allowed in the universe, then the universe would have to make rules to allow it to be there, therefore not creating crazy paradoxes. Maybe, it would be that you travel to an alternate universe whenever you time travel, and not your own. It could be anything, because so far there's no such thing
Back on topic...

My predictions for the outcome (not what I hope, what I predict).

1.)Scimonster
2.)Sparks
3.)Lucario621

Yeah, but there are so many "if"s. Heck, the Titanic might not have sunk if someone had gotten the French Onion soup instead of Chicken Noodle soup for dinner!

zippynk wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

zippynk wrote:

Is it supposed to allow you to vote twice?

It doesn't, it comes up with an error message.

Does it let you view the voting form though?

Yeah, but when you click "Submit" it says you can't vote.

Wow, lots of new posts after being gone all day.

It's going to be interesting to see who wins, it seems really close right now!

wolvesstar97 wrote:

I read them, however none of my descision was based on it. Just previous posts. For example, I haven't seen Gettysburg WHATSOEVER on the forums, therefore he will not be top voted on my list, even though he has a good speech.

Anyways, speaking of Gettysburg, I havent really seen any campaign by him.

Then I guess we haven't been on at the same times much, because I am here...

Last edited by gettysburg11 (2012-04-11 19:27:49)

it says im a new scratcher and cant vote!

Mokat wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

zippynk wrote:

Does it let you view the voting form though?

Yeah, but when you click "Submit" it says you can't vote.

I clicked "Submit" but then I pressed the back button to make sure that I got them the way I wanted, then I clicked submit again and it got the error message. Did my vote go through?

Yeah, I think, things like that usually go through.

The pressure!

When Will We Find Out???????????
I Must Know :p

Why is everything on the forums in the middle? I feel it has to do with the announcement at the top of the forums 

Mokat wrote:

When Will We Find Out???????????
I Must Know :p

We should know sometime tomorrow according to this:

Lightnin wrote:

Results will be announced Thursday, April 12, after which we will begin the confirmation process with the parents of the candidates with the highest number of votes.

TorbyFork234 wrote:

Mokat wrote:

MoreGamesNow wrote:

I'm glad I'm not the only one who saw that, lol.  At least now I have concrete evidence that time travel exists xD

You might not want to time travel. It's very confusing to think about it.
Example:
If you go back in time and accidentally kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma, then you couldn't be born, but then you couldn't go back in time, but then you would be alive and you could go back in time and kill your grandma.....
it's confuzzling.

Has anyone ever thought that maybe the world would just deal with it? (this is all offtopic) If time travel were allowed in the universe, then the universe would have to make rules to allow it to be there, therefore not creating crazy paradoxes. Maybe, it would be that you travel to an alternate universe whenever you time travel, and not your own. It could be anything, because so far there's no such thing
Back on topic...

In the Hitchhikers Guide and Harry Potter, there is a very logical assumption that when you go back in time, everything you've done has already happened, so the Universe has already dealt with you.