OK, so I just noticed this. When I try to load another page, the audio bugs up and starts skipping madly. Just letting you know about that. Other then that, I haven't seen any bugs in the player
Offline
SoulAlly_Hanna wrote:
OK, so I just noticed this. When I try to load another page, the audio bugs up and starts skipping madly. Just letting you know about that. Other then that, I haven't seen any bugs in the player
That happens with most things, flash on other sites for example.
Offline
I think that neither should be removed, and there should always be an option to switch between them, like a "switch" button in the top left. Each player has its merits. For example: the flash player runs much faster while the java player will always work.
Offline
DrakeJoshF wrote:
I HATE EVERYTHING ABOUT IT! yOU NEED TO RESTART OR JUST GO BACK TO THE OLD VERSION!
I smell troll
Offline
I like it!
I've found that one of my projects works better using the flash player. Full screen is a nice touch, too.
Offline
I think it's great! No problems, and it's easier to use than the Java.
Offline
Its Cool and faster , but too many glitches in some programs like my Tetris1.68
Last edited by Doof4294967296 (2012-04-01 08:29:14)
Offline
Ummm make a horse that runs across the gr(e/a)y bar like every 10 seconds
Offline
its ok i mean it is to fast for my computer and my brain has a hard time keeping up with it so sorry to be the bear of bad news
Offline
It is slow, but it has clearer sound, pictures and animations, but, with the fullscreen, it goes all pixellated and *.
Offline
pinnipediator wrote:
It is slow, but it has clearer sound, pictures and animations, but, with the fullscreen, it goes all pixellated and *.
No, it is not slow at all. Flash is over 1000x faster than Java.
Offline
Mokat wrote:
pinnipediator wrote:
It is slow, but it has clearer sound, pictures and animations, but, with the fullscreen, it goes all pixellated and *.
It's not slow at all! It's like 10000000000000x faster than the Java player!
Flash is approximately 3333.333333333333333333333334x faster than Java.
Offline
Ok, but flash is better in most ways, so i haven't used java for a while which is probably why i didn't notice it wasn't slower
I still don't like the pixellate effect though. It's like it just zooms in, instead of bringing it to fullscreen, which involves getting back the sharpness from zooming in.
Offline
Don't worry; Scratch 2.0 will have vector graphics so the fullscreen will be a lot smoother.
Offline
I noticed the flah player can run tons of forever scripts, but javascript and normal do not. There should be some type of way you can use flash when a project is downloaded, not just when its on the website.
But anyways, the flash player is really good!
Offline
LEGOengineer261 wrote:
There should be some type of way you can use flash when a project is downloaded, not just when its on the website.
That, my friend, is a brilliant idea! There should be a downloaded flash. Although Scratch 2.0 will be online anyway...
Offline
FLASH is a thousand times better _meow_
when gf clicked say [it's all about flash!] for (2)
Offline
when gf clicked say [It's all about flash] for (3) secs pen down
Offline
DoubleDoubleJ wrote:
when gf clicked say [It's all about flash] for (3) secs pen down
There's an edit button in the bottom right of your posts.
Don't post a second post correcting the first, edit the first.
Last edited by Splodgey (2012-04-04 03:15:48)
Offline
Yeah, use flash not on the website, download as a swf file, or something like that, .sb is rubbish, clunky and pointless.
Offline
pinnipediator wrote:
Yeah, use flash not on the website, download as a swf file, or something like that, .sb is rubbish, clunky and pointless.
First of all you can't download it as a .swf file, only a .sb, and if you think .sbs are rubbish, why do you use Scratch?
Offline
I like it cuz it works. Plus, my music is much clearer.
Offline