I just realized a few days ago that the Scratch forums don't have the strike through tag!
It's just simple strike through using [s] and [/s] tags. And it would be easy to implement.
Last edited by stevetheipad (2012-03-24 11:51:24)
Offline
It's so easy to do. Way easier than ScratchBlocks.
Just do it already, ST!
Offline
scimonster wrote:
It's so easy to do. Way easier than ScratchBlocks.
Just do it already, ST!
I know! I'm sure JSO could do it in five minutes or less.
Offline
stevetheipad wrote:
scimonster wrote:
It's so easy to do. Way easier than ScratchBlocks.
Just do it already, ST!I know! I'm sure JSO could do it in five minutes or less.
If I could do their FTP I could do it in less than 1 and a half.
Offline
Smartys did it in around one minute, so it can't be too hard.
I support.
Offline
It might be nice. (course there are a million other BBCode tags I wish I had)
Offline
Well, it does seem like it would be easy to do. But what good is it really? Why strike things out, when you can just replace them?
Beyond that, we really don't want to be spending more time working on the old forum software (other than security fixes) when we could be spending those same hours working on the new software.
Offline
Paddle2See wrote:
Well, it does seem like it would be easy to do. But what good is it really? Why strike things out, when you can just replace them?
Beyond that, we really don't want to be spending more time working on the old forum software (other than security fixes) when we could be spending those same hours working on the new software.
You do have a point. Does that mean implementing these spare BB-Codes as part of 2.0?
Offline
Paddle2See wrote:
Well, it does seem like it would be easy to do. But what good is it really? Why strike things out, when you can just replace them?
Beyond that, we really don't want to be spending more time working on the old forum software (other than security fixes) when we could be spending those same hours working on the new software.
It's a rarly useful but it can be very useful sometimes. For example, if you edited a post and the information became old, yet you wanted to display it, you could use the tags and then write the new info below.
And I can easily see that you wouldn't want to waste time with this, but if it only takes three minutes, why not?
Offline
I support.
It wouldn't take very long.
Offline
stevetheipad wrote:
Paddle2See wrote:
Well, it does seem like it would be easy to do. But what good is it really? Why strike things out, when you can just replace them?
Beyond that, we really don't want to be spending more time working on the old forum software (other than security fixes) when we could be spending those same hours working on the new software.It's a rarly useful but it can be very useful sometimes. For example, if you edited a post and the information became old, yet you wanted to display it, you could use the tags and then write the new info below.
And I can easily see that you wouldn't want to waste time with this, but if it only takes three minutes, why not?
Yeah, really. It's [s]2[/s] 1 minutes, not even 3.
Offline