Scratch

Mokat · 2012-03-22 19:13:04

B
U
M
P

turkey3 · 2012-03-22 19:17:10

Support all the way!

TorbyFork234 · 2012-03-22 19:27:22

Support!

Luke121 · 2012-03-22 19:27:41

Support ALL the thongs!

Greenatic · 2012-03-22 20:48:14

Thanks to turkey3, TorbyFork234, and Luke121! smile smile smile

coolhogs · 2012-03-22 22:03:54

You should group the names...

Mokat · 2012-03-23 08:45:42

coolhogs wrote:
You should group the names...

That might be kinda tricky,......

Greenatic · 2012-03-23 14:21:27

coolhogs wrote:
You should group the names...

How do you suggest I group them?

coolhogs · 2012-03-23 14:41:29

Greenatic wrote:
coolhogs wrote:
You should group the names...
How do you suggest I group them?

Alphabetically... Well, numbers first and then letters...

Last edited by coolhogs (2012-03-23 14:46:09)

Greenatic · 2012-03-23 16:30:00

coolhogs wrote:
Greenatic wrote:
coolhogs wrote:
You should group the names...
How do you suggest I group them?
Alphabetically... Well, numbers first and then letters...

I don't see how that would be particularly useful... hmm

coolhogs · 2012-03-23 16:35:08

Greenatic wrote:
coolhogs wrote:
Greenatic wrote:

How do you suggest I group them?
Alphabetically... Well, numbers first and then letters...
I don't see how that would be particularly useful...

You can see if you supported or not...

coolhogs · 2012-03-23 16:42:43

coolhogs wrote:
Greenatic wrote:
coolhogs wrote:

Alphabetically... Well, numbers first and then letters...
I don't see how that would be particularly useful...
You can see if you supported or not...

Also, Can you tell me if I supported. I can't find me. If I didn't support, please put me on the list, because I support...

Greenatic · 2012-03-23 16:44:41

coolhogs wrote:
coolhogs wrote:
Greenatic wrote:

I don't see how that would be particularly useful...
You can see if you supported or not...
Also, Can you tell me if I supported. I can't find me. If I didn't support, please put me on the list, because I support...

Just do Ctrl+F to find your name. And no, I don't see you on the list, so I'll be happy to add you. smile

Mokat · 2012-03-24 08:16:20

Haha this page has so many supporters that it took nearly 5 minutes to load on my laptop tongue

Greenatic · 2012-03-24 08:46:26

Mokat wrote:
Haha this page has so many supporters that it took nearly 5 minutes to load on my laptop

Yep, 74 to be exact! big_smile

joletole · 2012-03-24 08:50:50

But what about the announcements page. Some topics on there are important and new scratchers should reply to that topic.

Greenatic · 2012-03-24 09:03:44

joletole wrote:
But what about the announcements page. Some topics on there are important and new scratchers should reply to that topic.

Well, that is true. I think we need to focus on the original idea though, then iron out the details once the ST annouces they're considering it.

Mokat · 2012-03-24 09:26:12

Greenatic wrote:
Mokat wrote:
Haha this page has so many supporters that it took nearly 5 minutes to load on my laptop
Yep, 74 to be exact!

yikes

logiblocs · 2012-04-03 22:34:31

Support

Greenatic · 2012-04-05 16:57:47

logiblocs wrote:
Support

Thanks! smile

Greenatic · 2012-04-13 09:35:06

bump

Greenatic · 2012-04-16 10:20:31

bump

MartinWollenweber · 2012-04-16 14:01:38

Since we have so many brave supporters:
I don't support!

Reason: Shouldn't we forbid to repeat old stupid ideas like "humans will learn how to fly"..."the earth is not a sphere"..."mankind will fly to moon", after many generation of people found out that this all is just impossible? Yes, we could save time and still live in a cave...but, should you prevent people to use old ideas mixed up with new ones to make it possible nowadays?

Yes...I wrote what you call a "necroposts" (Wikipedia and Scratch= dead since five years)... and I'm not a "young Scratcher" neither in age (born 1968) nor in Scratching (since 2007) wink

Seriously...I support the general idea, that people that never read before writing should not steal others time ... but in case of so called "necroposts" there are some exceptions...

Last edited by MartinWollenweber (2012-04-16 14:03:34)

Greenatic · 2012-04-16 17:15:35

MartinWollenweber wrote:
Since we have so many brave supporters:
I don't support!

Reason: Shouldn't we forbid to repeat old stupid ideas like "humans will learn how to fly"..."the earth is not a sphere"..."mankind will fly to moon", after many generation of people found out that this all is just impossible? Yes, we could save time and still live in a cave...but, should you prevent people to use old ideas mixed up with new ones to make it possible nowadays?

Yes...I wrote what you call a "necroposts" (Wikipedia and Scratch= dead since five years)... and I'm not a "young Scratcher" neither in age (born 1968) nor in Scratching (since 2007)

Seriously...I support the general idea, that people that never read before writing should not steal others time ... but in case of so called "necroposts" there are some exceptions...

This rule would only apply to New Scratchers, who usually have less than 100 posts (often less than 50) and have been active for less than a month. I respect your experience, and you understand that necroposting can be a bother for others, but if it's done properly, necroposting is perfectly fine...but someone with 10 posts and a day's experience doesn't understand that. That is why this rule would place a temporary restriction on new users so, as they become more experienced, we know we can trust them to use the forums properly. A similar example is how the use of [url] tags is restricted for New Scratchers.

Last edited by Greenatic (2012-04-16 17:16:21)

sparks · 2012-04-16 19:23:29

Support, this sounds reasonable!

Scratch

archived forums

#201 2012-03-22 19:13:04

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#202 2012-03-22 19:17:10

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#203 2012-03-22 19:27:22

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#204 2012-03-22 19:27:41

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#205 2012-03-22 20:48:14

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#206 2012-03-22 22:03:54

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#207 2012-03-23 08:45:42

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

coolhogs wrote:

#208 2012-03-23 14:21:27

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

coolhogs wrote:

#209 2012-03-23 14:41:29

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

Greenatic wrote:

coolhogs wrote:

#210 2012-03-23 16:30:00

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

coolhogs wrote:

Greenatic wrote:

coolhogs wrote:

#211 2012-03-23 16:35:08

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

Greenatic wrote:

coolhogs wrote:

Greenatic wrote:

#212 2012-03-23 16:42:43

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

coolhogs wrote:

Greenatic wrote:

coolhogs wrote:

#213 2012-03-23 16:44:41

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

coolhogs wrote:

coolhogs wrote:

Greenatic wrote:

#214 2012-03-24 08:16:20

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#215 2012-03-24 08:46:26

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

Mokat wrote:

#216 2012-03-24 08:50:50

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#217 2012-03-24 09:03:44

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

joletole wrote:

#218 2012-03-24 09:26:12

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

Greenatic wrote:

Mokat wrote:

#219 2012-04-03 22:34:31

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#220 2012-04-05 16:57:47

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

logiblocs wrote:

#221 2012-04-13 09:35:06

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#222 2012-04-16 10:20:31

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#223 2012-04-16 14:01:38

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

#224 2012-04-16 17:15:35

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

MartinWollenweber wrote:

#225 2012-04-16 19:23:29

Re: New Scratchers Necropost Restriction

Board footer