Scratch

werdna123 wrote:

samtwheels wrote:

It's weird how 1.2 keeps getting patched. I wish they would just fix it in prereleases.

The first 3 updates came like straight after and why wait for 1.3 to add this stuff?

because i prefer actual progress to bug fixes and decoration blocks. Hieroglyphics were meant to be added in 1.3 anyway.

werdna123 wrote:

samtwheels wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

The first 3 updates came like straight after and why wait for 1.3 to add this stuff?

because i prefer actual progress to bug fixes and decoration blocks. Hieroglyphics were meant to be added in 1.3 anyway.

Why aren't bug fixes and deco. blocks progress?

I wish they would get started with things that are actually new.

Wow, I just realized how much I've been missing out on from shaft mining. I went cavern mining and got so much iron, fast. I also found a ravine and the caverns are like a maze.

Last edited by samtwheels (2012-03-22 14:40:01)

samtwheels wrote:

WindowsExplorer wrote:

samtwheels wrote:

I wish they would get started with things that are actually new.

I saw an interview with Jeb. He said he they had been planning features like Ocelots for a long time. So big updates like that don't come quickly.

They probably have plenty planned that they have been planning for a long time, just not revealed. Maybe my pigmen minions will finally rise!

Do you watch The Yogscast?

werdna123 wrote:

samtwheels wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

Why aren't bug fixes and deco. blocks progress?

I wish they would get started with things that are actually new.

But if they do that then they'll just forget about annoying and frustrating bugs which will make minecraft a pain to play.

Right

werdna123 wrote:

samtwheels wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

Why aren't bug fixes and deco. blocks progress?

I wish they would get started with things that are actually new.

But if they do that then they'll just forget about annoying and frustrating bugs which will make minecraft a pain to play.

Minor, minor, minor bugs. I have never noticed anything annoying.

werdna123 wrote:

But think about it, a year or so ago there were lots of bugs and it was quite frustrating, and if they hadn't worked on each tiny bug it wouldn't have got better.

I didn't play a year ago, but that was beta. there's a reason they call it that.

samtwheels wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

But think about it, a year or so ago there were lots of bugs and it was quite frustrating, and if they hadn't worked on each tiny bug it wouldn't have got better.

I didn't play a year ago, but that was beta. there's a reason they call it that.

Exactly. This is the full version, so it should be all bug free.

But it's not. And to get more players they need to fix these bugs.

This argument is going nowhere, so I'm just going to step out.

WindowsExplorer wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

WindowsExplorer wrote:

Gee, everybody likes bug squashes.

If you'd been watching only one person has said they like them and one another said they don't.

Gee, whats wrong with big squashes? Want bugs from InDev to exist in version 1.8.3?

I quit the argument. No comment.

werdna123 wrote:

WindowsExplorer wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

If you'd been watching only one person has said they like them and one another said they don't.

Gee, whats wrong with big squashes? Want bugs from InDev to exist in version 1.8.3?

Gee, I'm the one who likes bug fixes...

uh, I personally think anything to improve the game is good so why does it matter if it's a bug fix or something more prominent? ;_;

werdna123 wrote:

WindowsExplorer wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

If you'd been watching only one person has said they like them and one another said they don't.

Gee, whats wrong with big squashes? Want bugs from InDev to exist in version 1.8.3?

Gee, I'm the one who likes bug fixes...

Heyy, sorry for the off-topic post, but nice signature! 

Anybody else entering the forum contest? If I get a code, I'm not sure whether I'll give it away or make an alt.