rubiks_cube_guy238 wrote:
I have a suggestion: For every <INSERT NUMBER HERE> posts, a user's signature limit goes up by <INSERT NUMBER HERE> pixels, with a maximum of <INSERT NUMBER HERE> pixels.
Interesting idea! But, I fear it will encourage spamming...
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
spamming
That's why we have the 60 second rule.
Offline
rubiks_cube_guy238 wrote:
coolstuff wrote:
spamming
That's why we have the 60 second rule.
Even so, people can still post irrelevant, unnecessary, and generally useless posts to up their post count, whereas the "optimal" forum would have every post with a nice, clear purpose.
Offline
I have an idea.
Let's have the Helpful Scratcher rank avail-ible, which they can have larger signatures?
Offline
Large signatures are a problem, especially with people with slow internet connections/people with mobile devices. In those cases, overlarge signatures are more annoyance than amusement, and can distract from the actual posts.
Perhaps there should be a an option to cut off signatures over [number] pixels, where frustrated Scratchers could specify a number of their choosing between 0 and 200.
If possible, I think there should also be an option to disable image-signatures and only show text signatures, a particularly useful option for mobile device users.
Offline
trinary wrote:
Large signatures are a problem, especially with people with slow internet connections/people with mobile devices. In those cases, overlarge signatures are more annoyance than amusement, and can distract from the actual posts.
Perhaps there should be a an option to cut off signatures over [number] pixels, where frustrated Scratchers could specify a number of their choosing between 0 and 200.
If possible, I think there should also be an option to disable image-signatures and only show text signatures, a particularly useful option for mobile device users.
Just go to Profile > Display and uncheck "Show images in user signatures"
Offline
meew0 wrote:
You could just make a scrollbar at the border. Some forum did that but I forgot the name ._.
Incredibots Forums did that.
Offline
mortrop wrote:
how come i cant make a thread?
Only admins and mods can make threads in this forum. Which makes sense if you think about it, since this forum is for announcements, and they're always the first to find out any news.
Offline
In case anyone is curious about how they enabled this or how they can accomplish this via their own forum, simply edit the CSS and add "div.postsignature{max-height:50px;}" anywhere, replacing the 50 with the number of pixels you want to be allowed. This is the same as how these forums do it, so it cuts off images and text.
Offline
The 400 characters/2 lines annoys me. I have to tinyurl all my links just to make it fit the 400 char limit and i want the chess.com bit to start on a new line to the don't click bit but i cant because of the 2 line limit.
Offline
joefarebrother wrote:
The 400 characters/2 lines annoys me. I have to tinyurl all my links just to make it fit the 400 char limit and i want the chess.com bit to start on a new line to the don't click bit but i cant because of the 2 line limit.
Yeah. I can handle the 150 pixel limit, the 400 character is ANNOYING.
Offline
Steeos wrote:
Signature??
I can not find it where
Unfortunately, New Scratchers may not have signatures.
Once you become a Scratcher, however, you will be able to set one by clicking on Profile > Personality > entering text or links and pressing 'Submit'.
Offline
Magnie wrote:
I think we should just take out images ( I set it so images now just look like <image> ). I think all people need to do is just have one line and one link ( to a project or something ). It makes the signatures look more cleaner in my opinion.
>:-( no. But you should have post scrollbars, though!
P.S. see my full emotions here: http://geonotron.net84.net/forums/viewt … 1&t=22
Last edited by GeonoTRON2000 (2012-05-12 23:52:53)
Offline
Scrollbar vote here.
Offline
I am personally shocked by the amount of people who did not set the size of their signature to 150 pixels when that was a clearly stated rule.
Offline
shamrocker wrote:
Scrollbar vote here.
I made a UserScript that does that at a limit of 250 pixels (for posts):
var posts = document.getElementsByClassName("postmsg"); var i; for (i = 0; i < posts.length; i++) { var post = posts[i]; if (post.offsetHeight > 250) { post.style.height = "250px"; post.style.wordWrap = "break-word"; post.style.overflowY = "scroll"; } }
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
trinary wrote:
Large signatures are a problem, especially with people with slow internet connections/people with mobile devices. In those cases, overlarge signatures are more annoyance than amusement, and can distract from the actual posts.
Perhaps there should be a an option to cut off signatures over [number] pixels, where frustrated Scratchers could specify a number of their choosing between 0 and 200.
If possible, I think there should also be an option to disable image-signatures and only show text signatures, a particularly useful option for mobile device users.Just go to Profile > Display and uncheck "Show images in user signatures"
Thank you.
Offline
wolvesstar97 wrote:
joefarebrother wrote:
The 400 characters/2 lines annoys me. I have to tinyurl all my links just to make it fit the 400 char limit and i want the chess.com bit to start on a new line to the don't click bit but i cant because of the 2 line limit.
Yeah. I can handle the 150 pixel limit, the 400 character is ANNOYING.
IKR! If I want to have different SMALL images, I have to tinyurl them so that it fits!
If we have a 150 pix. rule I don't think we really need the 400 char. rule
Offline
Hey guys, I think that 120x500 is a good size, because there's still enough room at the bottom for one line of text. See my signature!
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
rubiks_cube_guy238 wrote:
coolstuff wrote:
spamming
That's why we have the 60 second rule.
Even so, people can still post irrelevant, unnecessary, and generally useless posts to up their post count, whereas the "optimal" forum would have every post with a nice, clear purpose.
Offline
Mokat_Test wrote:
coolstuff wrote:
rubiks_cube_guy238 wrote:
That's why we have the 60 second rule.Even so, people can still post irrelevant, unnecessary, and generally useless posts to up their post count, whereas the "optimal" forum would have every post with a nice, clear purpose.
Like that ^.^
Offline