I think once you get over 2000 posts, you should have the ranking of 2000+. Same with 3000, 4000, etc.
Offline
trinary wrote:
That sort of defeats the whole purpose of the new postcount system...
Not really
Offline
Haiming wrote:
trinary wrote:
That sort of defeats the whole purpose of the new postcount system...
Not really
![]()
Lightnin wrote:
We've changed the way post counts are shown on the forums.
If you have less than 100 posts, your actual post count will be shown.
If you have >1000 posts, your post count will be "1000+"
If you have >500 posts, your post count will be "500+"
If you have >100 posts, your post count will be "100+"
We did this to discourage the practice of spamming topics just to up one's post count. We considered hiding post count entirely, but decided it's nice to be able to get a general sense of how much someone has posted on the forums - so we went with the tiered approach.
Scratch On!
If we took your suggestion, the spamming would just start up again as Scratchers would want to gain enough posts to achieve that 2000+ or 3000+ mark.
Offline
I support.
Offline
I think there should be 2500+, 5000+, and then 10,000+.
Offline