Scratch

Hardmath123 · 2011-12-01 09:11:49

I think it is caused by open-ended [block] tags, but I'm not sure.

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2011-12-01 09:13:10)

TRocket · 2011-12-01 14:19:47

it doesn't let you do open ended block tags
but it certainly is weird!

Hardmath123 · 2011-12-02 05:59:32

Trying to replicate:
EDIT: Yep! Got it. Blocks withput the [block] tag are considered 'open-ended' and any text after, including signatures, Edit note, and 'Offline'/'Online' are emphasized. Furthermore, some extra lines are added. This is unaffacted by any future posts.
Here's proof:

<move( )steps>

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2011-12-02 06:03:10)

Hardmath123 · 2011-12-02 06:02:13

Now testing if it goes away after another post.
<move( )steps>

Hardmath123 · 2011-12-06 04:48:43

Bump; reporting.

Paddle2See · 2011-12-06 08:25:06

Hardmath123 wrote:
Bump; reporting.

Thanks for checking this out...it's been a bug for a long time. The whole block section really needs a good house-cleaning, what with all the missing and outdated blocks.

scimonster · 2011-12-06 08:59:50

Paddle2See wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
Bump; reporting.
Thanks for checking this out...it's been a bug for a long time. The whole block section really needs a good house-cleaning, what with all the missing and outdated blocks.

+100 tongue

I knew about this.

scimonster · 2012-02-15 08:54:24

Now that we have the [scratchblocks] tag, you should completely remove the old ones. The syntax is still readable for someone viewing olde posts. In include/parser.php, reset the $smiley_text and $smiley_img arrays to the smilies. Also, it looks like the blocks were causing problems anyways, as there are three sections in that file to deal with problems from Scratch blocks.
Also, why is code for JSO's block commented out (current lines 455 & 465)? hmm

Oh yeah, it's cool to be looking at the post source and seeing how it'll be parsed. XD

Last edited by scimonster (2012-02-15 08:56:27)

Mokat · 2012-02-15 17:26:46

You should probably report for this to be closed, since we have the [scratchblocks] tags.

ProgramCAT · 2012-02-15 22:25:58

Mokat wrote:
You should probably report for this to be closed, since we have the [scratchblocks] tags.

Hardmath123 · 2012-02-16 07:30:20

'k, reporting...

But wait—the glitch is still there:
<<

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2012-02-16 07:30:31)

Mokat · 2012-02-16 08:55:32

Hardmath123 wrote:
'k, reporting...

But wait—the glitch is still there:
<<

wait, testing: >> What? Okay, nevermind reporting for this to be closed. it still happens!

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2011-12-01 09:11:49

BBCode error (!)

#2 2011-12-01 14:19:47

Re: BBCode error (!)

#3 2011-12-02 05:59:32

Re: BBCode error (!)

#4 2011-12-02 06:02:13

Re: BBCode error (!)

#5 2011-12-06 04:48:43

Re: BBCode error (!)

#6 2011-12-06 08:25:06

Re: BBCode error (!)

Hardmath123 wrote:

#7 2011-12-06 08:59:50

Re: BBCode error (!)

Paddle2See wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

#8 2012-02-15 08:54:24

Re: BBCode error (!)

#9 2012-02-15 17:26:46

Re: BBCode error (!)

#10 2012-02-15 22:25:58

Re: BBCode error (!)

Mokat wrote:

#11 2012-02-16 07:30:20

Re: BBCode error (!)

#12 2012-02-16 08:55:32

Re: BBCode error (!)

Hardmath123 wrote:

Board footer