Scratch

wolvesstar97 · 2012-02-13 23:27:37

I love GIMP, it really is better than Photoshop (haters need not comment)

jji7skyline · 2012-02-13 23:34:12

wolvesstar97 wrote:
I love GIMP, it really is better than Photoshop (haters need not comment)

+

Code:

∞

bbbeb · 2012-02-13 23:36:22

wolvesstar97 wrote:
I love GIMP, it really is better than Photoshop (haters need not comment)

Reasons?
(other than the lack of $600 to spend)

jji7skyline · 2012-02-13 23:43:16

bbbeb wrote:
wolvesstar97 wrote:
I love GIMP, it really is better than Photoshop (haters need not comment)
Reasons?
(other than the lack of $600 to spend)

*everything*

Freakish · 2012-02-13 23:55:08

Agentpieface wrote:
slinger wrote:
Agentpieface wrote:

not this again
What jj knows what he is talking about. I doubt you have even tried it :p
I've got both and Photoshop is way better

smart lad

wolvesstar97 wrote:
I love GIMP, it really is better than Photoshop (haters need not comment)

actually, it's not
it's a really cheap version of photoshop which has very little features compared to photoshop. all professional graphic designers and web designers use photoshop.

ProgramCAT · 2012-02-13 23:57:19

GIMP is a LOT easier to use than Photoshop.

Freakish · 2012-02-14 00:11:50

ProgramCAT wrote:
GIMP is a LOT easier to use than Photoshop.

no duh
it's the simplistic form of photoshop

kayybee · 2012-02-14 00:25:33

Freakish wrote:
Agentpieface wrote:
slinger wrote:

What jj knows what he is talking about. I doubt you have even tried it :p
I've got both and Photoshop is way better
smart lad

wolvesstar97 wrote:
I love GIMP, it really is better than Photoshop (haters need not comment)
actually, it's not
it's a really cheap version of photoshop which has very little features compared to photoshop. all professional graphic designers and web designers use photoshop.

tongue "haters need not comment"
hater: *comment* tongue

I tried to use gimp. I gave up. Maybe I should read a tutorial...

ProgramCAT · 2012-02-14 00:56:28

Freakish wrote:
ProgramCAT wrote:
GIMP is a LOT easier to use than Photoshop.
no duh
it's the simplistic form of photoshop

It is compact, intuitive and has a very fast workstream.

MyRedNeptune · 2012-02-14 04:24:21

Comparing GIMP to Photoshop is like comparing a small brush to a big brush.

A small brush is definitely convenient if you are making a drawing on a piece of A4 paper, as it can bring out the detail a lot easier than a big brush, but will it work for an artist who wants to paint a giant oil composition on canvas, like all of the old classical artists used to do? Not really, for that you would probably want to use a big brush.

I doubt anybody on Scratch has ever created anything of such scale that it would require Photoshop's truly advanced features.

That said, I really wanted to strangl-- errr throw tomatoes at everyone who posted in this topic, but I restrained myself and decided to post a polite post instead. Cheers! ^_^

slinger · 2012-02-14 05:06:27

Actually gimp is more like a medium brush...

fanofcena · 2012-02-14 13:28:26

slinger wrote:
Actually gimp is more like a medium brush...

I doubt .. seriously I doubt because GIMP is about 1/100 size of photoshop in both functionality and features . i myself use both and trust me from what i have seen

Gimp is like a BB GUN [ easy to use and u can use it anywhere .. also can modify it]

Photoshop is like a 110mm howitzer [ Humougous hard to edit/modify but high impact garunteed]

smile

well in typical fanofcena style

" GIMP is to PHOTOSHOP is same as Scratch is to C++ " (that comparision suits a bit too much correct )

Last edited by fanofcena (2012-02-14 13:38:52)

fungirl123 · 2012-02-14 15:14:56

Wow, those are really good analogies tongue
Anyway, GIMP is great and much easier to use than Photoshop.
BUT there are just some things GIMP cannot do, and Photoshop can.
(In my opinion)

And sorry for continuing the sort of off-topic conversation here (Even though it's relatively on topic)
Let's get back to discussing lilacfuzz's creations smile

luiysia · 2012-02-14 18:02:00

slinger wrote:
Gimp rocks.

It's best to capitalize it because gimp is a bad word for disabled people (in other words, only disabled people can use it).

slinger · 2012-02-15 01:15:29

Look people, I don't want to argue anymore. Most of you underrate Gimp but whatever...
We are totally off topic anyway. Someone want to create a Gimp VS. Photoshop thread? :p

jji7skyline · 2012-02-15 02:54:22

fanofcena wrote:
slinger wrote:
Actually gimp is more like a medium brush...
I doubt .. seriously I doubt because GIMP is about 1/100 size of photoshop in both functionality and features . i myself use both and trust me from what i have seen

Gimp is like a BB GUN [ easy to use and u can use it anywhere .. also can modify it]

Photoshop is like a 110mm howitzer [ Humougous hard to edit/modify but high impact garunteed]

well in typical fanofcena style

" GIMP is to PHOTOSHOP is same as Scratch is to C++ " (that comparision suits a bit too much correct )

Fanofcena, fanofcena, fanofcena. Always supporting the big companies aren't you.

Tell me at least 5 things that PS can do that Gimp can't do, and maybe I'll consider it worth the 500 bucks.

MyRedNeptune wrote:
Comparing GIMP to Photoshop is like comparing a small brush to a big brush.

A small brush is definitely convenient if you are making a drawing on a piece of A4 paper, as it can bring out the detail a lot easier than a big brush, but will it work for an artist who wants to paint a giant oil composition on canvas, like all of the old classical artists used to do? Not really, for that you would probably want to use a big brush.

I doubt anybody on Scratch has ever created anything of such scale that it would require Photoshop's truly advanced features.

That said, I really wanted to strangl-- errr throw tomatoes at everyone who posted in this topic, but I restrained myself and decided to post a polite post instead. Cheers! ^_^

So basically, you're saying, politely, that PS is better than Gimp. I used to like you...

Last edited by jji7skyline (2012-02-15 02:55:35)

TRocket · 2012-02-15 03:04:50

jji7skyline wrote:
fanofcena wrote:
slinger wrote:
Actually gimp is more like a medium brush...
I doubt .. seriously I doubt because GIMP is about 1/100 size of photoshop in both functionality and features . i myself use both and trust me from what i have seen

Gimp is like a BB GUN [ easy to use and u can use it anywhere .. also can modify it]

Photoshop is like a 110mm howitzer [ Humougous hard to edit/modify but high impact garunteed]

well in typical fanofcena style

" GIMP is to PHOTOSHOP is same as Scratch is to C++ " (that comparision suits a bit too much correct )
Fanofcena, fanofcena, fanofcena. Always supporting the big companies aren't you.

Tell me at least 5 things that PS can do that Gimp can't do, and maybe I'll consider it worth the 500 bucks.

MyRedNeptune wrote:
Comparing GIMP to Photoshop is like comparing a small brush to a big brush.

A small brush is definitely convenient if you are making a drawing on a piece of A4 paper, as it can bring out the detail a lot easier than a big brush, but will it work for an artist who wants to paint a giant oil composition on canvas, like all of the old classical artists used to do? Not really, for that you would probably want to use a big brush.

I doubt anybody on Scratch has ever created anything of such scale that it would require Photoshop's truly advanced features.

That said, I really wanted to strangl-- errr throw tomatoes at everyone who posted in this topic, but I restrained myself and decided to post a polite post instead. Cheers! ^_^
So basically, you're saying, politely, that PS is better than Gimp. I used to like you...

photoshop doesn't run on linux without WINE.
GIMP does.

Agentpieface · 2012-02-15 03:21:14

jji7 look up gimp vs photoshop on google and see the reasons bro

slinger · 2012-02-15 03:21:25

TRocket wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
fanofcena wrote:

I doubt .. seriously I doubt because GIMP is about 1/100 size of photoshop in both functionality and features . i myself use both and trust me from what i have seen

Gimp is like a BB GUN [ easy to use and u can use it anywhere .. also can modify it]

Photoshop is like a 110mm howitzer [ Humougous hard to edit/modify but high impact garunteed]

well in typical fanofcena style

" GIMP is to PHOTOSHOP is same as Scratch is to C++ " (that comparision suits a bit too much correct )
Fanofcena, fanofcena, fanofcena. Always supporting the big companies aren't you.

Tell me at least 5 things that PS can do that Gimp can't do, and maybe I'll consider it worth the 500 bucks.

MyRedNeptune wrote:
Comparing GIMP to Photoshop is like comparing a small brush to a big brush.

A small brush is definitely convenient if you are making a drawing on a piece of A4 paper, as it can bring out the detail a lot easier than a big brush, but will it work for an artist who wants to paint a giant oil composition on canvas, like all of the old classical artists used to do? Not really, for that you would probably want to use a big brush.

I doubt anybody on Scratch has ever created anything of such scale that it would require Photoshop's truly advanced features.

That said, I really wanted to strangl-- errr throw tomatoes at everyone who posted in this topic, but I restrained myself and decided to post a polite post instead. Cheers! ^_^
So basically, you're saying, politely, that PS is better than Gimp. I used to like you...
photoshop doesn't run on linux without WINE.
GIMP does.

Yes, anther reason to get gimp :3

Agentpieface · 2012-02-15 03:37:14

Pfft. Linux

ProgramCAT · 2012-02-15 03:46:58

Agentpieface wrote:
Pfft. Linux

What's wrong with OPENSOURCE ?

slinger · 2012-02-15 03:48:59

Agentpieface wrote:
Pfft. Linux

Oh, I've hear this lame excuse before. You're saying that because you think Linux is not a real OS or it doesn't come pre-installed, sorry bro it can http://linuxpreloaded.com/
Linux has succeeded where windows and mac have't in many ways...
Also linux is opensource tongue
Therefore your argument is invalid.

Last edited by slinger (2012-02-15 03:49:19)

TRocket · 2012-02-15 03:53:05

slinger wrote:
Agentpieface wrote:
Pfft. Linux
Oh, I've hear this lame excuse before. You're saying that because you think Linux is not a real OS or it doesn't come pre-installed, sorry bro it can http://linuxpreloaded.com/
Linux has succeeded where windows and mac have't in many ways...
Also linux is opensource
Therefore your argument is invalid.

MyRedNeptune · 2012-02-15 08:00:50

jji7skyline wrote:
So basically, you're saying, politely, that PS is better than Gimp. I used to like you...

Not at all! ^^ I actually stated in my analogy that GIMP (the "small brush") is good for "drawing on A4 paper", aka is better for personal use because it is more lightweight, has all of the features an average user would need and lacks the features that an average user would not need.

The point of my post was to disagree with the people in this topic who stated that GIMP is better and has more features than Photoshop.

Neither is better, it's just that Photoshop is accustomed for professional use. :3

Back on topic: I really like the first image. I'm always really into drawn stuff. xD

ProgrammingFreak · 2012-02-15 08:01:49

My friend enjoys Illustrator better cause it uses vectors. :3

Scratch

archived forums

#26 2012-02-13 23:27:37

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

#27 2012-02-13 23:34:12

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

wolvesstar97 wrote:

Code:

#28 2012-02-13 23:36:22

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

wolvesstar97 wrote:

#29 2012-02-13 23:43:16

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

bbbeb wrote:

wolvesstar97 wrote:

#30 2012-02-13 23:55:08

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

Agentpieface wrote:

slinger wrote:

Agentpieface wrote:

wolvesstar97 wrote:

#31 2012-02-13 23:57:19

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

#32 2012-02-14 00:11:50

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

ProgramCAT wrote:

#33 2012-02-14 00:25:33

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

Freakish wrote:

Agentpieface wrote:

slinger wrote:

wolvesstar97 wrote:

#34 2012-02-14 00:56:28

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

Freakish wrote:

ProgramCAT wrote:

#35 2012-02-14 04:24:21

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

#36 2012-02-14 05:06:27

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

#37 2012-02-14 13:28:26

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

slinger wrote:

#38 2012-02-14 15:14:56

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

#39 2012-02-14 18:02:00

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

slinger wrote:

#40 2012-02-15 01:15:29

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

#41 2012-02-15 02:54:22

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

fanofcena wrote:

slinger wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:

#42 2012-02-15 03:04:50

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

jji7skyline wrote:

fanofcena wrote:

slinger wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:

#43 2012-02-15 03:21:14

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

#44 2012-02-15 03:21:25

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

TRocket wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

fanofcena wrote:

MyRedNeptune wrote:

#45 2012-02-15 03:37:14

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

#46 2012-02-15 03:46:58

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

Agentpieface wrote:

#47 2012-02-15 03:48:59

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

Agentpieface wrote:

#48 2012-02-15 03:53:05

Re: Recently got GIMP and I wanted to share some of my work :)

slinger wrote: