It Shouldn't Just Be In Signatures. It Should Also Be In Just Ordinary Posts. If It Wasn't This Way,People Would Get Rid Of Their Signatures. They'd Just Put The Image At The End Of Each Post.
Offline
ImagineIt wrote:
maxskywalker wrote:
I'd like no limit. If there has to be one, make it 750 pixels minimum. 1,000 would be nice. Something that most Scratchers who use images in their sigs won't ever run into but troublemakers who drew their own 100,000,000 pixel things will be limited with. I mean, 150 pixels? That's tiny!
Paddle2See wrote:
750? That's huge! 150 isn't too small!
Okay, fine. I wasn't really thinking. 500? 250 at least. 300's a nice size.
Offline
Nice signature! it's a shame you can only use 150
Offline
ClickandKnow wrote:
Nice signature! it's a shame you can only use 150
That's my point.
Offline
kayybee wrote:
300‽
Take someone's signature. Double it. There's 300.
Now think if everyone had that. It'd be longer than most posts.
And now who would draw a hundred million pixel image?
Alright, fine. 250, then. 200 if it's still to large.
Offline
maxskywalker wrote:
kayybee wrote:
300‽
Take someone's signature. Double it. There's 300.
Now think if everyone had that. It'd be longer than most posts.
And now who would draw a hundred million pixel image?Alright, fine. 250, then. 200 if it's still to large.
It used to be 200 (200 was okay, but they recommended 150).
Just make your pictures smaller.
Offline
Hey, here's an idea! How about a little check box in the Profile>Display section that says 'Cut off overlarge signatures'? Sound good? Bad? Why?
Last edited by maxskywalker (2011-10-28 11:45:15)
Offline
+1
illusionist wrote:
I'd like 200.
Offline
maxskywalker wrote:
Hey, here's an idea! How about a little check box in the Profile>Display section that says 'Cut off overlarge signatures'? Sound good? Bad? Why?
Uh, good? Bad? Does this belong in the suggestions forum?
Offline
maxskywalker wrote:
maxskywalker wrote:
Hey, here's an idea! How about a little check box in the Profile>Display section that says 'Cut off overlarge signatures'? Sound good? Bad? Why?
Uh, good? Bad? Does this belong in the suggestions forum?
Yes, and good and bad.
That might be hard to do, optionally cutting off large signatures...
Offline
kayybee wrote:
maxskywalker wrote:
maxskywalker wrote:
Hey, here's an idea! How about a little check box in the Profile>Display section that says 'Cut off overlarge signatures'? Sound good? Bad? Why?
Uh, good? Bad? Does this belong in the suggestions forum?
Yes, and good and bad.
That might be hard to do, optionally cutting off large signatures...
Better yet, ask "What's the maximum height of signatures shown to you?" and if nobody gets to that setting set the default to 175. I know this belongs in suggestions, but honestly I could hardly care less about signature sizes (with the exception of a giant page stretcher that goes forever, but scratch does a good job to avoid those) so I'm not gonna bother with the suggestion. Someone else can, if you want to(speaking to whoever reads this).
Offline
Even though I can't have a siggie yet, if I manage to get the Scratcher status then the images I'd use would probably be around 125 pixels tall, but I'm sure other people would prefer the maximum height to be bigger.
Offline
My suggestion on a way to stop this argument, with a result that is good for everyone!
Last edited by gbear605 (2011-12-09 17:06:12)
Offline
Lightnin wrote:
Greetings Everyone!
Some of you may have noticed that the images in your signatures now appear smaller than they used to. We did this because we felt that threads with many large signatures can become difficult to read. We've placed a trial limit of 150 pixels on the height of images used in signatures, so images larger than that will be automatically shrunken in most browsers.
While we think there should be a limit on the size of signature images, we are interested in hearing feedback from members of the community on what that limit should be. Here are a few example images showing different image sizes:
[removed because the person who is quoting this is a new scratcher]
What do you think would be the best size limit for signatures?
On my old account (sku2000), I had a hard time fitting everything I wanted to be in my sig w/ 150 pixels, so I think 200 would be good.
Offline
I wish we could just have a little bigger sig space...
Offline
Haiming wrote:
I wish we could just have a little bigger sig space...
Ehh, there isn't really anything wrong with it. It would just encourage people to have larger sigs which can be horrid on mobile devices.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
Haiming wrote:
I wish we could just have a little bigger sig space...
Ehh, there isn't really anything wrong with it. It would just encourage people to have larger sigs which can be horrid on mobile devices.
'specially with sigs.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
Haiming wrote:
I wish we could just have a little bigger sig space...
Ehh, there isn't really anything wrong with it. It would just encourage people to have larger sigs which can be horrid on mobile devices.
agreed i sometimes use my psp which has to have the siggies turned off
Offline
150 pixels is a lot. A comfortable signature size is around 100.
Offline