It still redirects for me.
Offline
scimonster wrote:
It still redirects for me.
![]()
It does, and they need that, but New Scratchers can't post them as links.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
It still redirects for me.
![]()
It does, and they need that, but New Scratchers can't post them as links.
Oh, that was what got fixed. Now they need to fix that New Scratchers can't link to the wiki... or did they do that already?
Offline
scimonster wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
It still redirects for me.
![]()
It does, and they need that, but New Scratchers can't post them as links.
Oh, that was what got fixed. Now they need to fix that New Scratchers can't link to the wiki... or did they do that already?
Really? The original code shouldn't have prevented that... if it did, we should fix it! Can you confirm and comment to me?
Offline
scimonster wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
It does, and they need that, but New Scratchers can't post them as links.
Oh, that was what got fixed. Now they need to fix that New Scratchers can't link to the wiki... or did they do that already?
Well I can do that...
http://wiki.scratch.mit.edu/wiki/Scratch
Offline
mattlai2 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
It does, and they need that, but New Scratchers can't post them as links.
Oh, that was what got fixed. Now they need to fix that New Scratchers can't link to the wiki... or did they do that already?
Well I can do that...
http://wiki.scratch.mit.edu/wiki/Scratch
can I also post a link to Scratch Suggestions? How about the documentation, at info.scratch.mit.edu. The statistics?
Yes? Good, all those glitches hav been fixed
Offline
Lightnin wrote:
scimonster wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
It does, and they need that, but New Scratchers can't post them as links.Oh, that was what got fixed. Now they need to fix that New Scratchers can't link to the wiki... or did they do that already?
Really? The original code shouldn't have prevented that... if it did, we should fix it! Can you confirm and comment to me?
This bug. As you can see by my post from this account, and also the block lib account, it was a while before you actually fixed it since you said you would.
Offline
scimonster wrote:
Lightnin wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Oh, that was what got fixed. Now they need to fix that New Scratchers can't link to the wiki... or did they do that already?Really? The original code shouldn't have prevented that... if it did, we should fix it! Can you confirm and comment to me?
This bug. As you can see by my post from this account, and also the block lib account, it was a while before you actually fixed it since you said you would.
*Sigh*, yes, that'll happen. It actually was fixed, but someone else committed some changes in front of it that weren't tested, so we didn't "push" it right away, and then it got lost for a while. Sorry about that! Coordinating development is hard. This kind of problem is one reason why I'm glad we're going to switch to Git from SVN. Git can handle merges better, so we wouldn't get stuck with working tested code that didn't make sense to push to the server.
Anyway, should be all good now.
Offline
Lightnin wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Lightnin wrote:
Really? The original code shouldn't have prevented that... if it did, we should fix it! Can you confirm and comment to me?
This bug. As you can see by my post from this account, and also the block lib account, it was a while before you actually fixed it since you said you would.
*Sigh*, yes, that'll happen. It actually was fixed, but someone else committed some changes in front of it that weren't tested, so we didn't "push" it right away, and then it got lost for a while. Sorry about that! Coordinating development is hard. This kind of problem is one reason why I'm glad we're going to switch to Git from SVN. Git can handle merges better, so we wouldn't get stuck with working tested code that didn't make sense to push to the server.
Anyway, should be all good now.
oh. Seems my comment(list) above proved it. The redirect url doesnt work at all now though; even redirecting to *.scratch.mit.edu doesn't work.
Offline
ignore_user wrote:
Lightnin wrote:
scimonster wrote:
This bug. As you can see by my post from this account, and also the block lib account, it was a while before you actually fixed it since you said you would.*Sigh*, yes, that'll happen. It actually was fixed, but someone else committed some changes in front of it that weren't tested, so we didn't "push" it right away, and then it got lost for a while. Sorry about that! Coordinating development is hard. This kind of problem is one reason why I'm glad we're going to switch to Git from SVN. Git can handle merges better, so we wouldn't get stuck with working tested code that didn't make sense to push to the server.
Anyway, should be all good now.oh. Seems my comment(list) above proved it. The redirect url doesnt work at all now though; even redirecting to *.scratch.mit.edu doesn't work.
![]()
Yep. But there's no need for that, is there? You don't need to use the redirect to Scratch when you can just link directly. XD
Offline
Lightnin wrote:
ignore_user wrote:
Lightnin wrote:
*Sigh*, yes, that'll happen. It actually was fixed, but someone else committed some changes in front of it that weren't tested, so we didn't "push" it right away, and then it got lost for a while. Sorry about that! Coordinating development is hard. This kind of problem is one reason why I'm glad we're going to switch to Git from SVN. Git can handle merges better, so we wouldn't get stuck with working tested code that didn't make sense to push to the server.
Anyway, should be all good now.oh. Seems my comment(list) above proved it. The redirect url doesnt work at all now though; even redirecting to *.scratch.mit.edu doesn't work.
![]()
Yep. But there's no need for that, is there? You don't need to use the redirect to Scratch when you can just link directly. XD
I suppose.
Offline
Mokat wrote:
WE BETTER MAKE SURE SPAMMERS DONT SEE THIS!!
It's been fixed; New Scratchers can't post those links.
Offline
Mokat wrote:
WE BETTER MAKE SURE SPAMMERS DONT SEE THIS!!
I think it's been fixed now.
Offline