Scratch

Only 48 hours? That's pretty intense.
Good luck to you 

Paddle2See wrote:

.they might have issues with it as it does not produce a binary executable (as required by the rules).  On the other hand, they may just be concerned that everybody can actually run it...and that should not be an issue with Scratch, particularly if your project runs well online.  You might also be able to use the Scratch2Exe utility.

I use the scratch to exe all the time to build executables to show stuff off to people I know. In this case it will probably have the default icon.

It will probably take more time to set up the web page but thanks for the concerns.

I can't post the source yet , but will once I submit it.

Not quite done - but could probably do it by 10 (24 hours)

latest screen shot

http://ludum.twobrotherssoftware.com/ss6.gif

I love scratch for this.  Right now I am in the polish stage. I am taking my inanimate objects and giving them a few images and adding a thread to scroll through them.

Sounds really cool! How do you join? How often are they hosted?

It's up with 12 hours to spare

http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Mike_W/495022

Now in two weeks I will let you know how I did

I promised I would post how I did.

Ove    Fun    Inn    The    Pol    Gra    Aud    Hum    Tec    Foo    Jou    Tim
    3    4    3    4    2    2        3    2        4   
    3    3    3    2    3    3    2    2    3        3   
    3    3    3    4    3    3    4        3           
    2    2    4    4    2    3    4    4    2           
    3    2    3    3    2    3    3    2    3        4   
    3    2    2    4    2    3    3        2        3   
    3    4    3    4    3        4        2        3   
    3    2    3    3    2    2    2    2    3           
    3    3    4    4    2    2    3        3        4   
    2    3    2    3    2    2    3    2    2           
    2    2    2    3    2    2    2        2        3   
    3    3    4    4    2    2    3        2           
    2    3                2    3                   
    2    2    4    4    1    2    2                   
    3    2    4    4    2    2    4    2    2        4   
    1    1    1    3    1    1    2        1           
    2.56    2.56    3.00    3.53    2.07    2.27    2.93    2.43    2.29    -    3.50    -

Testing is anonymous - peer review. I do think that one rating was payback for a couple comments I made about python dependency issues that were making it alot of work to judge some entries - as python has py2exe.

There are some issues with the browser based version that don't exist with the stand alone exe. And the feedback I did get makes me think most people used that. Don't blame

I would in the future only release the exe as it runs better.

Next time what would I do different.  Instead of testing 30 games the rest of the weekend - I'd post a follow up, I would do a time line and post that two days later, and post some bug fix two days after that.

They extended voting this time, with one comment that way some project that wern't as good could get some feedback and votes. So there is an assumption that if you get initial votes you must be good.

Was I the best project out there - no - did the one I think was best win - no - it took third in overall.  Scratch did well in my opinion - I had my game engine built in 90 minutes.

Will I do it again yes.

My project http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Mike_W/495022

Ludum site http://www.ludumdare.com/