This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#1 2012-01-02 15:15:19

rdococ
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-10-11
Posts: 1000+

Negative Age data for how old Scratchers are?

On the Stats, there's a chart that tells you how old Scratchers are on the website. Surprisingly, they store data for negative age, and the invalid data says over 1 Scratcher has a negative age. This confuses me, because is a person has a negative age it means he/she is not born yet, meaning the person couldn't exist to register.

Offline

 

#2 2012-01-02 15:15:54

RedRocker227
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-10-26
Posts: 1000+

Re: Negative Age data for how old Scratchers are?

Huh?
When I looked at it, the youngest age was five, I think.

EDIT: The youngest user is five :

EDIT2: That's really odd.
The :\ misses out the \

Last edited by RedRocker227 (2012-01-02 15:17:51)


Why

Offline

 

#3 2012-01-02 15:17:23

CheeseMunchy
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-10-13
Posts: 1000+

Re: Negative Age data for how old Scratchers are?

RedRocker227 wrote:

Huh?
When I looked at it, the youngest age was five, I think.

EDIT: The youngest user is five :

Thats right, the lowest it goes is 5.


6418,

Offline

 

#4 2012-01-02 15:17:40

roijac
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-01-19
Posts: 1000+

Re: Negative Age data for how old Scratchers are?

change the range of showed ages

and they just told the wrong age, probably  smile

Offline

 

#5 2012-01-02 15:18:25

NeilWest
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-01-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: Negative Age data for how old Scratchers are?

I can be partly responsible for incorrect age stats, my dad (of the same name as my username) also chose my age to be 0! Uhh...

Offline

 

#6 2012-01-02 15:18:55

rdococ
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-10-11
Posts: 1000+

Re: Negative Age data for how old Scratchers are?

No, you can select Options at the bottom and change the range. The proper minimun is the invalid age of -1208 -- that's really "young". And the proper maximun is 345, which is too old for us to genetically be alive anymore.

EDIT: This is getting popular? Probably because I put it in the wrong place! Oops!

Last edited by rdococ (2012-01-02 15:19:51)

Offline

 

#7 2012-01-02 15:21:35

coolstuff
Community Moderator
Registered: 2008-03-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: Negative Age data for how old Scratchers are?

rdococ wrote:

No, you can select Options at the bottom and change the range. The proper minimun is the invalid age of -1208 -- that's really "young". And the proper maximun is 345, which is too old for us to genetically be alive anymore.

EDIT: This is getting popular? Probably because I put it in the wrong place! Oops!

Yup, I'll move it to All About Scratch for you.  smile

And even while you can set the minimum age to -1208, I've not been able to see anything past "1."

Offline

 

#8 2012-01-02 15:44:09

Zeusking19
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-07-10
Posts: 1000+

Re: Negative Age data for how old Scratchers are?

coolstuff wrote:

rdococ wrote:

No, you can select Options at the bottom and change the range. The proper minimun is the invalid age of -1208 -- that's really "young". And the proper maximun is 345, which is too old for us to genetically be alive anymore.

EDIT: This is getting popular? Probably because I put it in the wrong place! Oops!

Yup, I'll move it to All About Scratch for you.  smile

And even while you can set the minimum age to -1208, I've not been able to see anything past "1."

Me neither.


http://i49.tinypic.com/2w7e1jm.pnghttp://dragcave.net/image/eFGFz.gifhttp://dragcave.net/image/9hE5q.gif

Offline

 

Board footer