I have Facebook for keeping in touch with friends, and Scratchers c:
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
I have Facebook for keeping in touch with friends, and Scratchers c:
Good. c:
Offline
slinger wrote:
I have a face and a book, but no facebook
Offline
Freakish wrote:
nightmarescratcher wrote:
Freakish wrote:
Um, why?Cause it's awesome.
That's no reason why.
Anything I say is a reason.
Offline
Nope.
Never wanted one, never will want one.
Offline
Freakish wrote:
nightmarescratcher wrote:
Freakish wrote:
That's no reason why.Anything I say is a reason.
Anything I question is a question.
trollollolollo
Offline
More information people share that will most likely end up in one place: stalkers' stalking books.
Last edited by CylonToast (2011-12-30 14:35:08)
Offline
G0D_M0D3 wrote:
I do.
I was going to post something like a picture of a guy with his face replaced with a book, saying, "Facebook: You're doing it wrong"
But I can't.
I'm seriously angry at the ST for no [img] tags.
Offline
nightmarescratcher wrote:
G0D_M0D3 wrote:
I do.
I was going to post something like a picture of a guy with his face replaced with a book, saying, "Facebook: You're doing it wrong"
But I can't.I'm seriously angry at the ST for no [img] tags.
Why?
Sure, it's annoying, but there was a valid reason for doing it.
If we enable posting images again too soon, the trolls will just come back again.
Just be patient, and the ST will enable them again.
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
nightmarescratcher wrote:
G0D_M0D3 wrote:
I do.
I was going to post something like a picture of a guy with his face replaced with a book, saying, "Facebook: You're doing it wrong"
But I can't.I'm seriously angry at the ST for no [url]tags.
Why?
Sure, it's annoying, but there was a valid reason for doing it.
If we enable posting images again too soon, the trolls will just come back again.
Just be patient, and the ST will enable them again.
'Patient' is not accessible in memory base.
Function disabled.
Offline