Scratch

my-chemical-romance wrote:

fire219 wrote:

I agree with most of this. Nintendo is awesome, and brought around many gaming revolutions. In fact, despite I hate the graphics on it, I play my Wii more than the Xbox 360 (fully loaded S model with 250GB HDD and Kinect). You just can't beat the gameplay on it. 

However, Microsoft isn't just a copycat. The Kinect is light years ahead of the Wiimote and PS Move. IDK why everyone says its accuracy is bad, I have NEVER had any problems. In fact, the Kinect has better accuracy than the Wiimote in my experience.   People always hate on the Kinect, but the problem is the games, not the sensor. Most of the games for it are for little kids. I want to see Portal 2 with Kinect compatibility! 

As for Sony, you are right about them. They have no innovation, imagination, or online service security. 

I think Microsoft just took an eyetoy and remodeled it and called it something different, it's so unoriginal compared to the eyetoy I don't get why people fail to see it.

The two are similar, but the Kinect has much more advanced capabilities, such as being able to read depth, and working more than half the time. The EyeToy really is just a camera with some slightly clever software.

my-chemical-romance wrote:

The only thing holding Nintendo back is graphics, but that'll change with the wii-U. The Wii-U currently has the most powerful processor known to man, and the graphics are going to be amazing. Try monster hunter tri, it has amazing graphics and the gameplay is brilliant, Microsoft just ride off other's fame, like paying Notch to not release Minecraft for anything other than the Xbox.

actually i think you're forgetting that most PCs have better processors than all three consoles- including the wii-U
new PCs anyway