stevetheipad wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
Uhh... I don't see why not. That's a completely different part of the site and it's Scratcher-run, so admins are appointed, not elected. That alone shouldn't be a reason why someone couldn't run for mod. It's the other things you've done.
Oh, okay. Well both you and sci would make awesome mods
Me?
He was talking to me, as he quoted one of my posts in reply.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
stevetheipad wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
Oh, okay. Well both you and sci would make awesome modsMe?
He was talking to me, as he quoted one of my posts in reply.
I know. I'm asking him If I would be a good moderator.
Offline
nightmarescratcher wrote:
I'll vote for veggieman001.
You gotta get more posts, dude.
Aww thanks. I'm still not sure whether I'm running or not, and it's even less likely I'd get into the finalists. Thanks for the support though. It means a lot. :')
Offline
nightmarescratcher wrote:
I'll vote for veggieman001.
You gotta get more posts, dude.
Well, it does not matter how many posts you have. [example]Would you vote for someone that has 5,000 posts, but all of them are spam? Or would you vote for someone who only has 500 posts, but they are all productive?[/example] You may want to think of your own post count that way too.
Offline
JJROCKER wrote:
nightmarescratcher wrote:
I'll vote for veggieman001.
You gotta get more posts, dude.Well, it does not matter how many posts you have. [example]Would you vote for someone that has 5,000 posts, but all of them are spam? Or would you vote for someone who only has 500 posts, but they are all productive?[/example] You may want to think of your own post count that way too.
Nobody really spams, per say. And post counts are often used as a (pretty good IMO) counter for activity because they show how much time you spend on the forums, I think.
Offline
Question to all Scratchers:
I know I won't be old enough until late 2012, but, if I was old enough:
Would you vote for me? You can't say I'm inexperienced with the website.
You can't. I could name a fact about any active user.
Offline
mattb777 wrote:
Question to all Scratchers:
I know I won't be old enough until late 2012, but, if I was old enough:
Would you vote for me? You can't say I'm inexperienced with the website.
You can't. I could name a fact about any active user.
Err probably not. Name a fact about me
Last edited by JJROCKER (2011-12-08 00:25:13)
Offline
JJROCKER wrote:
Maybe we shouldn't worry about the election yet
Hey Veggie.
Hey.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
Maybe we shouldn't worry about the election yet
Hey Veggie.Hey.
Hey.
Offline
Sorry, no. You've been fairly active on the forums and though your posts aren't spam or anything, I haven't seen them as very helpful. Maybe you should check out All About Scratch and New Scratchers and try and help some people out there.
Offline
No offense, but you're kinda new (compared to other users who'll be running). I still think you'd make a great mod though, you're just not that experienced. Sorry.
Offline
mattb777 wrote:
Question to all Scratchers:
I know I won't be old enough until late 2012, but, if I was old enough:
Would you vote for me? You can't say I'm inexperienced with the website.
You can't. I could name a fact about any active user.
What topic do I post in most?
Offline
Offline
Just a question.
If I ran (I'm eligable now)
Would you vote for me?
Offline
rabbit1131 wrote:
Just a question.
If I ran (I'm eligable now)
Would you vote for me?
No.
Offline
rabbit1131 wrote:
Just a question.
If I ran (I'm eligable now)
Would you vote for me?
No, sorry. You don't seem very mod-like and to be honest, a bit braggy.
Offline
werdna123 wrote:
rabbit1131 wrote:
Just a question.
If I ran (I'm eligable now)
Would you vote for me?No, sorry. You don't seem very mod-like and to be honest, a bit braggy.
(this sums up my thoughts)
Offline
Go veggie. I won't vote though. 'w'
Offline
Earthboundjeff wrote:
Lol
Offline