Scratch

turntechGodhead wrote:

thanks cheddargirl

is there any way to distinguish what mild profanities are actually swears?

The Scratch Team and the Scratch moderators did have discussion about this. Strong cuss words are obviously not allowed, but when it comes to other euphemisms intended to replace cussing, then it becomes more of a hassle as to what is and isn't allowed on the website (largely because users here grew up in different communities with different upbringings) - for example, there was once a point where "sucks" (like in "this project sucks") was debated as to whether or not it was considered to be inappropriate for the community (whenever that word is used now is examined on a  case-by-case basis).

Obviously, almost any set of words and phrases can be abused to convey an unfriendly and/or disrespectful meaning - and for the most part, stuff like that is not allowed on the website. A fair rule of thumb when posting is to keep it respectful in tone.

This probably might not be the answer you are looking for. I sent over the question to the Scratch Team, hopefully they can better clarify the issue about swearing better than I can. ^^;

FlexiStudio wrote:

Thank you cheddargirl, on topic, when do you think they will post the information      ?

Soon, the Scratch Team is just fixing up some last minute things. 

FlexiStudio wrote:

Yay! Great! After it's out, you'll be reading the Scratchers Inforumer, right? New logo and everything!

Yes, I will.

But were now getting a wee bit off track. Let's keep this topic, well, on-topic. 

FlexiStudio wrote:

Sorry, got carried away. Anyway, I can't wait what the Team has decided. Even if it's bad 

Bad news = good paper

soupoftomato wrote:

FlexiStudio wrote:

Sorry, got carried away. Anyway, I can't wait what the Team has decided. Even if it's bad 

Bad news = good paper

Too true. Media thrives on calamities, although perhaps not as much so on this site. 
On topic, I'm thrilled that the team is coming out with the announcement. Will the new election entail any further changes to the current moderation system?

Telemachus wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

FlexiStudio wrote:

Sorry, got carried away. Anyway, I can't wait what the Team has decided. Even if it's bad 

Bad news = good paper

Too true. Media thrives on calamities, although perhaps not as much so on this site. 
On topic, I'm thrilled that the team is coming out with the announcement. Will the new election entail any further changes to the current moderation system?

It gives the controversial edge that you need for discussion.

poopo wrote:

Hmm, I wonder when they'll post.

How about now? 

It will be interesting to see who runs!
-12three-

FlexiStudio wrote:

Ok. I'm running. <- This good  ?

Yeah! You have my vote. You make wonderful guides! (But post that in the other thread.)

waveOSBeta wrote:

Oh, How I wish I were 14.

Me too.

WindozeNT wrote:

So when's this election thing going to kick off? I turn 14 this December.

This October - I'm afraid you'll have to wait just a few more months...

Dazachi wrote:

I am wishing luck to everybody who is nominated. I hope you will become candidates.

Thanks. I'm going to miss you as a mod D:

So, I've taken to the task of writing a [rather long] anecdote of my experiences, and the responsibilities, of being a moderator. You might want to view that thread here if you're interested.