coolstuff wrote:
Chrischb wrote:
Sorry, but I don't support... the possibility of dangerous links is really big in my opinion.
![]()
Really? Even if you can only link to projects on the Scratch website?
I'm sorry, but I don't agree with you - there's no possible way this could be harmful.
Did you see bhz's post (#9)? Note the end of the url.
Offline
iamrpk wrote:
demosthenes wrote:
Why would you use it though . . . I'd want the ability to draw content from webpages, but that could result in unsafe interactions.
Huh?
This block wouldn't do anything. All it would do would be to open up a webpage. That's not very exciting. I want ability to draw content from webpages.
Offline
I would support, but I agree that the Cons out weigh the Pros.
Offline
Jonathanpb wrote:
coolstuff wrote:
Chrischb wrote:
Sorry, but I don't support... the possibility of dangerous links is really big in my opinion.
![]()
Really? Even if you can only link to projects on the Scratch website?
I'm sorry, but I don't agree with you - there's no possible way this could be harmful.Did you see bhz's post (#9)? Note the end of the url.
![]()
Then restrict it only to projects - no download. And besides, Scratch projects can't contain viruses, so...
demosthenes wrote:
This block wouldn't do anything. All it would do would be to open up a webpage. That's not very exciting. I want ability to draw content from webpages.
I agree - but this is a start.
Offline
One point - when would you use the block? It's completely unnecessary - you would never need to use it in your projects.
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
Chrischb wrote:
Sorry, but I don't support... the possibility of dangerous links is really big in my opinion.
![]()
Really? Even if you can only link to projects on the Scratch website?
I'm sorry, but I don't agree with you - there's no possible way this could be harmful.
Unless you link to an inappropriate project...
....................................
@Jonathanpb: You could use it to link to a sequel, for example - I see good uses for it.
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
BWOG wrote:
But how would it work exactly?
You would type the rest of the URL into the block, then when the person clicks on it, they are sent to that project.
I support!
I think it's a great idea! We could make some fantastic tutorials with that block...it could help make up for the lack of structure of the Galleries. It would also be great for making really big games or game sequels.
bhz wrote:
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/7209/instavirus.gif
instant virus.
Well, it could be restricted to running projects rather than bringing up any web page. It could also be restricted to a limited number of threads so that it can't overload the computer.
Offline
If you just type in the name of a project, then what if two projects had the same name?
If it's a real link, they could still do bad things (e.g. What bhz did, but some people could do worse)
Offline
Vista4563 wrote:
coolstuff wrote:
Chrischb wrote:
Sorry, but I don't support... the possibility of dangerous links is really big in my opinion.
![]()
Really? Even if you can only link to projects on the Scratch website?
I'm sorry, but I don't agree with you - there's no possible way this could be harmful.Someone might hack the block to make it a dangerous link.
True some can easily do that
Offline
fanofcena wrote:
Vista4563 wrote:
coolstuff wrote:
Really? Even if you can only link to projects on the Scratch website?
I'm sorry, but I don't agree with you - there's no possible way this could be harmful.Someone might hack the block to make it a dangerous link.
True some can easily do that
People could hack and make that block right now... It would just make it easier. And besides, with hacked blocks, it's not the "official" version of Scratch, and wouldn't be distributed as widespread.
Offline