joefarebrother wrote:
Also, I think an empty ring should report the identity function.
bharvey wrote:
Votes?
-1 because snap! should not guess what you mean. it should do what you mean, if it's not understanding it, explain better.
Offline
roijac_test wrote:
joefarebrother wrote:
Also, I think an empty ring should report the identity function.
bharvey wrote:
Votes?
-1 because snap! should not guess what you mean. it should do what you mean, if it's not understanding it, explain better.
i mean that should be an option that the user specifies. They could disable it for the purposes of debugging then when you get all the bugs out or you introduce a bit where you it should report identity function, you can enable the option.
Offline
joefarebrother wrote:
well maybe it could be an option? You right click and there is a checkbox menu item "make empty rings report identity" and when it's checked, any empty rings report an identity function, otherwise, you get an error message.
#5000th post
Brian, you should have claimed it.
Offline
shadow_7283 wrote:
Brian, you should have claimed it.
Nah, I'm an adult, I'm supposed to be too mature to compete with kids.
Hey, shadow, quite a while back you expressed interest in volunteering to redo the reference manual pictures for the Snap! version. Are you still interested in that, and will you have time this summer? Because we're almost at the point (Jens is working on zebra coloring, which I think is the last big obstacle) where the non-OOP part will be ready to do that. You're allowed to back out.
(And other people are welcome to share the task.)
Offline
bharvey wrote:
Sorry for the delayed response;
No problem.
I had to put some attention into the stuff I actually get paid for.
Out of sheer curiosity, what might that be? I just realized maybe developing Snap! and answering questions on this thread wasn't your full-time job...
Offline
Hardmath123 wrote:
Out of sheer curiosity, what might that be? I just realized maybe developing Snap! and answering questions on this thread wasn't your full-time job...
It feels that way to me, too. But they pay me to teach computer science at the University of California, Berkeley. And since we got our NSF grant, they pay me in part to plot to take over the world of high school computer science with Snap! and the Beauty and Joy of Computing.
Last edited by bharvey (2012-04-28 13:28:28)
Offline
bharvey wrote:
Hey, shadow, quite a while back you expressed interest in volunteering to redo the reference manual pictures for the Snap!
I'd love to contribute! I'll definitely have time, so let me know what you need!
Offline
bharvey wrote:
(And other people are welcome to share the task.)
I can help, I'm on "vacation".
Offline
bharvey wrote:
shadow_7283 wrote:
Brian, you should have claimed it.
Nah, I'm an adult, I'm supposed to be too mature to compete with kids.
I'm not a kid, i'm a teenager.
Offline
joefarebrother wrote:
bharvey wrote:
shadow_7283 wrote:
Brian, you should have claimed it.
Nah, I'm an adult, I'm supposed to be too mature to compete with kids.
I'm not a kid, i'm a teenager.
I'm a teenager as well and I still count teenagers as kids
Offline
can we get back on topic?
Offline
joefarebrother wrote:
can we get back on topic?
Sure. Status report: We are all holding our breath waiting for Jens to finish debugging zebra coloring (partly done), and then we can get to work on the manual.
P.S. You sure you don't want us to annoy you some more? <- jk
Last edited by bharvey (2012-04-28 20:25:55)
Offline
Snap has gotten really good since I last tried it!
Offline
xly wrote:
@Jens
When saving an application I've got this Error message :
"Save failed: Error:QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ER\DOM Exception 22
I think that's your browser telling you you've saved too many files. Maybe there's an option somewhere to increase the space available for Snap to use?
Offline
@ Jens & blob8108
To be honest this application consists in creating a large wargame map by assembling 4 smaller *.jpg map, each quarter of map being represented by a sprite costume. The next step is to add and move on this map several army units. This type of application works with Byob but I can imagine that Snap! has still size limitations.
Offline
"@xly, look here http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=58985"
Thanks for your contribution. Each of the four costumes is a jpg file of 400 Mo , put alltogether this is less than a medium definition jpg photo.
Anyway I'm going to make a test with Firefox.
Offline
xly wrote:
"@xly, look here http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=58985"
Thanks for your contribution. Each of the four costumes is a jpg file of 400 Mo , put alltogether this is less than a medium definition jpg photo.
Anyway I'm going to make a test with Firefox.
Hey, xly, I noticed you quote by copying and pasting the quoted text a lot. To quote someone, you can just click the blue "quote" link in the bottom-right corner of the post rather than copying and pasting the text.
Offline
roijac wrote:
@xly, look here http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issue … l?id=58985
Well, that's a bit of an issue. I hadn't realised the size limit for localStorage was so low...
Offline
Hardmath123 wrote:
xly wrote:
"@xly, look here http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=58985"
Thanks for your contribution. Each of the four costumes is a jpg file of 400 Mo , put alltogether this is less than a medium definition jpg photo.
Anyway I'm going to make a test with Firefox.Hey, xly, I noticed you quote by copying and pasting the quoted text a lot. To quote someone, you can just click the blue "quote" link in the bottom-right corner of the post rather than copying and pasting the text.
Thanks for advice. You know, an old chap like me (71 this year) has some difficulties to change its old habits.
I have tested the application in discussion with Firefox. Very unstable, but from time to time I succeeded to save the application. (the size of each of the four files is not 400 Mo as mentioned , but 400 K. This means that my 4 files all together have the size of a "low definition" digital picture.)
Offline
xly wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
xly wrote:
"@xly, look here http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=58985"
Thanks for your contribution. Each of the four costumes is a jpg file of 400 Mo , put alltogether this is less than a medium definition jpg photo.
Anyway I'm going to make a test with Firefox.Hey, xly, I noticed you quote by copying and pasting the quoted text a lot. To quote someone, you can just click the blue "quote" link in the bottom-right corner of the post rather than copying and pasting the text.
Thanks for advice. You know, an old chap like me (71 this year) has some difficulties to change its old habits.
I have tested the application in discussion with Firefox. Very unstable, but from time to time I succeeded to save the application. (the size of each of the four files is not 400 Mo as mentioned , but 400 K. This means that my 4 files all together have the size of a "low definition" digital picture.)
I agree, it is extremely unstable in firefox, usually using loops is what does it for me - it just freezes and I have to force end the process.
Offline