Scratch

You should probably name forum topics something more interesting than "Ok, soo..." so people actually know what it is 

I don't know if I support this, I think it would just become a "feeding frenzy". A lot of younger users aren't mature enough to deal with fame (I have seen this for myself on many occasions). Furthermore, many, many people will be wanting a spot. So how will we select which ones to feature? Maybe there be a topic where users give speeches or something.

But anyways, I think fame should be earned and not given. This is why I like our front page, and curation, because they earned their fame through hard work and good programming. I think handing out fame like this, to people who may or may not deserve or be able to handle it, is not a good idea.

So I don't support.

I too, support.

me 4!

Wes64 wrote:

You should probably name forum topics something more interesting than "Ok, soo..." so people actually know what it is 

I don't know if I support this, I think it would just become a "feeding frenzy". A lot of younger users aren't mature enough to deal with fame (I have seen this for myself on many occasions). Furthermore, many, many people will be wanting a spot. So how will we select which ones to feature? Maybe there be a topic where users give speeches or something.

But anyways, I think fame should be earned and not given. This is why I like our front page, and curation, because they earned their fame through hard work and good programming. I think handing out fame like this, to people who may or may not deserve or be able to handle it, is not a good idea.

So I don't support.

It would be earned. You'd have to have helpful topics, and comments around the community, and you'd have to have a Scratcher rank.

Oh, and funeleplant, I changed it to a week. Also, what about the Top Loved, or the Top Viewed?? Do those make users sad? How about deleting all of the Top ___ stuff?

coolhogs wrote:

Wes64 wrote:

You should probably name forum topics something more interesting than "Ok, soo..." so people actually know what it is 

I don't know if I support this, I think it would just become a "feeding frenzy". A lot of younger users aren't mature enough to deal with fame (I have seen this for myself on many occasions). Furthermore, many, many people will be wanting a spot. So how will we select which ones to feature? Maybe there be a topic where users give speeches or something.

But anyways, I think fame should be earned and not given. This is why I like our front page, and curation, because they earned their fame through hard work and good programming. I think handing out fame like this, to people who may or may not deserve or be able to handle it, is not a good idea.

So I don't support.

It would be earned. You'd have to have helpful topics, and comments around the community, and you'd have to have a Scratcher rank.

Oh, and funeleplant, I changed it to a week. Also, what about the Top Loved, or the Top Viewed?? Do those make users sad? How about deleting all of the Top ___ stuff?

I don't support and you're not gonna change my mind. Anyways, the people on Top Viewed are there for a REASON.

777w wrote:

rarely is there a project thats actually really good or innovative

Thats actually a pretty big generalisation. Scratch isn't just about your tastes. If you don't like what's on the most-viewed, apply to be curator.

Wes64 wrote:

777w wrote:

rarely is there a project thats actually really good or innovative

Thats actually a pretty big generalisation. Scratch isn't just about your tastes. If you don't like what's on the most-viewed, apply to be curator.

lol id never be a good curator

Ecliptic wrote:

trinary wrote:

I do not support.

If you don't, you should at least explain your reasoning.

Why, so you can accuse him of not supporting? 
Just kidding.

777w wrote:

funelephant wrote:

Wes64 wrote:

Thats actually a pretty big generalisation. Scratch isn't just about your tastes. If you don't like what's on the most-viewed, apply to be curator.

i already replied to that
if it need more elaboration, give me a good example of an original, inspirational project in the top viewed section recently. and i dont always thoroughly pick through the top viewed section project by project so excuse me if im wrong

I agree with you.
Most top-loved projects are two-minute projects by famous scratchers.

Wes64 wrote:

777w wrote:

funelephant wrote:

i already replied to that
if it need more elaboration, give me a good example of an original, inspirational project in the top viewed section recently. and i dont always thoroughly pick through the top viewed section project by project so excuse me if im wrong

Here.

i havent even seen that yet and i knew youd link to it :P
its interesting but not as groundbreaking and revolutionary as id hope

Last edited by 777w (2012-06-25 20:46:22)

wolvesstar97 wrote:

777w wrote:

funelephant wrote:

i already replied to that
if it need more elaboration, give me a good example of an original, inspirational project in the top viewed section recently. and i dont always thoroughly pick through the top viewed section project by project so excuse me if im wrong

I agree with you.
Most top-loved projects are two-minute projects by famous scratchers.

you mean 2 seconds

funelephant wrote:

777w wrote:

Wes64 wrote:

Here.

i havent even seen that yet and i knew youd link to it 
its interesting but not as groundbreaking and revolutionary as id hope

I don't think that a project can exactly be "revolutionary".

yes, it can
a simple easy to work with physics engine with ultra-realistic physics, a feature length smooth animation with a good plot and everything from scratch including the music, even an actual working mmorpg.
give me one of those and ill be satisfied