No-one has been replying to my posts sometimes. Here are all of my posts that haven't been replied to:
Not sure about this one: http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic … 8#p1282108
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic … 3#p1281383
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic … 7#p1282227
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic … 2#p1283692
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic … 9#p1284049
This has been around a long time: http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic … 2#p1281022
Not sure about this one either: http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic … 3#p1285713
I'm just wondering why no-one replies; is it my style of writing, what I say in my posts, or something else? (And please don't not reply to this )
(Sorry if this sounds impatient, I'm just wondering why no-one replies )
Offline
Sometimes people just don't have anything to say
Offline
I see the problem
1. They are too long. People generally don't want to read a huge block of writing and can't be bothered to read on.
2. when you want to use scratch blocks, always use the proper [scratchbIocks] and [/scratchbIocks] so do
when gf clicked repeat <forever> change variable by (number)instead of just this
Last edited by PhirripSyrrip (2012-06-21 17:27:16)
Offline
Well, it depends.
Sometimes people don't know what to say or don't understand what you're trying to achieve, so they don't say anything.
Other cases, the reply is buried deep in a thread so it's not see right away by others (especially if it's a sticky thread that isn't viewed often).
And some forums just don't get that many replies. For example, with Show and Tell, most people click the link and reply on the project, not the forum thread advertising the project, so often times thread can go reply-less for a while.
On a side note, I replied in one of the links you gave.
Offline
PhirripSyrrip wrote:
I see the problem
1. They are too long. People generally don't want to read a huge block of writing and can't be bothered to read on.
2. when you want to use scratch blocks, always use the proper [scratchbIocks] and [/scratchbIocks] so dowhen gf clicked repeat <forever> change variable by (number)instead of just this
when gf clicked
repeat <forever>
change variable by (number)
1. They are actually not too long, your sample was "statistical noise". Anyway, length = detail; I learned that people get mad when they mis-read a very "concise" instruction.
2. This just makes me mad (99.99% because I was already mad at something in real life). I'm not using scratchblocks, I'm using pseudocode, which is a lot more concise than scratchblocks.
Example:
Instead of
when gf clicked repeat (10) add (pick random (1) to (10)) to [list v]That can be easily stated as
cheddargirl wrote:
Well, it depends.
Sometimes people don't know what to say or don't understand what you're trying to achieve, so they don't say anything.
Other cases, the reply is buried deep in a thread so it's not see right away by others (especially if it's a sticky thread that isn't viewed often).
And some forums just don't get that many replies. For example, with Show and Tell, most people click the link and reply on the project, not the forum thread advertising the project, so often times thread can go reply-less for a while.
On a side note, I replied in one of the links you gave.
I saw that.
@Don't understand
See PhirripSyrrip?
@Buried
I haven't seen that that much (only with things like my learning chatbot and ackermann function).
@S&T Click link
My projects don't get that many replies either.
Offline
Molybdenum wrote:
@Don't understand
See PhirripSyrrip?
Why not use the BBcode code tags?
It's a lot easier to understand pseduocode writing when it's put in code tags. Everything gets evenly spaced and the code is more readable. ;)
@Buried
I haven't seen that that much (only with things like my learning chatbot and ackermann function).
It happens, especially on sticky threads or announcement threads.
@S&T Click link
My projects don't get that many replies either.
Well, if someone doesn't really have anything to comment on a project, they'll pretty much view it and then go on to something else. As the adage goes: You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
Offline
@cheddargirl
Well, I haven't thought of that. I use visual basic a lot, but I never payed attention to the fact that it has a mono-space font.
And I never knew about that adage. Thanks for telling! (Unfortunately, sometimes I don't reply to projects, although I try hard to comment on the new projects (that's what its for, right? "Quick" comments for new projects))
This is a test of the code tags. Open my file Say "Hi!" Add 1 to the number in my file Say "Looks a lot better that when not in code tags!" End Program
Offline
Well the things you post about are rather complicated. I know nothing about the subject material. People see the post, they just can't answer.
Offline
It'd be ironic if nobody replied to this thread. :p
Offline
Yes it would. That's why I said
(And please don't not reply to this )
Offline
Molybdenum wrote:
Yes it would. That's why I said
(And please don't not reply to this )
Question... I know this is an old thread, but it seems applicable. Even though some of my projects are simply "give it a wikipedia article and laugh at its output" (yeah, see my gibberish generator), no-one is replying to them. And yes, cheddargirl, I remember what you said, but with 6 threads, the chance should be a lot lower that no-one replies. (by not replying I mean that either only me and smozzick are posting, almost no-one besides me posts, or no-one replies at all) And not all of them are in S&T.
123456
And these are just the ones I care about for now.
Offline
Molybdenum wrote:
Molybdenum wrote:
Yes it would. That's why I said
(And please don't not reply to this )
Question... I know this is an old thread, but it seems applicable. Even though some of my projects are simply "give it a wikipedia article and laugh at its output" (yeah, see my gibberish generator), no-one is replying to them. And yes, cheddargirl, I remember what you said, but with 6 threads, the chance should be a lot lower that no-one replies. (by not replying I mean that either only me and smozzick are posting, almost no-one besides me posts, or no-one replies at all) And not all of them are in S&T.
123456
And these are just the ones I care about for now.
Only one of them you mentioned is in something other than Show and Tell.
Remember when I said "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink"? It applies not just to projects but to anything that requires volunteer participation (in this case, people posting on forum threads). If people view a forum thread and have nothing to say or contribute, then they might not say anything. You can't really force people to comment if they're unfamiliar with the subject or if they don't know a way to contribute to the topic.
Offline
cheddargirl wrote:
Molybdenum wrote:
Molybdenum wrote:
Yes it would. That's why I said
Question... I know this is an old thread, but it seems applicable. Even though some of my projects are simply "give it a wikipedia article and laugh at its output" (yeah, see my gibberish generator), no-one is replying to them. And yes, cheddargirl, I remember what you said, but with 6 threads, the chance should be a lot lower that no-one replies. (by not replying I mean that either only me and smozzick are posting, almost no-one besides me posts, or no-one replies at all) And not all of them are in S&T.
123456
And these are just the ones I care about for now.Only one of them you mentioned is in something other than Show and Tell.
Remember when I said "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink"? It applies not just to projects but to anything that requires volunteer participation (in this case, people posting on forum threads). If people view a forum thread and have nothing to say or contribute, then they might not say anything. You can't really force people to comment if they're unfamiliar with the subject or if they don't know a way to contribute to the topic.
In a math person's point of view, one is not=not all are. And alright with the other part, except I was wondering how the other threads have more replies?
Offline
PhirripSyrrip wrote:
I see the problem
1. They are too long. People generally don't want to read a huge block of writing and can't be bothered to read on.
2. when you want to use scratch blocks, always use the proper [scratchbIocks] and [/scratchbIocks] so dowhen gf clicked forever change [variable v] by (number) endinstead of just this
when gf clicked
repeat <forever>
change variable by (number)
Fixed!
Last edited by SciTecCf (2012-07-05 10:47:53)
Offline
Mokat wrote:
People don't have to reply if they don't want to, and there's no way you can force people to reply.
I'm not trying to force them to. I'm just wondering why no-one is replying. (see the title)
Offline