Scratch
archived forums
#28 2012-06-26 15:10:53
Re: Xhtml5
jvvg wrote:
HTML5 (and probably XHTML5 as well) wasn't developed by W3C. It was developed by WHATWG.
Did you guys not even read the article that was linked to from here?
THe only difference betweeen HTML5 and the so-called "XHTML5" is a MIME type.
And HTML5 Isn't THAT sloppy; It just isn't as unforgiving as XHTML, so it's easier to code.
BTW, <br>, as far as I know, is not valid in HTML5.
EDIT: and here, it even says <br> is valid in XHTML
Last edited by SJRCS_011 (2012-06-26 15:17:52)
Learning to Program in a Nutshell: "You're missing a closing parentheses" - LS97
Offline
#29 2012-06-26 15:35:11
Re: Xhtml5
SJRCS_011 wrote:
The only difference betweeen HTML5 and the so-called "XHTML5" is a MIME type.
However, I'm waiting until the W3C validator supports it.
And HTML5 Isn't THAT sloppy; It just isn't as unforgiving as XHTML, so it's easier to code.
Not closing tags, not putting values for attributes, etc. is sloppy in my book.
SJRCS_011 wrote:
EDIT: and here, it even says <br> is valid in XHTML
<br> is not valid in XHTML unless you add a </br> (like it said there), because in XHTML, you must close all tags.
Goodbye, Scratch 1.4
Hello Scratch 2.0! 
Offline
#30 2012-06-26 15:41:10
Re: Xhtml5
SJRCS_011 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
HTML5 (and probably XHTML5 as well) wasn't developed by W3C. It was developed by WHATWG.
Did you guys not even read the article that was linked to from here?
THe only difference betweeen HTML5 and the so-called "XHTML5" is a MIME type.
And HTML5 Isn't THAT sloppy; It just isn't as unforgiving as XHTML, so it's easier to code.
BTW, <br>, as far as I know, is not valid in HTML5.
EDIT: and here, it even says <br> is valid in XHTML
Just because HTML5 is less strict then XHTML,it does not mean that HTML5 is easier to write,it only means that it will be faster now, but much slower in the future.
It's called 
Offline
#31 2012-06-26 16:49:39
- scratchisthebest
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-02-08
- Posts: 500+
Re: Xhtml5
LS97 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
MathWizz wrote:
Badly formatted JavaScript drives me crazy.
Yeah, I really hate people that don't end their lines with a semicolon.
Oh, trust me, there's worse...
Have you seen 140byt.es? It's crazy. Look what I found:
Code:
function(d,w,x,y,z,n,r,i,k,t){for(n=w*w*4;n-=4;d.data[n+3]=k)for(r=i=0,k=256;--k/r;i=t)t=2*r*i-y-(2-n/w/w)*z,r=r*r-i*i+x-(2-n/w%4)*z}Cookie to whoever can guess what it does. 
bye 1.4, we all loved you. but we all outgrew the site. 2.0 is a welcome change.
Offline
#32 2012-06-26 17:06:35
Re: Xhtml5
scratchisthebest wrote:
LS97 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
Yeah, I really hate people that don't end their lines with a semicolon.Oh, trust me, there's worse...
Have you seen 140byt.es? It's crazy. Look what I found:
Code:
function(d,w,x,y,z,n,r,i,k,t){for(n=w*w*4;n-=4;d.data[n+3]=k)for(r=i=0,k=256;--k/r;i=t)t=2*r*i-y-(2-n/w/w)*z,r=r*r-i*i+x-(2-n/w%4)*z}Cookie to whoever can guess what it does.
Mandelbrot? >:)
Offline
#33 2012-06-26 21:14:56
Re: Xhtml5
dvd4 wrote:
SJRCS_011 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
HTML5 (and probably XHTML5 as well) wasn't developed by W3C. It was developed by WHATWG.
Did you guys not even read the article that was linked to from here?
THe only difference betweeen HTML5 and the so-called "XHTML5" is a MIME type.
And HTML5 Isn't THAT sloppy; It just isn't as unforgiving as XHTML, so it's easier to code.
BTW, <br>, as far as I know, is not valid in HTML5.
EDIT: and here, it even says <br> is valid in XHTMLJust because HTML5 is less strict then XHTML,it does not mean that HTML5 is easier to write,it only means that it will be faster now, but much slower in the future.
XHTML is easier for a computer to understand, so it will always be faster.
Goodbye, Scratch 1.4
Hello Scratch 2.0! Offline