maxskywalker wrote:
echs wrote:
FunDude wrote:
Why are 10 year olds playing bloody, Ultra violent, cuss filled, games. The ratings are there for a reason.
Due to neurological differences, I don't know much about the average 10 year old kid, but if a 10 year old kid can comfortably play a game like that, and not be influenced, I don't see the problem.
But I doubt they could. When I was younger, I used to swear all the time, simply because I could. If I wanted to play a game like that, I would be influenced.
Offline
jukyter wrote:
maxskywalker wrote:
echs wrote:
Due to neurological differences (is it considered neurology when it's dealing with wiring and a few bits of a can opener?), I don't know much about the average 10 year old kid, but if a 10 year old kid can comfortably play a game like that, and not be influenced, I don't see the problem.
But I doubt they could. When I was younger, I used to swear all the time, simply because I could. If I wanted to play a game like that, I would be influenced.
But why is that a problem with the game? Does the not-meant audience of it subtract from the value of the game? Bronies don't make MLP any different. Besides, swearing isn't necessarily the same type of influence.
Last edited by maxskywalker (2012-06-01 19:31:09)
Offline
Um, okay. My cousin sucks at it because he does stuff like try to go stealthy and run in zigzags and other stuff you do in reality, but then the guy either runs up like a maniac and kills him, shoots in the middle of zigzags, or jumps over his fire.
Offline
XGamer42 wrote:
you're talking about the post where all the posts were like "OMGOMGOMGBLACKOPS2"?
Not really a duplicate
CheckItNow12 wrote:

Offline
XGamer42 wrote:
XGamer42 wrote:
you're talking about the post where all the posts were like "OMGOMGOMGBLACKOPS2"?
Not really a duplicateCheckItNow12 wrote:
It's still discussing Black Ops 2. AND it was made earlier.

Offline
berberberber wrote:
From the trailer, it seems CoD is now invading halo territory...
dun dun duuuun
i dont get the whole thing about halo vs call of duty, theyre really two completely different games that are both enjoyable in their own ways
Offline
CheckItNow12 wrote:
I believe you have the wrong link.
Offline
maxskywalker wrote:
jukyter wrote:
maxskywalker wrote:
Due to neurological differences (is it considered neurology when it's dealing with wiring and a few bits of a can opener?), I don't know much about the average 10 year old kid, but if a 10 year old kid can comfortably play a game like that, and not be influenced, I don't see the problem.But I doubt they could. When I was younger, I used to swear all the time, simply because I could. If I wanted to play a game like that, I would be influenced.
But why is that a problem with the game? Does the not-meant audience of it subtract from the value of the game? Bronies don't make MLP any different. Besides, swearing isn't necessarily the same type of influence.
yes, actually, it does.
it's called online play.
Offline
I like CoD, but I prefer the DESTRUCTIVENESS of Battlefield. I liked zombies on Call of Duty, and I love Spec Ops. But I still prefer vehicles and explosions
Offline
CheckItNow12 wrote:
XGamer42 wrote:
XGamer42 wrote:
you're talking about the post where all the posts were like "OMGOMGOMGBLACKOPS2"?
Not really a duplicateCheckItNow12 wrote:
It's still discussing Black Ops 2. AND it was made earlier.
This has the most posts, and they barely even discuss it

Offline