Wait, it doesn't show as an image for me. :/ I'm using Safari.
Offline
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
It's not displaying...
werdna123 wrote:
Wait, it doesn't show as an image for me. :/ I'm using Safari.
Make sure you have "Show images in Posts" turned on in your Forum Options->Display settings
Offline
werdna123 wrote:
Wait, it doesn't show as an image for me. :/ I'm using Safari.
Clicky clicky. I assume you thought the same too.
Offline
Will the images on the TBG's stay the same or are you going to modify it so it can only display images hosted on those websites?
Offline
TorbyFork234 wrote:
Will the images on the TBG's stay the same or are you going to modify it so it can only display images hosted on those websites?
Since images were never disabled there anyway, I don't think this'll affect them as well.
Offline
WOOOOOOOOO
Offline
YESH!
Last edited by fungirl123 (2012-04-13 18:02:22)
Offline
Sweet, but can only scratchers use them. Oh and by the way:
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
Awesome!
Do you think there's going to be any system for requesting websites to be added to this "whitelist" of image websites? For example if you make your own Scratch-related website? Because I see that there are some extras such as modshare.tk, scratchr.org, and scratch.mit.edu, and I don't see why others can't be added if someone has a good enough argument to support their request.
maybe like applying for your website to be approved to link to.
Offline
I would just go WOOYEAWOOOOOOOYAYAYAYAYA, but that's not really adding anything.
I like the whitelist idea! Spammers won't want to use plotobucky or tinnypic because people could flag the pictures and delete their spam. Blocking the other sites and just allowing those ones where the spam would be deleted fast is a wunnerful idea!
Offline
Yay! I can disable Antidote now!
I understand why it is not allowed (can't be flagged easily), but I wish I could use Dropbox for images, it is much easier to drag and drop the file in Explorer than deal with a image hosting site. :3
Offline
Wickimen wrote:
This is awesome, but I don't get it. Imgur was what was used for the attack anyway.
The attack of December 26th? No, that's not correct. The images were taken from a number of shock sites - none of the standard image hosting sites were used.
Offline
Wow, thanks ST!
Offline
Yup seems to be working.
Last edited by funelephant (2012-04-13 21:11:35)
Offline
Paddle2See wrote:
Wickimen wrote:
This is awesome, but I don't get it. Imgur was what was used for the attack anyway.
The attack of December 26th? No, that's not correct. The images were taken from a number of shock sites - none of the standard image hosting sites were used.
Well, after images were disabled, there was a smaller attack using an imgur link
Offline