Have you noticed that in scratchblocks (in the Wiki and main forums), there is this block:
stop all pinksbut not this one?
stop all soundsEDIT: This is not an April Fools' prank, neither by me or the Scratch Team. This has been around since the beginning, and I discovered it over a month ago.
Last edited by 360-International (2012-04-01 14:27:48)
Offline
Oh wow. That's hilarious xD
(To answer the question; no)
Offline
Paddle2See wrote:
Looks more like a Bug report than a suggestion...*hooks up topic towing truck*
If I had more space in my sig I'd put that in there
Offline
Offline
stop all redsIt works!
Last edited by CheeseMunchy (2012-03-31 19:20:33)
Offline
CheeseMunchy wrote:
stop all redsIt works!
lol
XD
stop all purples
Offline
stop all greenshmm... does it work.
stop all pinkstest.
Last edited by joletole (2012-03-31 21:18:34)
Offline
coolhogs wrote:
I was right. It was a april fool's joke
No, it's not. It's been here the whole time.
EDIT: As a matter of fact, I discovered this over a month ago, but it still went in the April Fools' list in the wiki as a prank that was anonymously discovered. So they listed my discovery in the wrong place, and I didn't even get credit for it. Which makes you wonder what a bunch of bumblers the Scratch Team are, especially considering the Neigh Forums, the Text-Based Hunger Games, and the automatic word replacement (especially since speech infringement is illegal).
Last edited by 360-International (2012-04-01 13:48:07)
Offline
360-International wrote:
coolhogs wrote:
I was right. It was a april fool's joke
No, it's not. It's been here the whole time.
EDIT: As a matter of fact, I discovered this over a month ago, but it still went in the April Fools' list in the wiki as a prank that was anonymously discovered. So they listed my discovery in the wrong place, and I didn't even get credit for it. Which makes you wonder what a bunch of bumblers the Scratch Team are, especially considering the Neigh Forums, the Text-Based Hunger Games, and the automatic word replacement (especially since speech infringement is illegal).
Sorry, but I laughed at that. First you call the ST a bunch of bumblers (whatever the heck that is), then you accuse them of breaking the law.
*Facepalm*
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
360-International wrote:
coolhogs wrote:
I was right. It was a april fool's joke
No, it's not. It's been here the whole time.
EDIT: As a matter of fact, I discovered this over a month ago, but it still went in the April Fools' list in the wiki as a prank that was anonymously discovered. So they listed my discovery in the wrong place, and I didn't even get credit for it. Which makes you wonder what a bunch of bumblers the Scratch Team are, especially considering the Neigh Forums, the Text-Based Hunger Games, and the automatic word replacement (especially since speech infringement is illegal).Sorry, but I laughed at that. First you call the ST a bunch of bumblers (whatever the heck that is), then you accuse them of breaking the law.
*Facepalm*
Well, they're a bunch of bumblers, and they're breaking the law, so...
Offline
360-International wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
360-International wrote:
No, it's not. It's been here the whole time.
EDIT: As a matter of fact, I discovered this over a month ago, but it still went in the April Fools' list in the wiki as a prank that was anonymously discovered. So they listed my discovery in the wrong place, and I didn't even get credit for it. Which makes you wonder what a bunch of bumblers the Scratch Team are, especially considering the Neigh Forums, the Text-Based Hunger Games, and the automatic word replacement (especially since speech infringement is illegal).Sorry, but I laughed at that. First you call the ST a bunch of bumblers (whatever the heck that is), then you accuse them of breaking the law.
*Facepalm*Well, they're a bunch of bumblers, and they're breaking the law, so...
Hmm. I'll edit it if I become a Wiki Editor...
It was probably my fault...
Offline
ZapLightning wrote:
360-International wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Sorry, but I laughed at that. First you call the ST a bunch of bumblers (whatever the heck that is), then you accuse them of breaking the law.
*Facepalm*Well, they're a bunch of bumblers, and they're breaking the law, so...
Hmm. I'll edit it if I become a Wiki Editor...
It was probably my fault...
This is coolhogs, by the way...
What a way to mess up Scratch History?
Or is this a april fool's joke?
Offline
ZapLightning wrote:
360-International wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Sorry, but I laughed at that. First you call the ST a bunch of bumblers (whatever the heck that is), then you accuse them of breaking the law.
*Facepalm*Well, they're a bunch of bumblers, and they're breaking the law, so...
Hmm. I'll edit it if I become a Wiki Editor...
It was probably my fault...
Okay. (I actually turned in a request for Wiki contributor immediately when I saw that.) I guess I could've mentioned that I discovered it a long time ago.
Offline
360-International wrote:
ZapLightning wrote:
360-International wrote:
Well, they're a bunch of bumblers, and they're breaking the law, so...Hmm. I'll edit it if I become a Wiki Editor...
It was probably my fault...Okay. (I actually turned in a request for Wiki contributor immediately when I saw that.) I guess I could've mentioned that I discovered it a long time ago.
Attribution of discoveries isn't generally given on the wiki.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
360-International wrote:
ZapLightning wrote:
Hmm. I'll edit it if I become a Wiki Editor...
It was probably my fault...Okay. (I actually turned in a request for Wiki contributor immediately when I saw that.) I guess I could've mentioned that I discovered it a long time ago.
Attribution of discoveries isn't generally given on the wiki.
Huh. That seems weird.
Offline
360-International wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
360-International wrote:
Okay. (I actually turned in a request for Wiki contributor immediately when I saw that.) I guess I could've mentioned that I discovered it a long time ago.Attribution of discoveries isn't generally given on the wiki.
Huh. That seems weird.
Not really, because it's not really important who discovered it.
Offline
ZapLightning wrote:
360-International wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Sorry, but I laughed at that. First you call the ST a bunch of bumblers (whatever the heck that is), then you accuse them of breaking the law.
*Facepalm*Well, they're a bunch of bumblers, and they're breaking the law, so...
Hmm. I'll edit it if I become a Wiki Editor...
It was probably my fault...
Fixed.
Offline