Scratch

Luke121 wrote:

Any game with excessive DLC.

DLC? ._.

kimmy123 wrote:

CylonToast wrote:

Luke121 wrote:

Any game with excessive DLC.

DLC? ._.

Downloadable Content.

That doesn't make it bad, it jsut means theres more to play around with. Unless your talking about WoW where you have to buy and install each little expansion pack.

MasterOfTheGames wrote:

I'm pretty sure Pokemon B&W Versions 2 will be fail since every Pokemon game after Hoeen was a fail anyway...

LOL
Liar
Go play them for once, don't only look at the designs of the pokemon
What they are is just a slightly changed version of the old systems, with new pokemon to catch.
Why would you dislike something that's almost the exact same thing as its predecessors?
If this is about the pokemon designs, then GO LOOK AT MAGNEMITE, LICKITUNG, GRIMER, AND HONESTLY TELL ME THAT THE NEW POKEMON WERE UNORIGINAL.
Every generation has its differences from the others, they're the exact same game with a new, bigger skin on every iteration.

If you hate the new games for how they play, then you should also hate the old ones
they're the exact same game with better graphics and more items/pokemon/music/areas

As proven by the fact that you could perfectly (except for graphics) recreate the original red/blue storyline with the black/white engine


...If it weren't for the new generation games that you call "fail", I'd never have known about pokemon at all.
Be grateful that I knew to check for older ones.

Last edited by pikachu1337 (2012-04-10 13:10:45)

SKYRIM on PS3!

777w wrote:

pikachu1337 wrote:

MasterOfTheGames wrote:

I'm pretty sure Pokemon B&W Versions 2 will be fail since every Pokemon game after Hoeen was a fail anyway...

LOL
Liar
Go play them for once, don't only look at the designs of the pokemon
What they are is just a slightly changed version of the old systems, with new pokemon to catch.
Why would you dislike something that's almost the exact same thing as its predecessors?
If this is about the pokemon designs, then GO LOOK AT MAGNEMITE, LICKITUNG, GRIMER, AND HONESTLY TELL ME THAT THE NEW POKEMON WERE UNORIGINAL.
Every generation has its differences from the others, they're the exact same game with a new, bigger skin on every iteration.

If you hate the new games for how they play, then you should also hate the old ones
they're the exact same game with better graphics and more items/pokemon/music/areas

As proven by the fact that you could perfectly (except for graphics) recreate the original red/blue storyline with the black/white engine


...If it weren't for the new generation games that you call "fail", I'd never have known about pokemon at all.
Be grateful that I knew to check for older ones.

wawawa im confused on what your opinion on pokemon even is becuase of this post
sorry but this is a very confusing post

I like every generation, simply because it is pokemon.
90% of the fanbase sees this as a sin that I should be executed for.

coolboy2009 wrote:

Mass effect 3.

Now, before you start complaining, I will only mention the ending a few times, possibly.

Bioware with EA isn't a great thing for either company. Sure, Mass effect 1 & 2 are great games, but then there are the tragic money grabs like Dragon age 2 and ME3. ME3 was meant to be the best one yet, but instead they watered it down for the 8 year old's who play CoD and make unfunny and sometimes offensive "your mom" jokes and racial slurs.

The "Action" version you can play when you start a new game is the worst idea the series has ever had. Why would an RPG allow you to skip the GOOD parts of the game just to let you catch "America syndrome"? (America Syndrome is when one man manages to kill an entire army. *Cough* CoD *Cough*)

And the Ending.
Now, go ahead and complain about that annoying supernatural 11 year old all you want, but the plot holes made me sick. WHY CAN JOKER LEAVE THE BATTLE WHEN SHEPHERD SAID THERE IS NO TURNING BACK!?!?!

The massive plot holes and other story deficiencies are due to the fact that the original storywriter, who wrote the first's storyline entirely and had help from one other on the second, left the job entirely to writer 2 on ME3.

pikachu1337 wrote:

777w wrote:

pikachu1337 wrote:

LOL
Liar
Go play them for once, don't only look at the designs of the pokemon
What they are is just a slightly changed version of the old systems, with new pokemon to catch.
Why would you dislike something that's almost the exact same thing as its predecessors?
If this is about the pokemon designs, then GO LOOK AT MAGNEMITE, LICKITUNG, GRIMER, AND HONESTLY TELL ME THAT THE NEW POKEMON WERE UNORIGINAL.
Every generation has its differences from the others, they're the exact same game with a new, bigger skin on every iteration.

If you hate the new games for how they play, then you should also hate the old ones
they're the exact same game with better graphics and more items/pokemon/music/areas

As proven by the fact that you could perfectly (except for graphics) recreate the original red/blue storyline with the black/white engine


...If it weren't for the new generation games that you call "fail", I'd never have known about pokemon at all.
Be grateful that I knew to check for older ones.

wawawa im confused on what your opinion on pokemon even is becuase of this post
sorry but this is a very confusing post

I like every generation, simply because it is pokemon.
90% of the fanbase sees this as a sin that I should be executed for.

okee dokee
i dont even particularly care about pokemon anyway
mystery dungeon is half good and the normal games are simply evil

Three words

Call of Duty

That will be all

NeilWest wrote:

Correct, CoD isn't the most cinematic.

Not neccasarily a game, the Wii U will fail. It will have a wallet-emptying cost, due to the HD graphics and the large tablet that come with it and it may miss something that the Wii had, that made it great.

Family appeal. If you look at the Xbox 360 aisle at your local game store, a majority of the games will be for mature games. Then look at the Wii or DS aisles, they are practically full of child-friendly games. See a difference? The reason why the Wii was #1 was because it catered for a unrealised group of gamers, the casual and non-hardcore ones.

Now, the Wii U will have HD graphics, so it will encourage adult games to dominate it's market, leaving the family ones in the dust. This is a very unlikely gamble which could put Nintendo in some serious trouble. And failure.

But don't you remember what nintendo did LAST time they got their hands on a top-of-the-line graphics?
They animated every hair on DK, mario got new fireballs and more realistic jeans, link's clothes actually HAD TEXTURE.
My point is, nintendo isn't going to just abandon these family friendly series(es?) altogether, my thought is that for this thing to be backwards compatible (as they promised), they'll have to either reinvent or allow the use of the old wiimote and nunchuck.
The family friendly games will not cease, but there will be more mature games as well.
Besides, how on earth do HD graphics mean adult games will dominate?  The gamecube had top of the line graphics at its time, did it get more mature games?  No!
(Fun fact, the nintendo gamecube actually has about the same polygon count as the wii does.)

pikachu1337 wrote:

NeilWest wrote:

Correct, CoD isn't the most cinematic.

Not neccasarily a game, the Wii U will fail. It will have a wallet-emptying cost, due to the HD graphics and the large tablet that come with it and it may miss something that the Wii had, that made it great.

Family appeal. If you look at the Xbox 360 aisle at your local game store, a majority of the games will be for mature games. Then look at the Wii or DS aisles, they are practically full of child-friendly games. See a difference? The reason why the Wii was #1 was because it catered for a unrealised group of gamers, the casual and non-hardcore ones.

Now, the Wii U will have HD graphics, so it will encourage adult games to dominate it's market, leaving the family ones in the dust. This is a very unlikely gamble which could put Nintendo in some serious trouble. And failure.

But don't you remember what nintendo did LAST time they got their hands on a top-of-the-line graphics?
They animated every hair on DK, mario got new fireballs and more realistic jeans, link's clothes actually HAD TEXTURE.
My point is, nintendo isn't going to just abandon these family friendly series(es?) altogether, my thought is that for this thing to be backwards compatible (as they promised), they'll have to either reinvent or allow the use of the old wiimote and nunchuck.
The family friendly games will not cease, but there will be more mature games as well.
Besides, how on earth do HD graphics mean adult games will dominate?  The gamecube had top of the line graphics at its time, did it get more mature games?  No!
(Fun fact, the nintendo gamecube actually has about the same polygon count as the wii does.)

But that was 2001-2005, that was when a war game was looked down upon for it's encouraging of violence.

stor wrote:

My top three worst games of all time
1: ET (Atari 2600)
2: Zelda: Faces of Evil (3DO)
3: Bilble Tales (NES)

The Faces Of Evil was CDi. :I

God that was awful of a game, but it made for some epic YouTube poops. XD

CylonToast wrote:

I saw a video game on the Xbox marketplace about a little cartoon guy that wears a fez. I think it was called something like "Fez Adventures".

Zhat's not a fail game, zhat's a cute game. :3

....I need to remember I'm on Scratch and not RPing on Tumblr. xD