Scratch

CheckItNow12 · 2012-07-16 17:11:29

imnotbob wrote:
Angry Birds: "Some very angry chirping. We can be happy it's not translated."

Wow.

Last edited by CheckItNow12 (2012-07-16 17:11:41)

777w · 2012-07-16 17:12:46

CheckItNow12 wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
Angry Birds: "Some very angry chirping. We can be happy it's not translated."

Wow.
http://i810.photobucket.com/albums/zz23 … cepalm.jpg

"to describe the epic fail" sort of ruins the poster

XGamer42 · 2012-07-16 18:23:46

This was Connielove93's review of Scarface:

Good role models for kids smile

Well this story is a family fave in our house!! My four year old and nine year old just love it! And u might b thinking "who lets their kids watch scarface??", but when my kids are making bank dealing and making big bucks while your kid is sitting on the couch asking for more candy, you will know why. These charcters r ppl I want my kids to look up to because they know what it takes to be at the top, and what's a better lesson than that?

*FACEPALM*

ilackoriginality · 2012-07-16 19:02:29

"Some very angry chirping. We can be happy it's not translated."
"Some very angry chirping. We can be happy it's not translated."
"Some very angry chirping. We can be happy it's not translated."
"Some very angry chirping. We can be happy it's not translated."
"Some very angry chirping. We can be happy it's not translated."
"Some very angry chirping. We can be happy it's not translated."

GameHutSoftware · 2012-07-16 19:33:19

imnotbob wrote:
Angry Birds: "Some very angry chirping. We can be happy it's not translated."

Wow.

WILL SOMEBODY PLEASE STEP UP ONTO THE STAGE AND TRANSLATE CHIRPS INTO ENGLISH? qqqq

CheckItNow12 · 2012-07-16 19:52:59

Some parent wrote:
I have since blocked all G rated shows

WUT.

spongebob123 · 2012-07-16 20:47:21

CheckItNow12 wrote:
Some parent wrote:
I have since blocked all G rated shows
WUT.

lol

funelephant · 2012-07-17 07:15:05

CheckItNow12 wrote:
Some parent wrote:
I have since blocked all G rated shows
WUT.

Then what do you...

wiimaster · 2012-07-17 07:29:20

No offence guys, but this thread is fail. You guys are missing the point of the website. Half of the things you guys say that the website says aren't actually on the website as part of the review, and if you ask me, commonsensemedia has better judgement than most of the people on this thread.
Sure, some things are rated a little high, but there is no need to hate. The website isn't forcing you to follow those rules - its not going out of it's way to get its point across, so why are you?

nama · 2012-07-17 12:08:15

wiimaster wrote:
No offence guys, but this thread is fail. You guys are missing the point of the website. Half of the things you guys say that the website says aren't actually on the website as part of the review, and if you ask me, commonsensemedia has better judgement than most of the people on this thread.
Sure, some things are rated a little high, but there is no need to hate. The website isn't forcing you to follow those rules - its not going out of it's way to get its point across, so why are you?

For teh luls. no seriously i think thats why

agscratcher · 2012-07-17 12:50:05

wiimaster wrote:
its not going out of it's way to get its point across, so why are you?

If you don't know the answer to that question, you're missing the whole point of the Internet.

CheckItNow12 · 2012-07-17 13:51:03

agscratcher wrote:
wiimaster wrote:
its not going out of it's way to get its point across, so why are you?
If you don't know the answer to that question, you're missing the whole point of the Internet.

CheckItNow12 · 2012-07-17 13:57:34

wiimaster wrote:
No offence guys, but this thread is fail. You guys are missing the point of the website. Half of the things you guys say that the website says aren't actually on the website as part of the review, and if you ask me, commonsensemedia has better judgement than most of the people on this thread.
Sure, some things are rated a little high, but there is no need to hate. The website isn't forcing you to follow those rules - its not going out of it's way to get its point across, so why are you?

Those things ARE on the website. You just need to look around.

wiimaster · 2012-07-17 14:08:11

agscratcher wrote:
wiimaster wrote:
its not going out of it's way to get its point across, so why are you?
If you don't know the answer to that question, you're missing the whole point of the Internet.

The 'point' of the internet is to share information across the world. I don't really get what that has to do with my question hmm

CheckItNow12 wrote:
wiimaster wrote:
No offence guys, but this thread is fail. You guys are missing the point of the website. Half of the things you guys say that the website says aren't actually on the website as part of the review, and if you ask me, commonsensemedia has better judgement than most of the people on this thread.
Sure, some things are rated a little high, but there is no need to hate. The website isn't forcing you to follow those rules - its not going out of it's way to get its point across, so why are you?
Those things ARE on the website. You just need to look around.

I never said they weren't on the website.

Anyways, I made my point, I don't really want to argue, so don't expect me to reply anymore tongue

pikachu1337 · 2012-07-17 14:29:35

wiimaster wrote:
I don't really want to argue

Why are you on the internet then?
The internet is battle royale with opinions, but with an infinite number of people and no rules!
If you were opposed to fighting, you should have put some thought into the decision to express opinions at all.

GameHutSoftware · 2012-07-17 14:39:22

On the Google Earth app, some kid posted four identical reviews:

some ^%$%$# kid, FOUR TIMES wrote:
good techknology!

And another on the same app:

REALLY overprotective parent, or something wrote:
google is not for kids, and csm is the worst.
confirm that ur 16+.

jslomba · 2012-07-17 15:08:01

GameHutSoftware wrote:
And another on the same app:
REALLY overprotective parent, or something wrote:
google is not for kids, and csm is the worst.
confirm that ur 16+.

I'm pretty sure that's a troll

CheckItNow12 · 2012-07-17 15:24:15

GameHutSoftware wrote:
On the Google Earth app, some kid posted four identical reviews:
some ^%$%$# kid, FOUR TIMES wrote:
good techknology!
He's probably young and doesn't know how to spell. Not sure about the 4 times thing, though.
And another on the same app:
REALLY overprotective parent, or something wrote:
google is not for kids, and csm is the worst.
confirm that ur 16+.

Eh, Yahoo is more safer tongue

But seriously, GOOGLE? Inappropriate?

Well, I guess it is, depending on what you search. But HOW, and I mean HOW is the app inappropriate.

*Obvious troll is obvious*

Last edited by CheckItNow12 (2012-07-17 15:25:05)

imnotbob · 2012-07-17 15:33:53

FunDude wrote:
CheckItNow12 wrote:
The parent who did the Negative MLP:FIM review, here's what I found.

Some (horribly overprotective) parent from CSM wrote:
]They use horrible words like "h*peless" and "d*mb". I don't want my 13-year-old getting ideas from them. He once saw it around a friend's house, and when he came back, he said that he wants to watch this filth, and that all other shows are "st*pid"! How awful! This show has awful language.
How. And I mean HOW, is hopeless A BAD WORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-_-

Also, in Regular show, some parent said it was rated TV-14 for 5 episodes, aired (once) on Adult Swim, and earned a TV-MA (Mature Audience) Rating. WHAT.

EDIT: Just found another review, that says they say the F word, the N word.

-_- There is an ABSOLUTE 0% that parent has watched the show.
they said f$#@er in Latin, P^$$ed, and c%@p.

*Bangs head on desk till skull cracks open*

berberberber · 2012-07-17 16:01:01

Those reviews make me want to throw my computer out the window! Argh!!

spongebob123 · 2012-07-17 21:05:08

spongebob123 wrote:
http://www.redbox.com/movies/the-advent … hris-fable

-____________________________________________________________________-

This isn't Commonsense Media, but the movie...Just...Ughfhufuhgh...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Santa … nquers.JPG

Speaking about bad movies...

CheckItNow12 · 2012-07-18 12:08:15

Ok, here's a part of a review of Dora I found:

A parent wrote:
Almost all my children, excluding my 2 and 5 year olds (the show is a bit scary at parts, I'll let them start watching when they turn eight), watch this great show! Dora is a great role mo...

I thought Dora was aimed for toddlers, not 8 year olds. hmm

berberberber · 2012-07-18 12:51:30

A parent wrote:
Almost all my children, excluding my 2 and 5 year olds (the show is a bit scary at parts, I'll let them start watching when they turn eight), watch this great show! Dora is a great role mo...

CheckItNow12 · 2012-07-18 19:40:26

berberberber wrote:
A parent wrote:
Almost all my children, excluding my 2 and 5 year olds (the show is a bit scary at parts, I'll let them start watching when they turn eight), watch this great show! Dora is a great role mo...
http://i.imgur.com/1Npae.png

lolwut.

weegeeissparta · 2012-07-18 23:04:57

A typical day at the park:

Oh hi bob!
Hi Jake!
(farts)
HEY! THAT'S INAPPROPRIATE! THERE ARE KIDS IN THIS PARK YOU KNOW!

And that is why that site is evil.

Appearantly they have commercials now.

Scratch

archived forums

#176 2012-07-16 17:11:29

Re: oh man

imnotbob wrote:

#177 2012-07-16 17:12:46

Re: oh man

CheckItNow12 wrote:

imnotbob wrote:

#178 2012-07-16 18:23:46

Re: oh man

#179 2012-07-16 19:02:29

Re: oh man

#180 2012-07-16 19:33:19

Re: oh man

imnotbob wrote:

#181 2012-07-16 19:52:59

Re: oh man

Some parent wrote:

#182 2012-07-16 20:47:21

Re: oh man

CheckItNow12 wrote:

Some parent wrote:

#183 2012-07-17 07:15:05

Re: oh man

CheckItNow12 wrote:

Some parent wrote:

#184 2012-07-17 07:29:20

Re: oh man

#185 2012-07-17 12:08:15

Re: oh man

wiimaster wrote:

#186 2012-07-17 12:50:05

Re: oh man

wiimaster wrote:

#187 2012-07-17 13:51:03

Re: oh man

agscratcher wrote:

wiimaster wrote:

#188 2012-07-17 13:57:34

Re: oh man

wiimaster wrote:

#189 2012-07-17 14:08:11

Re: oh man

agscratcher wrote:

wiimaster wrote:

CheckItNow12 wrote:

wiimaster wrote:

#190 2012-07-17 14:29:35

Re: oh man

wiimaster wrote:

#191 2012-07-17 14:39:22

Re: oh man

some ^%$%$# kid, FOUR TIMES wrote:

REALLY overprotective parent, or something wrote:

#192 2012-07-17 15:08:01

Re: oh man

GameHutSoftware wrote:

REALLY overprotective parent, or something wrote:

#193 2012-07-17 15:24:15

Re: oh man

GameHutSoftware wrote:

some ^%$%$# kid, FOUR TIMES wrote:

REALLY overprotective parent, or something wrote:

#194 2012-07-17 15:33:53

Re: oh man

FunDude wrote:

CheckItNow12 wrote:

Some (horribly overprotective) parent from CSM wrote:

#195 2012-07-17 16:01:01

Re: oh man

#196 2012-07-17 21:05:08

Re: oh man

spongebob123 wrote:

#197 2012-07-18 12:08:15

Re: oh man

A parent wrote:

#198 2012-07-18 12:51:30

Re: oh man

A parent wrote: