Scratch

I'l help. As well as the above I have PHP an CSS knowledge.

poemon1 wrote:

logiblocs wrote:

I'l help. As well as the above I have PHP an CSS knowledge.

ok 

I need a javascript script-images that follow your mouse pointer, like on www.coolmath-games.com

nothing follows my mouse on that link

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

poemon1 wrote:

ok 

I need a javascript script-images that follow your mouse pointer, like on www.coolmath-games.com

nothing follows my mouse on that link

Update your browser :3

EDIT: nothing follows mine either 

Could be cuz I'm on a mac and I haven't visited that site since I switched to mac from pc 
]
Could try firefox as well.

veggieman001 wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

nothing follows my mouse on that link

Update your browser :3

nothing on firefox either

and i use chromium man :I
more updated than your browser

Chrome man. Faster than yours.

veggieman001 wrote:

looool

chromium is the development version of chrome
right now chrome is on version 17
chromium's on 19
it's quite a bit faster, especially with some v8 and webkit optimisation that has been done since the release of chrome 17
and google can't track you
sound like pluses to me
along with the extra features and different layouts

Ahem.

Believe me. I have tried Chromium and it was slower. I did a bit of research and it turns out that since this is the development version, there is less aggressing script trimming etc. to keep it fast.

veggieman001 wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

looool

chromium is the development version of chrome
right now chrome is on version 17
chromium's on 19
it's quite a bit faster, especially with some v8 and webkit optimisation that has been done since the release of chrome 17
and google can't track you
sound like pluses to me
along with the extra features and different layouts

Ahem.

Believe me. I have tried Chromium and it was slower. I did a bit of research and it turns out that since this is the development version, there is less aggressing script trimming etc. to keep it fast.

Mmm... it depends on what you're doing. HTML5 elements are a lot faster (like video) with Chromium. Usually there's no performance-wise difference between the two unless you modify the flags though.
And speed isn't everything 

Well you know how there is a browser for everyone.
It all depends on priorities.

And my main priority is speed.

Which is the reason I am stuck with Chrome. After Chrome, everything feels like it's sending things through snail mail 

I will try the new versions of Chromium though 

veggieman001 wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

Mmm... it depends on what you're doing. HTML5 elements are a lot faster (like video) with Chromium. Usually there's no performance-wise difference between the two unless you modify the flags though.
And speed isn't everything 

Well you know how there is a browser for everyone.
It all depends on priorities.

And my main priority is speed.

Which is the reason I am stuck with Chrome. After Chrome, everything feels like it's sending things through snail mail 

I will try the new versions of Chromium though 

I don't like the fact that Google can see whatever you're doing all the time with Chrome.

Neither do I.

I'm a big fan of open source you know.

scimonster wrote:

I have enough websites on my plate right now, but I'll recommend 000webhost.com to you. 

000webhost is a relatively good and fast one.

Ecliptic wrote:

No thanks I'm already working on a site myself.

trinary wrote:

scimonster wrote:

I have enough websites on my plate right now, but I'll recommend 000webhost to you. 

000webhost is a relatively good and fast one.

I like Zymic. 

I like Zymic too 

Anyway, the main reason I'm posting is so I can set new posts on this from my "profile".  I have experience with JavaScript and HTML and PHP (to a lesser extent), so I might try to help if you guys need something.  No promises though (busy x( ).

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

Neither do I.

I'm a big fan of open source you know.

Owning a Mac and liking Apple and being a fan of open source are kind of really contradictory

Less contradictory and owning a pc and liking microsoft windows and being a fan of open source :3

You'd be surprised how many Apple projects are open source.

Plus OSX is Unix based 

I wouldn't be surprised because I know what Apple projects are open source: Darwin and WebKit, among others.

They're extremely proprietary and limiting.

And the only thing I like about Windows is their executable and program file system and they're much less limiting than Macs. I'm a fan of open source and I own a PC where I dual boot Windows and Linux. You own a PC too; Macs are PCs. Which makes their commercials especially hilarious, considering they're making fun of themselves. 

And no, OSX isn't. It's based on OpenStep and NeXTSTEP, which are Unix-like but not Unix. It's like the difference between Windows and ReactOS.

Check and mate :3

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

Less contradictory and owning a pc and liking microsoft windows and being a fan of open source :3

You'd be surprised how many Apple projects are open source.

Plus OSX is Unix based 

I wouldn't be surprised because I know what Apple projects are open source: Darwin and WebKit, among others.

They're extremely proprietary and limiting.

And the only thing I like about Windows is their executable and program file system and they're much less limiting than Macs. I'm a fan of open source and I own a PC where I dual boot Windows and Linux. You own a PC too; Macs are PCs. Which makes their commercials especially hilarious, considering they're making fun of themselves. 

And no, OSX isn't. It's based on OpenStep and NeXTSTEP, which are Unix-like but not Unix. It's like the difference between Windows and ReactOS.

Check and mate :3

You forgot Xcode and a few others 

Windows = fail + beurocratic + everything else commercial

Apple = cool + fun + open + creativity

And that is true, but the custom of calling Windows based computers PCs came from the origianl IBM PC    Harakou told me that (thanks harakou!)

Who cares, it's Unix based according to Wikipedia. And that's better than registry based 

That's why I said "among others". I didn't feel like listing them all.

Uhh... Windows is definitely a lot more open and about as commercial as OS X. On Windows you can kind of choose what devices you use it on and how to use it; OS X is only for certain machines. And the OS in itself isn't creative. It's the person, not even the software. And OS X doesn't have MS Paint, the holy god of all things.

And yes, but just because it's customary doesn't mean it's totally correct.

Also, there's nothing wrong with the way Windows is set up. Registry-based isn't even bad... it's a lot cleaner than the way *nix systems do it with files inside /etc, which is similar to what Windows used to do. OS X also scatters property list files which in effect do the same thing. So that's not even a valid argument. 

Oh and you're doing the silly thing that anyone who argues with me about operating systems does: comparing an OS (Windows) with a company (Apple) 

Last edited by veggieman001 (2012-03-05 20:19:41)

jji7skyline wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

jji7skyline wrote:

You forgot Xcode and a few others 

Windows = fail + beurocratic + everything else commercial

Apple = cool + fun + open + creativity

And that is true, but the custom of calling Windows based computers PCs came from the origianl IBM PC    Harakou told me that (thanks harakou!)

Who cares, it's Unix based according to Wikipedia. And that's better than registry based 

That's why I said "among others". I didn't feel like listing them all.

Uhh... Windows is definitely a lot more open and about as commercial as OS X. On Windows you can kind of choose what devices you use it on and how to use it; OS X is only for certain machines. And the OS in itself isn't creative. It's the person, not even the software. And OS X doesn't have MS Paint, the holy god of all things.

And yes, but just because it's customary doesn't mean it's totally correct.

Also, there's nothing wrong with the way Windows is set up. Registry-based isn't even bad... it's a lot cleaner than the way *nix systems do it with files inside /etc, which is similar to what Windows used to do. OS X also scatters property list files which in effect do the same thing. So that's not even a valid argument. 

Oh and you're doing the silly thing that anyone who argues with me about operating systems does: comparing an OS (Windows) with a company (Apple) 

Uh ok.

Wrong. There has been a lot of media criticism on how closed the iOS platform is, but the OSX system is very open.

MS Paint is the worst program ever made. Limiting which machines OSX can be installed on keeps it cool. Hackintosh for those who do not want to use a Apple computer.

Who cares.

OS X is not very open. Sure, it's possible to get into certain files, but they make it pretty difficult (as in any sort of file that begins with . which makes it difficult to access .htaccess files for web programming [and is one reason why nobody uses OS X for servers]). It is possible to add any program though.

MS Paint is an excellent piece of software. Do you have any rationale for why you hate it? I see that OS X doesn't come with any sort of drawing program preinstalled, especially not a good pixel art editor.

How does that "keep it cool"? It just makes it more proprietary and closed. You have to break your agreement with Apple to put it on another system.