I think the Panther method of cloning is simpler, but we're getting offtopic here.
The Wiki is getting hungry for more screenshots. XD So am I!
Offline
scimonster wrote:
I think the Panther method of cloning is simpler, but we're getting offtopic here.
The Wiki is getting hungry for more screenshots. XD So am I!
actually, we are not. to be honest. (getting off topic i mean)
Offline
Ashurathehedgehog wrote:
scimonster wrote:
I think the Panther method of cloning is simpler, but we're getting offtopic here.
The Wiki is getting hungry for more screenshots. XD So am I!actually, we are not. to be honest. (getting off topic i mean)
what's your opinion then: panther or BYOB 3?
Offline
Borrego6165 wrote:
Ashurathehedgehog wrote:
scimonster wrote:
I think the Panther method of cloning is simpler, but we're getting offtopic here.
The Wiki is getting hungry for more screenshots. XD So am I!actually, we are not. to be honest. (getting off topic i mean)
what's your opinion then: panther or BYOB 3?
Honestly? never tried either.
Offline
Ashurathehedgehog wrote:
Borrego6165 wrote:
Ashurathehedgehog wrote:
actually, we are not. to be honest. (getting off topic i mean)what's your opinion then: panther or BYOB 3?
Honestly? never tried either.
Er, offtopic here, but why do you thank me in your sig?
Offline
I recommend you change the graphics for the views/love-its/etc. section, it looks pretty bad to me. The rest looks amazing though. I think backpack is a nice, friendly-feeling name for that feature.
Offline
how about like facebook where:
+you can like comments
+have a special "thanks" button, instead of getting the message "you've posted a similar message recently"
Offline
Liru wrote:
Ashurathehedgehog wrote:
Borrego6165 wrote:
what's your opinion then: panther or BYOB 3?Honestly? never tried either.
Er, offtopic here, but why do you thank me in your sig?
Because of you my 100th fourm was NOT here but you helped me get it. *back on topic nao.*
Offline
I wrote this on the comments, but thought it would be good to put in the thread, too.
I wrote:
Hmmm... The screenshot has a grey "say" block. I hope that's just a beta quirk.
"See inside" sounds kind of weird, too. How about just "Open in editor"?
The remixes/related boxes look funky when empty. How about a remix box that only shows if there are remixes?
--scratchisthebest
Edit: Sorry, I have to.
shiguy101 wrote:
how big is the backpack?
A MILLION CUBIC MILES
Last edited by scratchisthebest (2012-02-27 16:05:33)
Offline
Borrego6165 wrote:
Ashurathehedgehog wrote:
scimonster wrote:
I think the Panther method of cloning is simpler, but we're getting offtopic here.
The Wiki is getting hungry for more screenshots. XD So am I!actually, we are not. to be honest. (getting off topic i mean)
what's your opinion then: panther or BYOB 3?
Panther.
Offline
One question from a new user: Does the new Scratch will require a web connection when we work on it? Because many peole like me cant use IE connection 12 months in a year.
Anyway this project seems to be very good.
Offline
RacerBG wrote:
One question from a new user: Does the new Scratch will require a web connection when we work on it? Because many peole like me cant use IE connection 12 months in a year.
Anyway this project seems to be very good.
No; there will be a downloadable offline version of the project editor.
Offline
RacerBG wrote:
One question from a new user: Does the new Scratch will require a web connection when we work on it? Because many peole like me cant use IE connection 12 months in a year.
Anyway this project seems to be very good.
???
Offline
I think that it definently should be "clipboard". I think that scratch should dispense of as much cutsey bubbles and frills as possible. Scratch is supposed to prepare kids for programming, and the look of 1.4 is perfect, IMO. Because you need to balance the ease of use with the level of proffesionality.
I also think there should be a preferences menu where you can switch to the look of 1.4 while still using the new blocks and the online and all that.
Offline
Hey Guys!
I've come up with a user-interface design that incorporates the "backpack" idea with another I had, while reducing the space used in the project editor, and keeping with a general layout that is not too different from old Scratch.
View it here: http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.png
The new additions and changes are in green.
I hope the Scratch team will consider this layout. The project editor shown in this thread seems overly kiddish in my opinion, and will only be tedious to use for older Scratchers.
Who likes my design? http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.png
EDIT:
after reading this whole thread, I feel safe to say what I really think
in a constructive sort of friendly way, your design is UGLY
Last edited by illusionist (2012-03-02 21:47:36)
Offline
I like the 1.4 interface the best, TBH.
Offline
illusionist wrote:
Hey Guys!
I've come up with a user-interface design that incorporates the "backpack" idea with another I had, while reducing the space used in the project editor, and keeping with a general layout that is not too different from old Scratch.
View it here: http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.png
The new additions and changes are in green.
I hope the Scratch team will consider this layout. The project editor shown in this thread seems overly kiddish in my opinion, and will only be tedious to use for older Scratchers.
Who likes my design? http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.png
Nice! I'm not sure about the idea of increasing the stage size though--what about projects from 1.4 and earlier? How would those work?
Offline
illusionist wrote:
Hey Guys!
I've come up with a user-interface design that incorporates the "backpack" idea with another I had, while reducing the space used in the project editor, and keeping with a general layout that is not too different from old Scratch.
View it here: http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.png
The new additions and changes are in green.
I hope the Scratch team will consider this layout. The project editor shown in this thread seems overly kiddish in my opinion, and will only be tedious to use for older Scratchers.
Who likes my design? http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.png
EDIT:
after reading this whole thread, I feel safe to say what I really think
in a constructive sort of friendly way, your design is UGLY
Yes. Illusionist has the right idea with his wonderful design.
Offline
Greenatic wrote:
illusionist wrote:
Hey Guys!
I've come up with a user-interface design that incorporates the "backpack" idea with another I had, while reducing the space used in the project editor, and keeping with a general layout that is not too different from old Scratch.
View it here: http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.png
The new additions and changes are in green.
I hope the Scratch team will consider this layout. The project editor shown in this thread seems overly kiddish in my opinion, and will only be tedious to use for older Scratchers.
Who likes my design? http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.pngNice! I'm not sure about the idea of increasing the stage size though--what about projects from 1.4 and earlier? How would those work?
When you open them, the script-area and sprite-area expand so that the stage is 480x360 again.
ALSO
To get a feel of how this would feel, open the picture: http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.png and put your browser in full screen.
Last edited by illusionist (2012-03-03 09:42:48)
Offline
illusionist wrote:
Greenatic wrote:
illusionist wrote:
Hey Guys!
I've come up with a user-interface design that incorporates the "backpack" idea with another I had, while reducing the space used in the project editor, and keeping with a general layout that is not too different from old Scratch.
View it here: http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.png
The new additions and changes are in green.
I hope the Scratch team will consider this layout. The project editor shown in this thread seems overly kiddish in my opinion, and will only be tedious to use for older Scratchers.
Who likes my design? http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.pngNice! I'm not sure about the idea of increasing the stage size though--what about projects from 1.4 and earlier? How would those work?
When you open them, the script-area and sprite-area expand so that the stage is 480x360 again.
ALSO
To get a feel of how this would feel, open the picture: http://i.imgur.com/xVIaZ.png and put your browser in full screen.
Pretty nice setup! (:
Last edited by CheeseMunchy (2012-03-03 11:11:35)
Offline
I'm making it into something that looks like a real mockup!
Its only half finished, I will add the rest of the buttons later, but it really brings the design to life.
> > > Click Here! View it in full screen for full effect! < < <
Offline
illusionist wrote:
I'm making it into something that looks like a real mockup!
Its only half finished, I will add the rest of the buttons later, but it really brings the design to life.
> > > Click Here! View it in full screen for full effect! < < <
Sweet, I like it so far! It's the software, not the online editor, correct?
Offline
It seems to me like the current alpha design "flipped" the layout just for the sake of flipping it...
I added more details to my design: > > click here < <
I'll have it finished tomorrow probably.
Last edited by illusionist (2012-03-03 16:04:58)
Offline
illusionist wrote:
It seems to me like the current alpha design "flipped" the layout just for the sake of flipping it...
I added more details to my design: > > click here < <
I'll have it finished tomorrow probably.
Actually quite good!
Offline
I have created a thread on the topic: http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=91444
Offline