Uh, this is turning into Wurm.
Killing someone and taking over their land is 10% of the fight, the rest of it is over the forums.
Offline
my-chemical-romance wrote:
Uh, this is turning into Wurm.
Killing someone and taking over their land is 10% of the fight, the rest of it is over the forums.
Lol, I just thought, we may be talking about different battles, I'm talking about this:
Earthboundjeff wrote:
I suggest Rabbit and Qaz be banned.
Reasons: They attacked us unprovoked for no reason at all, we were ALLIES and they teleported in and raided the place. Theres a difference between trickery, and JUST PLAIN DIRTY. It really was not fair.
Offline
slinger wrote:
my-chemical-romance wrote:
Uh, this is turning into Wurm.
Killing someone and taking over their land is 10% of the fight, the rest of it is over the forums.Lol, I just thought, we may be talking about different battles, I'm talking about this:
Earthboundjeff wrote:
I suggest Rabbit and Qaz be banned.
Reasons: They attacked us unprovoked for no reason at all, we were ALLIES and they teleported in and raided the place. Theres a difference between trickery, and JUST PLAIN DIRTY. It really was not fair.
Skittles already replied to this, what we did was completely inside the rules. However, what you're doing, complaining about being raided, is NOT allowed.
Offline
The-Whiz wrote:
slinger wrote:
my-chemical-romance wrote:
Uh, this is turning into Wurm.
Killing someone and taking over their land is 10% of the fight, the rest of it is over the forums.Lol, I just thought, we may be talking about different battles, I'm talking about this:
Earthboundjeff wrote:
I suggest Rabbit and Qaz be banned.
Reasons: They attacked us unprovoked for no reason at all, we were ALLIES and they teleported in and raided the place. Theres a difference between trickery, and JUST PLAIN DIRTY. It really was not fair.Skittles already replied to this, what we did was completely inside the rules. However, what you're doing, complaining about being raided, is NOT allowed.
Um ok whatever *cought*likeyoudidn'tdoit*cough*
Offline
slinger wrote:
my-chemical-romance wrote:
slinger wrote:
Um... There was absolutely no cause for the attack. I would consider what happened extremely noobish. It's exactly what the wanderers did to us. We where complaining. Then like 12 hours later we do the exact same thing.
Well, we're not going to sit around while they're killing us with our own straps and using all of our stuff against us and we will say "You may kill us, but we have the moral advantage here!".
Did you even read what I wrote? They attacked someone for no reason at all. They where allies. Now maybe you would do that but you NEVER would normally do that unless you where crazy. Attacking someone you are allied to is not smart, it's like asking them to attack you.
Yes I know this is a PvP server, if also has faction BTW whats the point of an alliance you won't keep? I consider people nOObs if they don't keep one they made.
The "point" of a false alliance is so you know where everything is and stuff, so then you get all the good stuff, then take out everyone. Alliances in games will always be like that, unless you have a really strong connection with an ally and are certain they're not going to attack you. And it is "asking them to attack you", but if you've sat back and hoarded everything, and you're fairly sure you can take them, then you want to attack them.
If you're on the "low end" of the deal (
) and you get slaughtered by a supposed ally, then maybe you shouldn't be jumping headfirst into these alliances without first considering if these guys are going to backstab you or not.
TL;DR: Pick your allies wisely. Don't whine if you jump headfirst into an alliance deal, and then you get wrecked later.
Offline
meowmeow55 wrote:
slinger wrote:
my-chemical-romance wrote:
Well, we're not going to sit around while they're killing us with our own straps and using all of our stuff against us and we will say "You may kill us, but we have the moral advantage here!".Did you even read what I wrote? They attacked someone for no reason at all. They where allies. Now maybe you would do that but you NEVER would normally do that unless you where crazy. Attacking someone you are allied to is not smart, it's like asking them to attack you.
Yes I know this is a PvP server, if also has faction BTW whats the point of an alliance you won't keep? I consider people nOObs if they don't keep one they made.The "point" of a false alliance is so you know where everything is and stuff, so then you get all the good stuff, then take out everyone. Alliances in games will always be like that, unless you have a really strong connection with an ally and are certain they're not going to attack you. And it is "asking them to attack you", but if you've sat back and hoarded everything, and you're fairly sure you can take them, then you want to attack them.
If you're on the "low end" of the deal () and you get slaughtered by a supposed ally, then maybe you shouldn't be jumping headfirst into these alliances without first considering if these guys are going to backstab you or not.
TL;DR: Pick your allies wisely. Don't whine if you jump headfirst into an alliance deal, and then you get wrecked later.
It appears that peoples idea of alliance is different than mine Xp
Offline
slinger wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
slinger wrote:
Did you even read what I wrote? They attacked someone for no reason at all. They where allies. Now maybe you would do that but you NEVER would normally do that unless you where crazy. Attacking someone you are allied to is not smart, it's like asking them to attack you.
Yes I know this is a PvP server, if also has faction BTW whats the point of an alliance you won't keep? I consider people nOObs if they don't keep one they made.The "point" of a false alliance is so you know where everything is and stuff, so then you get all the good stuff, then take out everyone. Alliances in games will always be like that, unless you have a really strong connection with an ally and are certain they're not going to attack you. And it is "asking them to attack you", but if you've sat back and hoarded everything, and you're fairly sure you can take them, then you want to attack them.
If you're on the "low end" of the deal () and you get slaughtered by a supposed ally, then maybe you shouldn't be jumping headfirst into these alliances without first considering if these guys are going to backstab you or not.
TL;DR: Pick your allies wisely. Don't whine if you jump headfirst into an alliance deal, and then you get wrecked later.It appears that peoples idea of alliance is different than mine Xp
By the way Sling, we attacked their base but then realised that it was probably a bad idea, so we stopped, repaired any damage and returned their stuff. All of it.
Offline
werdna123 wrote:
slinger wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
The "point" of a false alliance is so you know where everything is and stuff, so then you get all the good stuff, then take out everyone. Alliances in games will always be like that, unless you have a really strong connection with an ally and are certain they're not going to attack you. And it is "asking them to attack you", but if you've sat back and hoarded everything, and you're fairly sure you can take them, then you want to attack them.
If you're on the "low end" of the deal () and you get slaughtered by a supposed ally, then maybe you shouldn't be jumping headfirst into these alliances without first considering if these guys are going to backstab you or not.
TL;DR: Pick your allies wisely. Don't whine if you jump headfirst into an alliance deal, and then you get wrecked later.It appears that peoples idea of alliance is different than mine Xp
By the way Sling, we attacked their base but then realised that it was probably a bad idea, so we stopped, repaired any damage and returned their stuff. All of it.
No you didn't...
Offline
laptop97 wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
slinger wrote:
It appears that peoples idea of alliance is different than mine XpBy the way Sling, we attacked their base but then realised that it was probably a bad idea, so we stopped, repaired any damage and returned their stuff. All of it.
No you didn't...
You took everything and claimed all the land. Now we have no /home. And you never returned a thing.
Also, I propose Ninjas and Assassins merge. Because together we have like 8 members which is enough to compete with oranges and wanderers.
Offline
Earthboundjeff wrote:
laptop97 wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
By the way Sling, we attacked their base but then realised that it was probably a bad idea, so we stopped, repaired any damage and returned their stuff. All of it.No you didn't...
You took everything and claimed all the land. Now we have no /home. And you never returned a thing.
Also, I propose Ninjas and Assassins merge. Because together we have like 8 members which is enough to compete with oranges and wanderers.
you're PXDX?
Offline
brettman98 wrote:
Earthboundjeff wrote:
laptop97 wrote:
No you didn't...You took everything and claimed all the land. Now we have no /home. And you never returned a thing.
Also, I propose Ninjas and Assassins merge. Because together we have like 8 members which is enough to compete with oranges and wanderers.you're PXDX?
Yes she is, who are you?
Offline
Freakish wrote:
brettman98 wrote:
Earthboundjeff wrote:
You took everything and claimed all the land. Now we have no /home. And you never returned a thing.
Also, I propose Ninjas and Assassins merge. Because together we have like 8 members which is enough to compete with oranges and wanderers.you're PXDX?
Yes she is, who are you?
schnikes :]
Offline
Oh here's that video proof I promised of ShadowAce flight-hacking:
http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/ … ;feature=*
Unfortunately I was forced to install Zombe's to get that footage, but it's removed now.
Offline
Earthboundjeff wrote:
laptop97 wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
By the way Sling, we attacked their base but then realised that it was probably a bad idea, so we stopped, repaired any damage and returned their stuff. All of it.No you didn't...
You took everything and claimed all the land. Now we have no /home. And you never returned a thing.
Also, I propose Ninjas and Assassins merge. Because together we have like 8 members which is enough to compete with oranges and wanderers.
So, because everyone else has more people than you, you plan to have more people than everyone else? I have no problem with it, but by doing so you are a hypocrite and your arguments above are invalid.
Offline
The-Whiz wrote:
Oh here's that video proof I promised of ShadowAce flight-hacking:
http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/ … ;feature=*
Unfortunately I was forced to install Zombe's to get that footage, but it's removed now.
You're Qaz?
lol. umad bro
and i see no flight hacking, numbers and times plz
Offline
The-Whiz wrote:
Unfortunately I was forced to install Zombe's to get that footage, but it's removed now.
Haha, you just showed yourself hacking.
And before you say that was to get the footage, you still don't have the right to fly.
Offline
Where the Oranges raided by the Wanderers or what?
Offline
I've Wurmed up the PvP a bit, we have a base pretty far away with 2 stacks of iron ingot which will be used to gear up fighters.
Offline
werdna123 wrote:
slinger wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
The "point" of a false alliance is so you know where everything is and stuff, so then you get all the good stuff, then take out everyone. Alliances in games will always be like that, unless you have a really strong connection with an ally and are certain they're not going to attack you. And it is "asking them to attack you", but if you've sat back and hoarded everything, and you're fairly sure you can take them, then you want to attack them.
If you're on the "low end" of the deal () and you get slaughtered by a supposed ally, then maybe you shouldn't be jumping headfirst into these alliances without first considering if these guys are going to backstab you or not.
TL;DR: Pick your allies wisely. Don't whine if you jump headfirst into an alliance deal, and then you get wrecked later.It appears that peoples idea of alliance is different than mine Xp
By the way Sling, we attacked their base but then realised that it was probably a bad idea, so we stopped, repaired any damage and returned their stuff. All of it.
Dude, I don't care anymore. I'm the idiot it's a PvP server xD
Offline
werdna123 wrote:
Where the Oranges raided by the Wanderers or what?
Yes sir, we got everything EXCEPT the diamonds q_q
Offline