This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#176 2012-08-17 00:48:00

berberberber
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-03-08
Posts: 1000+

Re: Theoretical Physics

Antimatter/matter I believe cancel each other each other out, and are converted to pure energy.


http://i47.tinypic.com/2iaa73k.png

Offline

 

#177 2012-08-17 10:32:17

Firedrake969
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-11-24
Posts: 1000+

Re: Theoretical Physics

berberberber wrote:

Antimatter/matter I believe cancel each other each other out, and are converted to pure energy.

It isn't a theory, it's been proven.  Did you know at the big bang, the ratio of protons to antiprotons was a billion and one to a billion.  Which made a LOT of energy.


Click the sign.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/eterna/eterna2/logo2.png

Offline

 

#178 2012-08-17 10:35:55

Firedrake969
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-11-24
Posts: 1000+

Re: Theoretical Physics

MoreGamesNow wrote:

I'm going to take the "fabric of space" analogy too far here:

Gravity causes depressions in the "fabric"; looking on the other side of the "fabric" (parallel universe?) these would be viewed as "lumps"; they wold repulse things on the opposite side of space time.  Conversely, massive objects on the "other" side (the underside/not our side) would create "lumps" on our side, resulting in "dark energy".  Conclusion: dark energy is the gravity of a parallel universe.

@ = something massive (star maybe?)
----- = fabric of space/time

----------_@_----------

From this side, the "valley" caused by the star appears to be a "mountain", repelling all objects away from it.

Of course, this theory only provides for two universes.  Perhaps the gravity in every universe is felt as dark energy in every universe (besides itself).

Which, seeing as black holes go on indefinitely,
------\/------- (bad drawing...), the opposite would be a white hole.  It would be like a funnel though, more things get taken in than expelled.  This seems like Hawking Radiation to me.... now onto my FAVORITE subject:  String theory.  Can we switch to that?


Click the sign.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/eterna/eterna2/logo2.png

Offline

 

#179 2012-08-17 21:57:56

wolvesstar97
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-08-31
Posts: 1000+

Re: Theoretical Physics

Firedrake969 wrote:

MoreGamesNow wrote:

I'm going to take the "fabric of space" analogy too far here:

Gravity causes depressions in the "fabric"; looking on the other side of the "fabric" (parallel universe?) these would be viewed as "lumps"; they wold repulse things on the opposite side of space time.  Conversely, massive objects on the "other" side (the underside/not our side) would create "lumps" on our side, resulting in "dark energy".  Conclusion: dark energy is the gravity of a parallel universe.

@ = something massive (star maybe?)
----- = fabric of space/time

----------_@_----------

From this side, the "valley" caused by the star appears to be a "mountain", repelling all objects away from it.

Of course, this theory only provides for two universes.  Perhaps the gravity in every universe is felt as dark energy in every universe (besides itself).

Which, seeing as black holes go on indefinitely,
------\/------- (bad drawing...), the opposite would be a white hole.  It would be like a funnel though, more things get taken in than expelled.  This seems like Hawking Radiation to me.... now onto my FAVORITE subject:  String theory.  Can we switch to that?

String theory is awesome. I've just recently began to understand most of it.


https://dl.dropbox.com/u/33551365/psyko.png

Offline

 

#180 2013-01-23 20:28:04

3sal2
Scratcher
Registered: 2012-03-22
Posts: 100+

Re: Theoretical Physics

maxskywalker wrote:

Spy-TF2 wrote:

laser314 wrote:

I think that it might be like this:
  the normal timeline
           V
____________________________    ____________
                                                  \ /<-Black hole
                              White hole-> / \
__________________________________________

So for every blackhole there is a whitehole and gravity pushes out and ect.

Right!
So flying into a black hole zaps you into the 2nd dimension for a bit and then the Whitehole brings you back out to the 3rd dimension.

That's what I think.

Oh!  Or maybe into any other parallel universe (I hate to induce any sci-fi feelings to the term; what I mean is another universe with the same 3D coordinates as this one, but seperated by the 4th or higher) where white holes spit it out.

Is it entirely far-fetched that eventually, dark matter (you know, and matter, but dark matter is like 90% of the mass in the universe) catches up with dark energy, causing the collapse of the universe with such force that it inverts, giving itself what would be considered a negative mass.  Then white holes pop up connected universes (well, multiverses now) that have the opposite mass, hence antimatter, while the other matter is what we would consider matter (although to one theorizing before or after the collapsing incedent, they would consider it antimatter).

Dark matter? Dark energy makes up 72.2% of the universe's mass, dark matter is 23.2%, and atoms are just 4.6%.


http://scratch.mit.edu/static/projects/3sal2/3120946_sm.png In 2012, scientists at the LHC discovered the Higgs boson, which explains the source of the masses of the W+, W-, and Z bosons, as well as fermions.

Offline

 

Board footer