I just bought headphones that are too big for my own good.
Here's a link to the online store if you wish to see more.
Magical store
Offline
$130
Ouch.
Last edited by CheeseMunchy (2012-01-05 15:25:35)
Offline
CheeseMunchy wrote:
$130
Ouch.
Agreed.
But, I would like those headphones. Look nice.
Offline
CheeseMunchy wrote:
$130
Ouch.
Mine only cost two pounds
Offline
MrMokey wrote:
My other skullcandy *shudder* headphones were hurting my ears, as in uncomfortable.
Yeah, they're not very comfortable. Which is why I use these * Philips earphones where (according to my sister, who refuses to use them) the bass is "broken."
Offline
I got some for christmas: http://i.walmartimages.com/i/p/00/08/00/68/40/0008006840406_500X500.jpg
They looked kinda like that.
Offline
Mine pull my hair out
But awesome sig! I can name at least half of those characters
Offline
MrMokey wrote:
AnimeCreatorArtist wrote:
Mine pull my hair out
But awesome sig! I can name at least half of those charactersClick it...And my old ones pulled my hair out. And I have long hair
Hmmm, I can't get the Cat In The Hat one.
Offline
nice pair
Offline
Nice. About a year ago, I almost bought a pair of Sony Studio headphones (a $30 pair though, not $130), but didn't, because the connector wasn't 3.5mm minijack.
I now have a pair of Creative WP-300 Bluetooth headphones They are awesome (strong bass, very rare for headphones, especially for ones in this price range ($45-70) ), though they are very picky about connecting.
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
CheeseMunchy wrote:
$130
Ouch.Mine only cost two pounds
Then they probably wouldn't be that great quality, although you don't really seem like an audiophile anyways.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
CheeseMunchy wrote:
$130
Ouch.Mine only cost two pounds
Then they probably wouldn't be that great quality, although you don't really seem like an audiophile anyways.
They're actually really good. The reason they were so cheap was that my friend was selling his pair because he wanted a different pair. It may be second hand, but I can't complain about the price
And what's an audiophile?
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Mine only cost two poundsThen they probably wouldn't be that great quality, although you don't really seem like an audiophile anyways.
They're actually really good. The reason they were so cheap was that my friend was selling his pair because he wanted a different pair. It may be second hand, but I can't complain about the price
And what's an audiophile?
Someone obsessed with collecting/listening to high quality audio, i.e. FLACs, ALACs, SHNs, vinyl records, CDs, and other lossless file formats or uncompressed mediums. Most people just get 256kbps variable bitrate AACs off iTunes, which aren't really worth the dollar they cost.
Offline
veggieman001 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
Then they probably wouldn't be that great quality, although you don't really seem like an audiophile anyways.
They're actually really good. The reason they were so cheap was that my friend was selling his pair because he wanted a different pair. It may be second hand, but I can't complain about the price
And what's an audiophile?Someone obsessed with collecting/listening to high quality audio, i.e. FLACs, ALACs, SHNs, vinyl records, CDs, and other lossless file formats or uncompressed mediums. Most people just get 256kbps variable bitrate AACs off iTunes, which aren't really worth the dollar they cost.
I'm more the opposite then! My iPod is only 8gb, so I always lower the quality just a bit before I put them on. It's not even noticeable, but it knocks about 5mb off the size
Oh, and what is it about me that makes you think I don't seem like an audiophile? Just wondering.
Last edited by RedRocker227 (2012-01-06 14:47:57)
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
They're actually really good. The reason they were so cheap was that my friend was selling his pair because he wanted a different pair. It may be second hand, but I can't complain about the price
And what's an audiophile?Someone obsessed with collecting/listening to high quality audio, i.e. FLACs, ALACs, SHNs, vinyl records, CDs, and other lossless file formats or uncompressed mediums. Most people just get 256kbps variable bitrate AACs off iTunes, which aren't really worth the dollar they cost.
I'm more the opposite then! My iPod is only 8gb, so I always lower the quality just a bit before I put them on. It's not even noticeable, but it knocks about 5mb off the size
Oh, and what is it about me that makes you think I don't seem like an audiophile? Just wondering.
Because your headphones cost 2 pounds. Usually for the best palying quality of good quality files you need expensive headphones.
Offline
MrMokey wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
Someone obsessed with collecting/listening to high quality audio, i.e. FLACs, ALACs, SHNs, vinyl records, CDs, and other lossless file formats or uncompressed mediums. Most people just get 256kbps variable bitrate AACs off iTunes, which aren't really worth the dollar they cost.I'm more the opposite then! My iPod is only 8gb, so I always lower the quality just a bit before I put them on. It's not even noticeable, but it knocks about 5mb off the size
Oh, and what is it about me that makes you think I don't seem like an audiophile? Just wondering.Because your headphones cost 2 pounds. Usually for the best palying quality of good quality files you need expensive headphones.
Oh, okay
Offline
JJROCKER wrote:
You know that images are still disabled, right?
coughantidotecough
Offline