This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#1 2012-01-04 08:57:44

maxskywalker
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-27
Posts: 1000+

The Banning of the [img] Tags

Okay, we all know how the [img] tags got disabled.  The mods say it's to prevent 'image spamming'.  But let's make something of a poll here.  Who has seen image spamming within 6 months, and on which topic, and how many times, and is the post or image still there, and when did you see it?

Witnesses of img spamming: 4
Nonwitnesses: 6

Oh, and hey, what if mods had to approve img tags before they work?

Last edited by maxskywalker (2012-01-05 12:16:49)

Offline

 

#2 2012-01-04 08:59:28

bananaman114
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-03-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

There was a large troll attack (AGAIN -_- )
Yeah I heard it was pretty bad


the sun still shines

Offline

 

#3 2012-01-04 09:04:10

maxskywalker
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-27
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

bananaman114 wrote:

There was a large troll attack (AGAIN -_- )
Yeah I heard it was pretty bad

Which topic was it?

Offline

 

#4 2012-01-04 09:04:27

brettman98
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-10-17
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

riot


http://i40.tinypic.com/n1wbr7.jpg

Offline

 

#5 2012-01-04 09:05:14

bananaman114
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-03-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

maxskywalker wrote:

bananaman114 wrote:

There was a large troll attack (AGAIN -_- )
Yeah I heard it was pretty bad

Which topic was it?

It was more then one
they were all deleted
i believe it was shock [removed - please don't bypass the censor]

Last edited by Paddle2See (2012-01-05 05:22:04)


the sun still shines

Offline

 

#6 2012-01-04 10:51:03

Freakish
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-10-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

bananaman114 wrote:

maxskywalker wrote:

bananaman114 wrote:

There was a large troll attack (AGAIN -_- )
Yeah I heard it was pretty bad

Which topic was it?

It was more then one
they were all deleted
i believe it was shock [removed - please don't bypass the censor]

Yeah it was.
I unfortunately, got to see it.

Last edited by Paddle2See (2012-01-05 05:22:50)


http://i.imgur.com/y3RBV.jpg

Offline

 

#7 2012-01-04 10:53:24

stevetheipad
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-08-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

Luckily, all the pictures were deleted.

I'm not sure if you understand what type of images these were. The same troll trolled on my forums and the images were not pretty. I can't say what they were, but I can say they were 100% inappropriate and crude.


http://i.imgur.com/0x8ia.jpg
gone

Offline

 

#8 2012-01-04 10:58:52

RedRocker227
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-10-26
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

bananaman114 wrote:

There was a large troll attack (AGAIN -_- )
Yeah I heard it was pretty bad

Wait - you mean there was another one? After the one about a week and a half ago?


Why

Offline

 

#9 2012-01-04 10:59:39

bananaman114
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-03-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

RedRocker227 wrote:

bananaman114 wrote:

There was a large troll attack (AGAIN -_- )
Yeah I heard it was pretty bad

Wait - you mean there was another one? After the one about a week and a half ago?

No that was the one
we had one in 2010 as well


the sun still shines

Offline

 

#10 2012-01-04 11:01:51

RedRocker227
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-10-26
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

bananaman114 wrote:

RedRocker227 wrote:

bananaman114 wrote:

There was a large troll attack (AGAIN -_- )
Yeah I heard it was pretty bad

Wait - you mean there was another one? After the one about a week and a half ago?

No that was the one
we had one in 2010 as well

Oh, I thought you meant there were two in the last few weeks!
*Breathes sigh of relief*  tongue


Why

Offline

 

#11 2012-01-04 11:05:37

mattb777
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-07-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

I do have an idea to help solve this issue! The Scratch Team says it's the best one so far! Tl;dl. You're going to have to go to Suggestions.


I'm back  big_smile

Offline

 

#12 2012-01-04 12:26:40

pikachu1337
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-09-23
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

There's this great script somewhere on the forums.
It shows images and using special tags also shows youtube videos and scratch projects directly inside the forums.

Last edited by pikachu1337 (2012-01-04 12:27:41)


http://internetometer.com/imagesmall/24779.png Help my city grow!
Welp.  Obama was elected.  Country's doomed.  Abandon ship?

Offline

 

#13 2012-01-04 12:43:13

werdna123
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-06-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

I agree it's stupid to completely disable all images just because once every couple of years someone does something bad with them. It had been over a year between the two I know of. Sure, if we turn them on, one day it will happen again, but it's so rare that the benefits completely outweigh the problems. I think I'd rather another troll attack than permanent image removal.

It has actually annoyed me many times. I mean, I have to highlight the whole link inside the img tag and open a new tab and paste it in and see what the picture is. And on some topics (especially minecraft ones as people may be showing you pictures of their buildings), I often have to do this many times and it's really, really annoying.

Offline

 

#14 2012-01-04 12:56:12

rabbit1131
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-10-16
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

I can't view this with Antidote ><
Just post. Antidote doesn't work too well  tongue


The Intergalactic Adventures of Revesilia! I hope you will partake in this gigantic undertaking, to build the sequel to the hit map The Adventures of Revesilia! The Intergalactic Adventures of Revesilia Map Builders Application thread! http://internetometer.com/image/35004.png

Offline

 

#15 2012-01-04 13:04:25

flamekyle
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-03-18
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

The stupid things people do for attention.  sad


http://prodegebanners.sitegrip.com/images/swagbucks-173x63Alt5.jpg

Offline

 

#16 2012-01-04 13:26:00

cheddargirl
Scratch Team
Registered: 2008-09-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

maxskywalker wrote:

Okay, we all know how the [img] tags got disabled.  The mods say it's to prevent 'image spamming'.  But let's make something of a poll here.  Who has seen image spamming within 6 months, and on which topic, and how many times, and is the post or image still there, and when did you see it?

Well, they were actually removed because some of the images that were posted recently were extremely bad.

As for the image spamming in general, they're kind of more common than one might think - meme spam is actually the most relevant one, which happens every few weeks or so. (last few ones I've sen within the last week, when users were linking to it instead of posting it). It's probably not as severe as the really bad attack that happened recently, but they can often be rude responses at times, if not just pure spam.

werdna123 wrote:

I agree it's stupid to completely disable all images just because once every couple of years someone does something bad with them. It had been over a year between the two I know of. Sure, if we turn them on, one day it will happen again, but it's so rare that the benefits completely outweigh the problems. I think I'd rather another troll attack than permanent image removal.

I wonder why people say it's permanent when it isn't...  hmm


http://i.imgur.com/8QRYx.png
Everything is better when you add a little cheddar, because when you have cheese your life is at ease  smile

Offline

 

#17 2012-01-04 13:49:43

Blackdog100
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-17
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

I put another idea in suggestions C:


http://i1238.photobucket.com/albums/ff500/Kat_De_Kat/photo-1.jpg

Offline

 

#18 2012-01-04 14:29:45

maxskywalker
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-27
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

stevetheipad wrote:

Luckily, all the pictures were deleted.

I'm not sure if you understand what type of images these were. The same troll trolled on my forums and the images were not pretty. I can't say what they were, but I can say they were 100% inappropriate and crude.

Yeah, I got the idea.

Offline

 

#19 2012-01-04 14:31:39

maxskywalker
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-27
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

cheddargirl wrote:

maxskywalker wrote:

Okay, we all know how the [url]tags got disabled.  The mods say it's to prevent 'image spamming'.  But let's make something of a poll here.  Who has seen image spamming within 6 months, and on which topic, and how many times, and is the post or image still there, and when did you see it?

Well, they were actually removed because some of the images that were posted recently were extremely bad.

As for the image spamming in general, they're kind of more common than one might think - meme spam is actually the most relevant one, which happens every few weeks or so. (last few ones I've sen within the last week, when users were linking to it instead of posting it). It's probably not as severe as the really bad attack that happened recently, but they can often be rude responses at times, if not just pure spam.

werdna123 wrote:

I agree it's stupid to completely disable all images just because once every couple of years someone does something bad with them. It had been over a year between the two I know of. Sure, if we turn them on, one day it will happen again, but it's so rare that the benefits completely outweigh the problems. I think I'd rather another troll attack than permanent image removal.

I wonder why people say it's permanent when it isn't...  hmm

Oh um, and when did memes start going against the Guidelines?

Offline

 

#20 2012-01-04 14:32:57

JJROCKER
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-09-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

I was there for the whole thing. There was a huge troll attack where one person kept posting tons and tons of innapropriate posts on other topics and even made their own. I said that I was going to report them on a separate topic where other people were talking and they saw it, and wrote "JJROCKER suck my ****" I'm surprised the Scratch Team didn't even say anything to me or even say sorry that it all happened  hmm


http://www.blocks.scratchr.org/API.php?action=random&amp;return=image&amp;link1=http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/3491/signature1y.jpg&amp;link2=http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/5272/signature1sx.jpg&amp;link3=http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8514/signature1et.jpg&amp;link4=http://i.imgur.com/POEpQyZ.png&amp;link5=http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/4640/jjrockerfinal.jpg

Offline

 

#21 2012-01-04 14:34:32

The_Dancing_Donut
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-08-03
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

JJROCKER wrote:

I was there for the whole thing. There was a huge troll attack where one person kept posting tons and tons of innapropriate posts on other topics and even made their own. I said that I was going to report them on a separate topic where other people were talking and they saw it, and wrote "JJROCKER suck my ****" I'm surprised the Scratch Team didn't even say anything to me or even say sorry that it all happened  hmm

It's not really the ST's fault that the troll said that to you :L


Offending strangers since 2010.

Offline

 

#22 2012-01-04 14:38:50

JJROCKER
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-09-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

JJROCKER wrote:

I was there for the whole thing. There was a huge troll attack where one person kept posting tons and tons of innapropriate posts on other topics and even made their own. I said that I was going to report them on a separate topic where other people were talking and they saw it, and wrote "JJROCKER suck my ****" I'm surprised the Scratch Team didn't even say anything to me or even say sorry that it all happened  hmm

It's not really the ST's fault that the troll said that to you :L

I know but whether they like it or not, the troll attack did happen on their site.


http://www.blocks.scratchr.org/API.php?action=random&amp;return=image&amp;link1=http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/3491/signature1y.jpg&amp;link2=http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/5272/signature1sx.jpg&amp;link3=http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8514/signature1et.jpg&amp;link4=http://i.imgur.com/POEpQyZ.png&amp;link5=http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/4640/jjrockerfinal.jpg

Offline

 

#23 2012-01-04 14:39:49

imnotbob
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-12-11
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

JJROCKER wrote:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

JJROCKER wrote:

I was there for the whole thing. There was a huge troll attack where one person kept posting tons and tons of innapropriate posts on other topics and even made their own. I said that I was going to report them on a separate topic where other people were talking and they saw it, and wrote "JJROCKER suck my ****" I'm surprised the Scratch Team didn't even say anything to me or even say sorry that it all happened  hmm

It's not really the ST's fault that the troll said that to you :L

I know but whether they like it or not, the troll attack did happen on their site.

Doesn't mean they had to apologize or say anything to you :L


PesterChum Handle: annoyingAnchorman
durp yo terezi sup sup gotta beat john gotta beat john

Offline

 

#24 2012-01-04 14:44:32

JJROCKER
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-09-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

imnotbob wrote:

JJROCKER wrote:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

It's not really the ST's fault that the troll said that to you :L

I know but whether they like it or not, the troll attack did happen on their site.

Doesn't mean they had to apologize or say anything to you :L

I mean apologize for the entire thing like the images and the trolling.


http://www.blocks.scratchr.org/API.php?action=random&amp;return=image&amp;link1=http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/3491/signature1y.jpg&amp;link2=http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/5272/signature1sx.jpg&amp;link3=http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8514/signature1et.jpg&amp;link4=http://i.imgur.com/POEpQyZ.png&amp;link5=http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/4640/jjrockerfinal.jpg

Offline

 

#25 2012-01-04 14:49:36

imnotbob
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-12-11
Posts: 1000+

Re: The Banning of the [img] Tags

JJROCKER wrote:

imnotbob wrote:

JJROCKER wrote:


I know but whether they like it or not, the troll attack did happen on their site.

Doesn't mean they had to apologize or say anything to you :L

I mean apologize for the entire thing like the images and the trolling.

I know but they shouldn't have to apologize for what's not their fault.


PesterChum Handle: annoyingAnchorman
durp yo terezi sup sup gotta beat john gotta beat john

Offline

 

Board footer